Universidade Federal do Rio Grande, Rio Grande, Brazil.
Nurs Ethics. 2020 Jun;27(4):1157-1167. doi: 10.1177/0969733019895794. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
Professors of nursing sometimes experience specific situations in their daily practice that conflict with their values and ethical principles and may culminate in moral distress. Moral distress occurs when one is prevented from acting according to his or her knowledge or values, or what one considers to be ethically sound.
To identify the profile of professors of nursing through grouping sociodemographic characteristics and intensity of moral distress.
Cross-sectional and exploratory study addressing 373 nurses teaching in Brazilian federal public higher education institutions. Data were collected from June to December 2018 through email, using the Google Docs tool. A moral distress scale directed to nurse educators was used. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, variance analysis, and cluster analysis.
The Institutional Review Board at the Federal University of Rio Grande approved this study.
Initially, four clusters emerged for each variable predicting the profile of Brazilian professors of nursing: sex; whether the individual worked in a graduate program; age; experience in years in their respective higher education institution; and intensity of moral distress. The profile of Brazilian professors of nursing was represented by the largest cluster, 36.5% (n = 136), composed of women working in graduate programs, aged 37 years old on average, having worked in their respective institutions for approximately 5 years, and presenting a moderate intensity of moral distress.
Assigning individuals into groups facilitates seeing similarities among the predictors that compose the profile of Brazilian professors of nursing, thus recognizing those workers experiencing moral distress in their daily work routine. In addition, this study's results are expected to encourage reflection on the planning of efficacious interventions directed to the context of education and health.
护理教授在日常实践中有时会遇到与他们的价值观和道德原则冲突的特定情况,并最终导致道德困境。道德困境是指当一个人被阻止按照他或她的知识或价值观行事,或者被阻止采取他或她认为符合道德规范的行动时发生的情况。
通过分组社会人口统计学特征和道德困境的强度,确定护理教授的特征。
这是一项横断面和探索性研究,涉及 373 名在巴西联邦公立高等教育机构任教的护士。数据于 2018 年 6 月至 12 月通过电子邮件收集,使用 Google Docs 工具。使用了一种针对护理教育者的道德困境量表。使用描述性统计、方差分析和聚类分析对数据进行分析。
联邦大学里约格兰德分校的机构审查委员会批准了这项研究。
最初,对于每个预测巴西护理教授特征的变量,都出现了四个聚类:性别;个人是否在研究生项目中工作;年龄;在各自高等教育机构的工作经验年限;以及道德困境的强度。巴西护理教授的特征由最大的聚类表示,占 36.5%(n = 136),由在研究生项目中工作的女性组成,平均年龄为 37 岁,在各自的机构工作了大约 5 年,并且表现出中度的道德困境。
将个体分组有助于看到构成巴西护理教授特征的预测因素之间的相似之处,从而识别出那些在日常工作中经历道德困境的人。此外,这项研究的结果预计将鼓励对针对教育和卫生背景的有效干预措施进行规划的反思。