Suppr超能文献

癫痫持续状态的神经调节技术:综述。

Neuromodulation techniques for status epilepticus: A review.

机构信息

Neurophysiology Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City, Mexico.

Neurophysiology Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Manuel Velasco Suárez, Mexico City, Mexico.

出版信息

Brain Stimul. 2019 Jul-Aug;12(4):835-844. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Apr 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), Vagal Nerve Stimulation (VNS), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) and Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) are neuromodulation therapies that have been used to treat Status Epilepticus (SE).

OBJECTIVE

Review the literature about the efficacy and safety of neuromodulation therapies in SE in humans.

METHODS

We searched studies in PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and Science Direct (inception to June 2018). Four review authors independently selected the studies, extracted data and assessed the methodological quality of the studies using the recommendations of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, PRISMA guidelines, Oxford and GRADE scales, and Murad et al., 2018 methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports.

RESULTS

We analyzed 27 articles (45 patients) with 4 different neuromodulation therapies. In ECT we found 80% rate of disruption of SE and 5% of adverse events was reported. Using iVNS 15/16 (93.7%) patients resolved the SE. All patients who underwent TMS and DBS aborted SE, however, 50% of patients with DBS had severe adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Case series and case reports suggest that neuromodulation therapies can abort SE in 80-100% of patients (Oxford scale and GRADE were level 4 and D) with a wide range of adverse effects, which claims for prospective studies on the relationship be-tween efficacy and safety.

摘要

背景

电痉挛疗法(ECT)、迷走神经刺激(VNS)、经颅磁刺激(TMS)和深部脑刺激(DBS)是已用于治疗癫痫持续状态(SE)的神经调节疗法。

目的

综述神经调节疗法治疗 SE 的疗效和安全性的相关文献。

方法

我们在 PubMed、Scopus、Google Scholar 和 Science Direct(从建立到 2018 年 6 月)上检索研究。四位综述作者独立选择研究、提取数据,并使用 Cochrane 干预系统评价手册、PRISMA 指南、牛津和 GRADE 量表以及 Murad 等人的建议评估研究的方法学质量,2018 年病例系列和病例报告的方法学质量和综合评价。

结果

我们分析了 27 篇文章(45 例患者)和 4 种不同的神经调节疗法。在 ECT 中,我们发现 SE 中断率为 80%,报告的不良事件发生率为 5%。使用 iVNS,15/16(93.7%)例患者 SE 得到缓解。所有接受 TMS 和 DBS 的患者均终止 SE,但 50%的 DBS 患者出现严重不良事件。

结论

病例系列和病例报告表明,神经调节疗法可以使 80-100%的 SE 患者(牛津量表和 GRADE 为 4 级和 D 级)中止癫痫发作,但不良事件的种类繁多,需要进行关于疗效和安全性之间关系的前瞻性研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验