慢性肾脏病患者诊所血压与动态血压差值的大小与不良结局风险的关系。
Magnitude of the Difference Between Clinic and Ambulatory Blood Pressures and Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.
机构信息
1 Division of Nephrology Department of Medicine University of California, San Francisco San Francisco CA.
2 Division of Pediatric Nephrology Department of Pediatrics University of California, San Francisco San Francisco CA.
出版信息
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 May 7;8(9):e011013. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011013.
Background Obtaining 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure ( BP ) is recommended for the detection of masked or white-coat hypertension. Our objective was to determine whether the magnitude of the difference between ambulatory and clinic BP s has prognostic implications. Methods and Results We included 610 participants of the AASK (African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension) Cohort Study who had clinic and ambulatory BPs performed in close proximity in time. We used Cox models to determine the association between the absolute systolic BP ( SBP ) difference between clinic and awake ambulatory BPs (primary predictor) and death and end-stage renal disease. Of 610 AASK Cohort Study participants, 200 (32.8%) died during a median follow-up of 9.9 years; 178 (29.2%) developed end-stage renal disease. There was a U-shaped association between the clinic and ambulatory SBP difference with risk of death, but not end-stage renal disease. A 5- to <10-mm Hg higher clinic versus awake SBP (white-coat effect) was associated with a trend toward higher (adjusted) mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 0.94-3.56) compared with a 0- to <5-mm Hg clinic-awake SBP difference (reference group). A ≥10-mm Hg clinic-awake SBP difference was associated with even higher mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.27-4.22). A ≥-5-mm Hg clinic-awake SBP difference was also associated with higher mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.05-3.15) compared with the reference group. Conclusions A U-shaped association exists between the magnitude of the difference between clinic and ambulatory SBP and mortality. Higher clinic versus ambulatory BPs (as in white-coat effect) may be associated with higher risk of death in black patients with chronic kidney disease.
背景
为了检测隐匿性或白大衣性高血压,建议进行 24 小时动态血压监测。我们的目的是确定日间血压和诊室血压之间差值的大小是否具有预后意义。
方法和结果
我们纳入了 AASK(非洲裔美国人肾脏病和高血压研究)队列研究中 610 名在时间上密切接近时进行了诊室和动态血压测量的参与者。我们使用 Cox 模型来确定诊室和清醒活动时收缩压(SBP)差值的绝对值(主要预测因素)与死亡和终末期肾病之间的关联。在 610 名 AASK 队列研究参与者中,有 200 名(32.8%)在中位随访 9.9 年后死亡;178 名(29.2%)发生终末期肾病。诊室和日间 SBP 差值与死亡风险之间存在 U 型关联,但与终末期肾病无关。与 0-<5mmHg 的诊室-清醒 SBP 差值(参考组)相比,5-<10mmHg 的诊室相对于清醒 SBP 差值(白大衣效应)与更高的(校正)死亡风险呈趋势相关(校正后的危险比,1.84;95%CI,0.94-3.56)。≥10mmHg 的诊室-清醒 SBP 差值与更高的死亡率风险相关(校正后的危险比,2.31;95%CI,1.27-4.22)。与参考组相比,≥-5mmHg 的诊室-清醒 SBP 差值也与更高的死亡率相关(校正后的危险比,1.82;95%CI,1.05-3.15)。
结论
诊室和日间 SBP 差值的大小与死亡率之间存在 U 型关联。与白大衣效应相关的诊室血压高于日间血压可能与慢性肾脏病黑人患者的死亡风险增加相关。