• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对本科护生批判性思维的教学策略和结果评估:系统评价方案。

Teaching strategies and outcome assessments targeting critical thinking in bachelor nursing students: a scoping review protocol.

机构信息

Department of Care Science, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden

Department of Care Science, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 2;10(1):e033214. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033214.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033214
PMID:32014875
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7044997/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Applying critical thinking is essential for nursing students both in an academic and clinical context. Particularly, as critical thinking is a vital part of nurses' everyday problem-solving and decision-making processes. Therefore, regardless of the topic taught or the setting in which it is taught, it requires teaching strategies especially targeting students' critical thinking skills and abilities. One challenge with the latter is the difficulties to assess and evaluate the impact of such teaching strategies on the students' critical thinking disposition. Hence, our objective will be to review published literature on; existing teaching strategies and outcomes assessments targeting nursing students' critical thinking skills and abilities.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Our scoping review will be conducted in accordance with Arksey and O'Malley's framework for scoping studies. Search strategies will be developed in cooperation with an experienced librarian, and adjusted to each individual database for example, CINAHL, PubMed, PsycINFO, ERIC and ERC. A preliminary search in CINAHL was conducted on the 17 of July 2019. Peer-reviewed published studies conducted with a qualitative, quantitative or mixed method design and focussing our objectives, will be eligible for inclusion. Included studies will be quality assessed in accordance with their study design. Data will be charted using a standardised extraction form. The qualitative data will be presented through a thematic analyses, and the quantitative data by descriptive numerical analysis. Lastly, nurse educators and nursing students will be consulted for validation of the findings from the scoping review.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Under the Swedish Ethical Review Act (2003:460) this study does not need ethical clearance by a Regional Ethical Review Authority as it not includes any primary empirical data on biological material or sensitive information. The findings will be used to inform the design of a future study aiming to develop an, and subsequently evaluate it, educational intervention targeting teaching strategies focussing on nursing students' critical thinking skills and abilities.

摘要

简介

批判性思维对于护理专业的学生在学术和临床环境中都至关重要。特别是,批判性思维是护士日常解决问题和决策过程的重要组成部分。因此,无论教授的主题是什么,也无论教学环境如何,都需要专门针对学生批判性思维技能和能力的教学策略。后者的一个挑战是,评估和评估这些教学策略对学生批判性思维倾向的影响具有一定难度。因此,我们的目标是回顾已发表的文献,探讨针对护理学生批判性思维技能和能力的现有教学策略和成果评估。

方法和分析

我们的范围综述将根据 Arksey 和 O'Malley 的范围研究框架进行。搜索策略将与经验丰富的图书馆员合作制定,并根据每个数据库进行调整,例如 CINAHL、PubMed、PsycINFO、ERIC 和 ERC。2019 年 7 月 17 日,在 CINAHL 中进行了初步搜索。符合我们目标的、具有定性、定量或混合方法设计并进行的同行评审已发表研究将有资格入选。根据其研究设计,对纳入的研究进行质量评估。使用标准化的提取表格对数据进行图表绘制。将通过主题分析呈现定性数据,并通过描述性数值分析呈现定量数据。最后,将咨询护理教育者和护理学生,以验证范围综述的研究结果。

