• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国三级/四级新生儿重症监护病房中早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征表面活性剂治疗的卫生经济学与治疗结果

Health Economics and Outcomes of Surfactant Treatments for Respiratory Distress Syndrome Among Preterm Infants in US Level III/IV Neonatal Intensive Care Units.

作者信息

Sekar Krishnamurthy, Fuentes Daniel, Krukas-Hampel Michelle R, Ernst Frank R

出版信息

J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Mar-Apr;24(2):117-127. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-24.2.117.

DOI:10.5863/1551-6776-24.2.117
PMID:31019404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6478364/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare length of stay (LOS), costs, mechanical ventilation (MV), and mortality in preterm infants treated in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) with beractant (BE), calfactant (CA), and poractant alfa (PA) for Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS).

METHODS

This study evaluated preterm infants born between 2010 and 2013 with RDS diagnosis, gestational age of 25 to 36 weeks, birthweight of ≥500 g, and age of ≤2 days on first surfactant administration. Multivariable regression was used to evaluate all NICU outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 13,240 infants meeting the study criteria, 4136 (31.2%) received BE, 2502 (18.9%) received CA, and 6602 (49.9%) received PA. Adjusted analyses estimated similar mean LOS (BE 26.7 days, CA 27.8 days, and PA 26.2 days) and hospital costs (BE: $50,929; CA: $50,785; and PA: $50,212). Compared to PA, BE and CA were associated with greater odds of MV use on day 3 (OR = 1.56 and 1.60, respectively) and day 7 (OR = 1.39 and 1.28, respectively; all p < 0.05). Adjusted NICU mortality was significantly higher only with CA vs PA (OR = 1.51; p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Adjusted NICU LOS and costs were similar among BE, CA, and PA. Infants receiving PA were less likely to be on MV at 3 and 7 days, and PA treatment was associated with lower odds of NICU mortality when compared to CA.

摘要

目的

比较在新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)接受贝拉克坦(BE)、卡富康(CA)和猪肺磷脂(PA)治疗呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的早产儿的住院时间(LOS)、费用、机械通气(MV)情况及死亡率。

方法

本研究评估了2010年至2013年出生、诊断为RDS、胎龄为25至36周、出生体重≥500g且首次使用表面活性剂时年龄≤2天的早产儿。采用多变量回归评估所有NICU结局。

结果

在13240名符合研究标准的婴儿中,4136名(31.2%)接受了BE,2502名(18.9%)接受了CA,6602名(49.9%)接受了PA。校正分析估计平均住院时间相似(BE为26.7天,CA为27.8天,PA为26.2天),医院费用也相似(BE:50929美元;CA:50785美元;PA:50212美元)。与PA相比,BE和CA在第3天(OR分别为1.56和1.60)和第7天(OR分别为1.39和1.28;均p<0.05)使用MV 的几率更高。校正后的NICU死亡率仅CA与PA相比显著更高(OR = 1.51;p = 0.015)。

结论

BE、CA和PA之间校正后的NICU住院时间和费用相似。接受PA治疗的婴儿在第3天和第7天接受MV治疗的可能性较小,与CA相比,PA治疗的NICU死亡率几率更低。

