a Department of Medical Education, University of Alabama School of Medicine , Birmingham , Alabama , USA.
b Department of Medicine, University of Alabama School of Medicine , Birmingham , Alabama , USA.
Teach Learn Med. 2019 Aug-Sep;31(4):445-452. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2019.1574579. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
Peer mentoring has long been accepted as beneficial in a multitude of fields, but there has been limited description or study of the way these types of relationships may benefit medical students. Peer mentoring may be helpful for 1st-year medical students; however, little evidence is thus far available on which aspects of peer mentoring provide benefit and what those specific benefits are. This study examines the perceived benefits and satisfaction derived by 1st-year medical students from participation in a semi-structured, informal cross-year peer mentoring program. It further attempts to characterize the aspects of peer mentoring relationships that are seen as beneficial to 1st-year students. Data were collected on demographic information, frequency and type of contact with mentor, perception of mentor characteristics, perceived benefits derived from the relationship, and their overall satisfaction with the relationship. First-year medical students at a large academic institution were surveyed on their experience in an informal peer-mentoring program with 2nd-year students serving as mentors. Mentors had minimal training. No mandatory agenda or limitations were placed on the type or subject matter of interactions. Mean overall satisfaction with the peer mentoring program was 7.47 ( = 2.45) on a rating scale where 10 is the most satisfied. Students reported that their peer mentors generally exhibited beneficial attributes and behaviors. Ratings of perceived benefits were somewhat more variable and generally lower. Predictors of four outcomes-overall satisfaction, perceived academic benefit, perceived nonacademic benefit, and perceived clinical benefit-were explored using stepwise linear regression with forward entry and backward elimination to retain the most parsimonious model. Expertise in areas of mentee need was a consistent predictor of all outcomes. Regular involvement with a mentor was a consistent predictor of perceived academic and nonacademic benefit. Demographic characteristics were generally not predictive of outcomes. Peer mentoring is perceived by 1st-year medical students to provide psychosocial and academic benefits that appear to be independent of and complementary to those derived from faculty mentoring. These benefits can be established with minimal expenditure of institutional resources. Peer mentoring efficacy may be increased by more deliberate matching methods and by training mentors in provision of guidance and feedback, though further study is needed.
同伴指导在许多领域被长期认为是有益的,但对于这些类型的关系如何使医学生受益,描述或研究都很有限。同伴指导可能对一年级医学生有帮助;然而,目前几乎没有证据表明同伴指导的哪些方面提供了好处,以及这些具体的好处是什么。本研究考察了一年级医学生参与半结构化、非正式跨年级同伴指导计划所获得的感知益处和满意度。它进一步试图描述对一年级学生有益的同伴指导关系的各个方面。收集了关于人口统计学信息、与导师的联系频率和类型、导师特征的感知、从关系中获得的感知益处以及对关系的整体满意度的数据。在一所大型学术机构,对一年级医学生进行了一项非正式同伴指导计划的调查,该计划由二年级学生担任导师。导师接受了最少的培训。没有强制性议程或限制互动的类型或主题。在 10 分为最满意的评分量表上,对同伴指导计划的总体满意度平均为 7.47(=2.45)。学生们报告说,他们的同伴导师通常表现出有益的特质和行为。感知益处的评分则更为多变,总体较低。使用逐步线性回归,采用向前输入和向后消除的方法,保留最简约的模型,探讨了四个结果(总体满意度、感知学术益处、感知非学术益处和感知临床益处)的预测因素。在受指导者需求领域的专业知识是所有结果的一致预测因素。与导师定期接触是感知学术和非学术益处的一致预测因素。人口统计学特征通常不是结果的预测因素。同伴指导被一年级医学生认为提供了心理社会和学术上的好处,这些好处似乎独立于、也与导师指导所带来的好处相辅相成。这些好处可以在不花费机构资源的情况下建立。通过更精心的匹配方法和培训导师提供指导和反馈,同伴指导的效果可能会提高,但还需要进一步研究。