伦理和传播

根据《瑞典伦理审查法》(2003:460),这项研究不需要地区伦理审查机构的伦理批准,因为它不包括任何针对生物材料或敏感信息的原始经验数据。研究结果将用于为未来的研究提供信息,该研究旨在开发一种针对护理学生批判性思维技能和能力的教学策略的教育干预措施,并随后对其进行评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2942/7044997/fe8c3cf4f586/bmjopen-2019-033214f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2942/7044997/fe8c3cf4f586/bmjopen-2019-033214f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2942/7044997/fe8c3cf4f586/bmjopen-2019-033214f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Teaching strategies and outcome assessments targeting critical thinking in bachelor nursing students: a scoping review protocol.针对本科护生批判性思维的教学策略和结果评估:系统评价方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 2;10(1):e033214. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033214.
2
Bachelor nursing students´ and their educators´ experiences of teaching strategies targeting critical thinking: A scoping review.本科护理学生及其教育者对针对批判性思维的教学策略的体验:范围综述。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2022 Aug;63:103409. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2022.103409. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
3
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
4
Socioemotional Skills in the Teaching-Learning Process Mediated by Medium- and High-Fidelity Clinical Simulation in Nursing Students: Protocol for a Scoping Review.护理专业学生在中高仿真临床模拟教学-学习过程中的社会情感技能:系统评价方案。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Aug 19;13:e56436. doi: 10.2196/56436.
5
Fundamental nursing care focusing on older people's needs and continuity of long-term care: a scoping review protocol.关注老年人需求和长期护理连续性的基础护理:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 28;13(3):e069798. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069798.
6
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
7
Effectiveness and experience of arts-based pedagogy among undergraduate nursing students: a mixed methods systematic review.本科护理专业学生中基于艺术的教学法的有效性与经验:一项混合方法系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Nov;14(11):139-239. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-003188.
8
The efficacy of team-based learning in developing the generic capability of problem-solving ability and critical thinking skills in nursing education: A systematic review.团队学习在培养护理教育中通用能力——问题解决能力和批判性思维技能方面的效果:系统评价。
Nurse Educ Today. 2023 Mar;122:105704. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105704. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
9
A protocol for a scoping review of the use of mental simulation and full-scale simulation in practising healthcare decision-making skills of undergraduate nursing students.一项针对使用心理模拟和全规模模拟来实践本科护理学生医疗保健决策技能的范围综述的方案。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2023 Aug;71:103699. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103699. Epub 2023 Jun 30.
10
How do nurses promote critical thinking in acute care? A scoping literature review.护士如何在急症护理中促进批判性思维?一项范围综述文献。
Nurse Educ Pract. 2021 May;53:103074. doi: 10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103074. Epub 2021 May 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The process of pain assessment in people with dementia living in nursing homes: a scoping review.养老院中痴呆症患者的疼痛评估过程:一项范围综述
Palliat Care Soc Pract. 2025 Jan 6;19:26323524241308589. doi: 10.1177/26323524241308589. eCollection 2025.
2
Exploring the link of personality traits and tutors' instruction on critical thinking disposition: a cross-sectional study among Chinese medical graduate students.探索人格特质与导师对批判性思维倾向指导之间的联系:一项针对中国医学研究生的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Aug 31;14(8):e082461. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-082461.
3
Critical thinking disposition of medical students in Anhui Province, China: a cross-sectional investigation.

本文引用的文献

1
Protocol for a scoping review on the conceptualisation of learning in undergraduate clinical nursing practice.本科临床护理实践中学习概念化的范围综述研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Feb 19;9(2):e024360. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024360.
2
Sound clinical judgment in nursing: A concept analysis.护理中的合理临床判断:一项概念分析
Nurs Forum. 2019 Jan;54(1):102-110. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12303. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
3
PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.PRISMA 扩展用于范围审查 (PRISMA-ScR): 清单和解释。
中国安徽省医学生批判性思维倾向的横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 8;23(1):652. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04646-x.
4
Construction of an evaluation index system for undergraduate nursing teachers' curriculum humanistic competence: a Delphi study in China.本科护理教师课程人文能力评价指标体系的构建:一项中国的德尔菲研究
BMC Nurs. 2023 Aug 25;22(1):284. doi: 10.1186/s12912-023-01432-4.
5
Fundamental nursing care focusing on older people's needs and continuity of long-term care: a scoping review protocol.关注老年人需求和长期护理连续性的基础护理:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Mar 28;13(3):e069798. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069798.
6
Nursing care and models of care in relation to older people in long-term care contexts: a scoping review protocol.长期护理环境中与老年人相关的护理关怀和护理模式:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 18;12(11):e064610. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064610.
Ann Intern Med. 2018 Oct 2;169(7):467-473. doi: 10.7326/M18-0850. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
4
Strategies used for the promotion of critical thinking in nursing undergraduate education: A systematic review.护理本科教育中促进批判性思维的策略:一项系统综述。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Oct;57:103-107. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2017.07.010. Epub 2017 Jul 29.
5
Barriers and facilitators of access to maternal services for women with disabilities: scoping review protocol.残疾妇女获得孕产妇服务的障碍和促进因素:范围综述方案。
Syst Rev. 2017 May 16;6(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0494-7.
6
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.Rayyan——一款用于系统评价的网络和移动应用程序。
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
7
A concept analysis of critical thinking: A guide for nurse educators.批判性思维的概念分析:给护理教育工作者的指南。
Nurse Educ Today. 2017 Feb;49:106-109. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.11.007. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
8
Effectiveness of teaching strategies on the development of critical thinking in undergraduate nursing students: a meta-analysis.教学策略对本科护理专业学生批判性思维发展的有效性:一项荟萃分析。
Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2016 Apr;50(2):355-64. doi: 10.1590/S0080-623420160000200023.
9
Efficacy of teaching methods used to develop critical thinking in nursing and midwifery undergraduate students: A systematic review of the literature.用于培养护理与助产专业本科生批判性思维的教学方法的效果:文献系统综述
Nurse Educ Today. 2016 May;40:209-18. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2016.03.010. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
10
Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting.范围综述:定义、方法和报告需更加清晰。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;67(12):1291-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.03.013. Epub 2014 Jul 14.