相似文献

1
Health Economics and Outcomes of Surfactant Treatments for Respiratory Distress Syndrome Among Preterm Infants in US Level III/IV Neonatal Intensive Care Units.美国三级/四级新生儿重症监护病房中早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征表面活性剂治疗的卫生经济学与治疗结果
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Mar-Apr;24(2):117-127. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-24.2.117.
2
Comparative effectiveness of surfactant preparations in premature infants.早产儿表面活性剂制剂的疗效比较。
J Pediatr. 2013 Oct;163(4):955-60.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.04.053. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
3
Comparison of Efficacy and Pharmacoeconomic Outcomes Between Calfactant and Poractant Alfa in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome.珂立苏与固尔苏治疗早产新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效及药物经济学比较
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Jun;29(3):241-247. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.241. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
4
A pharmacoeconomic analysis of in-hospital costs resulting from reintubation in preterm infants treated with lucinactant, beractant, or poractant alfa.对接受卢西纳可、贝拉克坦或泊拉坦阿尔法治疗的早产儿再次插管导致的住院费用进行的药物经济学分析。
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Jul;17(3):220-7. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-17.3.220.
5
Health Economic Studies of Surfactant Replacement Therapy in Neonates with Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Literature Review.新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征表面活性剂替代疗法的卫生经济学研究:一项系统文献综述
Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 May;7(3):359-371. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00399-x. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
6
Efficacy of surfactant-TA, calfactant and poractant alfa for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a retrospective study.表面活性物质-TA、珂立苏和固尔苏用于早产新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效:一项回顾性研究
Yonsei Med J. 2015 Mar;56(2):433-9. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2015.56.2.433.
7
Patent ductus arteriosus hemodynamics in very premature infants treated with poractant alfa or beractant for respiratory distress syndrome.肺表面活性剂蛋白制剂治疗呼吸窘迫综合征的极早产儿动脉导管未闭血流动力学
J Perinatol. 2010 Oct;30(10):671-6. doi: 10.1038/jp.2010.21. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
8
Poractant alfa and beractant treatment of very premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome.猪肺磷脂和牛肺磷脂治疗有呼吸窘迫综合征的极早产儿。
J Perinatol. 2010 Oct;30(10):665-70. doi: 10.1038/jp.2010.20. Epub 2010 Mar 25.
9
A randomized, multicenter masked comparison trial of poractant alfa (Curosurf) versus beractant (Survanta) in the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants.一项关于猪肺磷脂(珂立苏)与贝拉克坦(固尔苏)治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的随机、多中心、双盲对照试验。
Am J Perinatol. 2004 Apr;21(3):109-19. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-823779.
10
A comparative pharmacoeconomic assessment of two surfactants for the prevention of respiratory distress syndrome.两种用于预防呼吸窘迫综合征的表面活性剂的比较药物经济学评估。
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jan;11(1):43-54. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-11.1.43.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the Effects of Two Surfactant Administration Methods: Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy (MIST) with Intubation (INSURE) in Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.比较两种表面活性物质给药方法的效果:经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)联合微创肺表面活性物质(MIST)治疗与气管插管肺表面活性物质(INSURE)治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的效果比较。
Adv Respir Med. 2024 Oct 11;92(5):384-394. doi: 10.3390/arm92050036.
2
Comparison of Efficacy and Pharmacoeconomic Outcomes Between Calfactant and Poractant Alfa in Preterm Infants With Respiratory Distress Syndrome.珂立苏与固尔苏治疗早产新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效及药物经济学比较
J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Jun;29(3):241-247. doi: 10.5863/1551-6776-29.3.241. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
3
Comparison of efficacy between beractant and poractant alfa in respiratory distress syndrome among preterm infants (28-33 weeks gestational age) using the less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) technique: A randomized controlled trial.使用微创表面活性剂给药(LISA)技术比较贝拉克坦和猪肺磷脂对孕周28 - 33周早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
J Perinatol. 2024 Apr 12. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-01962-y.
4
Health Economic Studies of Surfactant Replacement Therapy in Neonates with Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Systematic Literature Review.新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征表面活性剂替代疗法的卫生经济学研究:一项系统文献综述
Pharmacoecon Open. 2023 May;7(3):359-371. doi: 10.1007/s41669-023-00399-x. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
5
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration: A Review of Current Evidence of Clinical Outcomes With Beractant.微创表面活性剂给药:贝拉克坦临床结局的当前证据综述
Cureus. 2022 Oct 12;14(10):e30223. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30223. eCollection 2022 Oct.
6
Surfactant Stock Optimization for Cost Minimization in Neonatal Intensive Care Units.优化表面活性剂库存以降低新生儿重症监护病房的成本。
J Healthc Eng. 2021 Dec 1;2021:8346584. doi: 10.1155/2021/8346584. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Evolution of surfactant therapy for respiratory distress syndrome: past, present, and future.呼吸窘迫综合征表面活性剂治疗的演变:过去、现在与未来。
Pediatr Res. 2017 Jan;81(1-2):240-248. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.203. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
2
Association of Noninvasive Ventilation Strategies With Mortality and Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Among Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.非侵入性通气策略与早产儿死亡率和支气管肺发育不良的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2016 Aug 9;316(6):611-24. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10708.
3
An Official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Workshop Report: Evaluation of Respiratory Mechanics and Function in the Pediatric and Neonatal Intensive Care Units.美国胸科学会/欧洲呼吸学会官方研讨会报告:儿科和新生儿重症监护病房呼吸力学与功能评估
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016 Feb;13(2):S1-11. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201511-730ST.
4
Noninvasive Respiratory Support.无创呼吸支持
Pediatrics. 2016 Jan;137(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3758. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
5
Comparison of animal-derived surfactants for the prevention and treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants.用于预防和治疗早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征的动物源性表面活性剂的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Dec 21;2015(12):CD010249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010249.pub2.
6
Noninvasive Ventilation With vs Without Early Surfactant to Prevent Chronic Lung Disease in Preterm Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.经鼻持续气道正压通气联合与不联合早期肺表面活性物质预防早产儿慢性肺疾病的系统评价和 Meta 分析。
JAMA Pediatr. 2015 Aug;169(8):731-9. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.0510.
7
Impact of early extubation and reintubation on the incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in neonates.早期拔管和重新插管对新生儿支气管肺发育不良发生率的影响。
Am J Perinatol. 2014 Dec;31(12):1063-72. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1371702. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
8
Surfactant replacement therapy for preterm and term neonates with respiratory distress.表面活性物质替代疗法治疗有呼吸窘迫的早产儿和足月儿。
Pediatrics. 2014 Jan;133(1):156-63. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3443. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
9
Accounting for variation in length of NICU stay for extremely low birth weight infants.核算极低出生体重儿在新生儿重症监护病房的住院时间差异。
J Perinatol. 2013 Nov;33(11):872-6. doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.92. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
10
Comparative effectiveness of surfactant preparations in premature infants.早产儿表面活性剂制剂的疗效比较。
J Pediatr. 2013 Oct;163(4):955-60.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.04.053. Epub 2013 Jun 12.