Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, Georgia, USA.
Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Jul;127:307-315. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.299. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
Diagnosis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks traditionally involves laboratory testing of markers and appropriate imaging. Surgical localization can be difficult, and the inability to accurately localize skull base defects leads to increased rates of repair failure and complications. Many imaging techniques localizing and identifying CSF leaks have been proposed. Comparisons of current and investigational imaging techniques used to localize CSF leaks are reviewed.
A comprehensive and systematic search through PubMed, Scopus, and reference lists from relevant articles was completed to identify literature on sensitivities of different imaging methods for localization and detection of CSF leaks. Prospective, retrospective, and case series published since 1995 that addressed imaging techniques for CSF leaks confined to the skull base were included. Sensitivities of each major imaging technique proposed were recorded and analyzed.
In total, 133 studies initially were screened from 2125 studies on preliminary search. Of these, 38 studies were included based on inclusion criteria. Studies were segregated by imaging modality. A total of 1000 patients with CSF leaks subsequently were evaluated.
Although radionuclide cisternography has been the historical standard, recent imaging techniques have emerged considering the low sensitivity. Computed tomography cisternography with contrast also has low sensitivity, even in active leaks. Although high-resolution computed tomography is commonly the initial study of choice, magnetic resonance imaging methods, particularly 3-dimensional imaging, may prove to be a more sensitive study of choice. Computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging combination methods may show promise in localizing CSF leaks. Stratifying by status and etiology may be an important determinant. Further studies investigating various imaging techniques for localizing CSF leaks are needed.
传统上,脑脊液(CSF)漏的诊断涉及标志物的实验室检测和适当的影像学检查。外科定位可能很困难,无法准确定位颅底缺陷会导致修复失败和并发症的发生率增加。已经提出了许多用于定位和识别 CSF 漏的成像技术。本文回顾了用于定位 CSF 漏的当前和研究中的成像技术的比较。
通过 PubMed、Scopus 和相关文章的参考文献列表进行了全面而系统的搜索,以确定有关不同成像方法对 CSF 漏定位和检测的敏感性的文献。纳入了自 1995 年以来针对限于颅底的 CSF 漏的成像技术的前瞻性、回顾性和病例系列研究。记录并分析了每种主要成像技术的敏感性。
初步搜索共筛选出 2125 篇研究中的 133 篇研究,其中 38 篇研究符合纳入标准。这些研究按成像方式进行了分类。共有 1000 例 CSF 漏患者随后接受了评估。
尽管放射性核素脑池造影术一直是历史标准,但考虑到敏感性较低,最近出现了新的成像技术。即使在活动性漏的情况下,增强 CT 脑池造影术的敏感性也较低。尽管高分辨率 CT 通常是首选的初始研究,但磁共振成像方法,特别是 3 维成像,可能会成为更敏感的选择。CT/磁共振成像联合方法可能在定位 CSF 漏方面显示出前景。根据状态和病因分层可能是一个重要的决定因素。需要进一步研究各种用于定位 CSF 漏的成像技术。