Roca M M, Castillo M G, Harrison N A, Oropeza C
Escuela Agrícola Panamericana, Zamorano, P.O. Box 93, Tegucigalpa, Honduras.
University of Florida, Plant Pathology Department, Research and Education Center, Fort Lauderdale 33314.
Plant Dis. 2006 Apr;90(4):526. doi: 10.1094/PD-90-0526B.
Lethal yellowing (LY) of coconut palm (Cocos nucifera L.) caused by a subgroup 16SrIV-A phytoplasma has been present along the northern coast and adjacent Bay Islands of Honduras since 1996. In the southern municipalities of San Esteban and Guanaco, approximately 150 km from the Atlantic coast, substantial numbers of coyol palm (Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq.) Lodd. ex Mart.) and several coconut palms growing nearby were either dead or in an advanced stage of decline during 2005. Declining palms of both species exhibited loss of fruit, withered inflorescences, and dried, discolored (grayish brown) leaves. Most or all leaves on declining palms had collapsed and hung downward around the stem. Samples (3 to 5 g) of tissue were excised from stems of 20 coyol and 2 coconut palms. DNA was extracted from each sample using a previously described protocol (2) and assayed for phytoplasma DNA using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) employing phytoplasma universal rRNA primer pair P1 (1) and P7 (4). A product of expected size (approximately 1.8 kb) was amplified from 12 of 20 diseased coyol palms, 2 of 2 diseased coconut palms and from DNA of a Florida-grown Chinese fan palm (Livistona chinensis (Jacq.) R. Br. ex Mart.) with LY symptoms included as a known positive control. Amplified P1/P7 products used in a nested PCR assay with 16SrIV-specific primer pair LY16Sf (2) and LY16Sr (5'-GCTTACGCA-GTTAGGCTGTC-3') yielded a product of approximately 1.39 kb. Neither primary nor nested PCRs generated a product from DNA of healthy coconut palm. Poor quality of tissues within stems of declining palms may have contributed to lack of amplification of any product from eight coyol samples. A reevaluation of DNA samples using PCR employing nonribosomal primer pair LYF1/LYR1, which specifically detects subgroup 16SrIV-A phytoplasmas (3), failed to amplify an expected 1-kb product from any palm sample other than the LY positive control. Digestion of nested amplification products (1.39 kb) with AluI endonuclease and electrophoresis of digests through 8% polyacrylamide gels revealed the same three-fragment restriction pattern for all phytoplasmas detected in coyol and coconut palms. The pattern differed from the five-fragment profile of LY phytoplasma rDNA included for comparative purposes. These results indicate that coyol palm is a new phytoplasma host and that decline symptoms on coyol and adjacent coconuts were not a consequence of natural dispersion of subgroup 16SrIV-A phytoplasmas from the northern coast. The 16S rDNA sequences amplified from coyol palm decline (CPD) (GenBank Accession No. DQ321818) and coconut decline (CLDO) (GenBank Accession No. DQ321819) phytoplasmas were coidentical and most similar (99.87%) to that of Yucatan coconut lethal decline (LDY), a known subgroup 16SrIV-B strain. This relationship was further supported by phylogenetic analysis of rDNA sequences. On the basis of these findings, we have tentatively concluded that strains CPD and CLDO represent new members of the coconut lethal yellows subgroup 16SrIV-B. References: (1) S. Deng and C. Hiruki, J. Microbiol. Methods 14:53, 1991 (2) N. A. Harrison et al. Plant Dis. 86:676, 2002 (3) N. A. Harrison et al. Plant Pathol. 43:998, 1994. (4) C. D. Smart et al. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:2988, 1996.
自1996年以来,由16SrIV-A亚组植原体引起的椰子树(Cocos nucifera L.)致死黄化病(LY)一直存在于洪都拉斯北部海岸及邻近的海湾群岛。在距大西洋海岸约150公里的南部城镇圣埃斯特万和瓜纳科,2005年大量的油棕(Acrocomia aculeata (Jacq.) Lodd. ex Mart.)以及附近生长的一些椰子树不是死亡就是处于衰退的晚期。这两个树种衰退的植株都表现出落果、花序枯萎以及叶片干枯、变色(灰棕色)。衰退植株上的大多数或所有叶片都已倒伏并垂挂在茎干周围。从20株油棕和2株椰子树的茎干上切取组织样本(3至5克)。使用先前描述的方法(2)从每个样本中提取DNA,并使用植原体通用rRNA引物对P1(1)和P7(4)通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测植原体DNA。从20株患病油棕中的12株、2株患病椰子树以及作为已知阳性对照的一株佛罗里达州种植的具有LY症状的中国扇棕(Livistona chinensis (Jacq.) R. Br. ex Mart.)的DNA中扩增出预期大小(约1.8 kb)的产物。用16SrIV特异性引物对LY16Sf(2)和LY16Sr(5'-GCTTACGCA-GTTAGGCTGTC-3')进行巢式PCR分析时,扩增的P / P7产物产生了一个约1.39 kb的产物。从健康椰子树的DNA中,无论是初次PCR还是巢式PCR都未产生产物。衰退植株茎干内组织质量较差可能是导致8个油棕样本未扩增出任何产物的原因。使用特异性检测16SrIV-A亚组植原体的非核糖体引物对LYF1 / LYR1进行PCR对DNA样本进行重新评估,除LY阳性对照外,未能从任何棕榈样本中扩增出预期的1 kb产物。用AluI内切酶消化巢式扩增产物(1.39 kb),并通过8%聚丙烯酰胺凝胶对消化产物进行电泳,结果显示在油棕和椰子树中检测到的所有植原体具有相同的三片段限制性图谱。该图谱与用于比较目的的LY植原体rDNA的五片段图谱不同。这些结果表明油棕是一种新的植原体宿主,并且油棕和相邻椰子树的衰退症状不是16SrIV-A亚组植原体从北部海岸自然扩散的结果。从油棕衰退(CPD)(GenBank登录号DQ321818)和椰子衰退(CLDO)(GenBank登录号DQ321819)植原体中扩增的16S rDNA序列是相同的,并且与已知的16SrIV-B亚组菌株尤卡坦椰子致死衰退(LDY)的序列最相似(99.87%)。rDNA序列的系统发育分析进一步支持了这种关系。基于这些发现,我们初步得出结论,CPD和CLDO菌株代表椰子致死黄化亚组16SrIV-B的新成员。参考文献:(1)S. Deng和C. Hiruki,J. Microbiol. Methods 14:53,1991(2)N. A. Harrison等人,Plant Dis. 86:676,2室(3)N. A. Harrison等人,Plant Pathol. 43:998,1994。(4)C. D. Smart等人,Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:2室,1996。