Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK
Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London, UK.
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Sep;5(9). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002464.
The treatment of cardiovascular disease (CVD) is managed inadequately globally. Theoretically informed frameworks have the potential to account for the multiple elements which constitute the CVD patient pathway, and capture their inter-relationships and processes of change. However, a review and critique of such frameworks is currently lacking. This systematic review aims to identify and critically assess frameworks of access to and utilisation of care which capture the pathways of patients diagnosed with one or more CVDs. The specific objectives are to (1) review how existing frameworks have been used and adapted to capture CVD patient pathways and (2) draw on elements of Strong Structuration Theory to critically appraise them, in terms of their ability to capture the dynamics of the patient journey and the factors that influence it. Five bibliographic databases were searched in January 2019. We included qualitative and quantitative studies containing frameworks used to capture the patient pathway of individuals with CVD, encompassing symptoms, diagnosis, treatment and long-term management. Data on patient behaviour and structural factors were interpreted according to elements of Strong Structuration Theory to assess frameworks on their ability to capture a holistic patient journey. The search yielded 15 articles. The majority were quantitative and all focused on management of CVDs, primarily hypertension. Commonly used frameworks included the common-sense self-regulation model, transtheoretical model and theory of planned behaviour. A critique drawing on elements of Strong Structuration Theory revealed these frameworks narrowly focused on patient attributes (patient beliefs/attitudes) and resulting patient action, but neglected external structures that interacted with these to produce particular outcomes, which results in an individualistic and linear view of the patient pathway. We suggest that a framework informed by Strong Structuration Theory is sufficiently flexible to examine the patient pathway, while avoiding a strict linear view facilitated by other frameworks.
全球范围内,心血管疾病(CVD)的治疗效果并不理想。理论指导框架有可能解释构成 CVD 患者治疗途径的多个要素,并捕捉它们之间的相互关系和变化过程。然而,目前缺乏对这些框架的审查和批判。本系统评价旨在确定和批判性评估获取和利用护理的框架,以捕捉诊断出一种或多种 CVD 的患者的途径。具体目标是:(1)审查现有框架如何被使用和改编以捕捉 CVD 患者途径;(2)借鉴强结构理论的要素,从捕捉患者旅程动态和影响因素的能力方面对其进行批判性评估。2019 年 1 月,我们在五个文献数据库中进行了搜索。我们纳入了包含用于捕捉 CVD 患者途径的个体的框架的定性和定量研究,涵盖症状、诊断、治疗和长期管理。根据强结构理论的要素,对患者行为和结构因素的数据进行解释,以评估框架捕捉整体患者旅程的能力。检索结果得到了 15 篇文章。其中大多数是定量的,且均集中于 CVD 管理,主要是高血压的管理。常用的框架包括常识自我调节模型、跨理论模型和计划行为理论。基于强结构理论要素的批判揭示了这些框架狭隘地关注患者属性(患者信念/态度)和由此产生的患者行为,但忽略了与这些属性相互作用产生特定结果的外部结构,从而导致了对患者途径的个体化和线性看法。我们建议,强结构理论指导的框架足够灵活,可以检查患者途径,同时避免其他框架提供的严格线性观点。