核心结局领域的日益复杂性。

The increasing complexity of the core outcomes landscape.

机构信息

Center for Medical Technology Policy, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Center for Medical Technology Policy, Baltimore, MD, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Dec;116:150-154. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.05.016. Epub 2019 May 23.

Abstract

In this project, we set out to identify ways to increase the uptake of core outcome sets in clinical research. In doing so, we uncovered a growing recognition, across many different health care sectors, of the need for common, relevant outcomes to improve the quality of decision-making. This has led to a plethora of projects, initiatives, and new organizations all intended to develop standardized outcomes and outcome measures for their particular fields. However, the standardized outcome sets developed across siloed initiatives do not carry over to other sectors, such as from research to quality of care. This trend has the potential to lead to confusion and unintended redundancies, as well as wasteful use of both financial and intellectual resources. Better communication and collaboration among different initiatives, and more deliberate alignments of initiative scopes, are needed to ensure a future paradigm in which standards align across contexts where possible and differ for understandable and transparent reasons.

摘要

在这个项目中,我们旨在寻找方法来增加核心结果集在临床研究中的应用。在这样做的过程中,我们发现,在许多不同的医疗保健领域,人们越来越认识到需要共同的、相关的结果,以提高决策质量。这导致了大量的项目、倡议和新组织,旨在为其特定领域开发标准化的结果和结果衡量标准。然而,不同孤立倡议中制定的标准化结果集并不能扩展到其他领域,例如从研究到护理质量。这种趋势有可能导致混淆和不必要的重复,以及浪费财务和智力资源。需要更好的沟通和不同倡议之间的合作,以及更有意识地调整倡议范围,以确保未来的模式是在可能的情况下使标准在不同背景下保持一致,并出于可以理解和透明的原因而有所不同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索