在新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性和息肉状脉络膜血管病变中,长期转换雷珠单抗和阿柏西普。
Long-term switching between ranibizumab and aflibercept in neovascular age-related macular degeneration and polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.
机构信息
Department of Ophthalmology, Kim's Eye Hospital, #156 Youngdeungpo-dong 4ga, Youngdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 150-034, South Korea.
出版信息
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2020 Aug;258(8):1677-1685. doi: 10.1007/s00417-020-04710-y. Epub 2020 May 2.
PURPOSE
To investigate the rate and timing of switching between ranibizumab and aflibercept and to evaluate the difference in the switching rates among the different subtypes of neovascularization.
METHODS
This retrospective study included 386 patients (386 eyes) who had been diagnosed with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD) or polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV) and treated with ranibizumab (ranibizumab group, n = 260) or aflibercept (aflibercept group, n = 126). The rate and timing of switching from ranibizumab to aflibercept or vice versa were evaluated. Within the ranibizumab and the aflibercept groups, the switching rates were compared among the 3 subtypes of neovascularization: PCV, type 1 or 2 neovascularization, and type 3 neovascularization.
RESULTS
During the mean 44.9 ± 15.9 months of follow-up period, switching rate was significantly higher in the ranibizumab group (28.8%, 75 patients) than in the aflibercept group (9.5%, 12 patients) (P < 0.001). No difference was observed in the mean duration between the diagnosis and switching among the ranibizumab (18.7 ± 14.6 months) and the aflibercept groups (14.8 ± 14.5 months) (P = 0.379). In the ranibizumab group, the switching rate was markedly higher in PCV (39.6%) than in type 1 or 2 neovascularization (17.6%) or in type 3 neovascularization (13.3%) (P < 0.001). In the aflibercept group, there was no significant difference in the switching rates among the subtypes of neovascularization (P = 0.811).
CONCLUSIONS
Although the timings of switching were similar, switching rate was higher in patients undergoing ranibizumab therapy than in those undergoing aflibercept therapy. The switching rate was especially higher in PCV patients undergoing ranibizumab therapy.
目的
研究雷珠单抗和阿柏西普之间转换的比率和时间,并评估不同新生血管亚型之间转换率的差异。
方法
本回顾性研究纳入了 386 名(386 只眼)被诊断为年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)或息肉样脉络膜血管病变(PCV)并接受雷珠单抗(雷珠单抗组,n=260)或阿柏西普(阿柏西普组,n=126)治疗的患者。评估了从雷珠单抗转换为阿柏西普或反之的转换率和时间。在雷珠单抗和阿柏西普组内,比较了 3 种新生血管亚型(PCV、1 型或 2 型新生血管和 3 型新生血管)之间的转换率。
结果
在平均 44.9±15.9 个月的随访期间,雷珠单抗组(28.8%,75 例)的转换率明显高于阿柏西普组(9.5%,12 例)(P<0.001)。雷珠单抗(18.7±14.6 个月)和阿柏西普组(14.8±14.5 个月)之间的诊断和转换之间的平均时间无差异(P=0.379)。在雷珠单抗组中,PCV(39.6%)的转换率明显高于 1 型或 2 型新生血管(17.6%)或 3 型新生血管(13.3%)(P<0.001)。在阿柏西普组中,不同新生血管亚型之间的转换率无显著差异(P=0.811)。
结论
尽管转换的时间相似,但雷珠单抗治疗的患者转换率高于阿柏西普治疗的患者。雷珠单抗治疗的 PCV 患者的转换率尤其更高。