Bioscientia Labor Ingelheim, Konrad-Adenauer-Straße 17, 55218 Ingelheim, Germany.
Department of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Saarland University, Kirrbergerstr. 100 Geb. 43, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Mar;27(3):473.e1-473.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.11.033. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
Elite professional football players and staff are a unique group that might give insight into the epidemiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections in Germany and thus can serve as a model for geographical distribution and an estimation of undetected infections.
In this prospective cohort study seroprevalence was determined twice in May and June 2020 in players and staff from the German Bundesliga. As screening assays, a commercial ELISA (Euroimmun) and a chemiluminescent immunoassay (CLIA) (Roche) were used, and an in-house neutralization assay (NT) was used as reference standard. Participants were tested twice weekly using PCR from nasopharyngeal and/or oropharyngeal swabs.
Seroprevalence (NT used as confirmation) in 2164 samples from 1184 players and staff was rather similar in May (23/1157, 1.99%) and June (21/1007, 2.09%). All participants were PCR-negative during the study period. Significant regional differences in seroprevalence were not observed. When comparing seroprevalence with the cumulative incidence of infections derived from the German notification system (subgroup matching to cohort; men, age 20-69 years), IgG was found eight to ten times more frequently, pointing to a high rate of undetected infection. ELISA and CLIA correlated only moderately (κ 0.52).
Seroprevalence with a high-quality diagnostic in Germany seemed to be around 2%. The number of undetected infections seems to be eight to ten times higher than in notification data. The quality of antibody assays is rather variable, thus results should ideally be confirmed at least by a second assay to prove IgG positivity.
精英职业足球运动员和工作人员是一个独特的群体,他们可能能够深入了解德国严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 (SARS-CoV-2) 感染的流行病学情况,因此可以作为地理分布和估计未检测到的感染的模型。
在这项前瞻性队列研究中,2020 年 5 月和 6 月,对德国德甲联赛的球员和工作人员进行了两次血清流行率检测。作为筛选检测方法,使用了一种商业 ELISA(Euroimmun)和一种化学发光免疫分析(CLIA)(罗氏),并使用内部中和检测(NT)作为参考标准。每周两次使用鼻咽和/或口咽拭子的 PCR 对参与者进行检测。
在 1184 名球员和工作人员的 2164 份样本中,使用 NT 作为确认的血清流行率(5 月为 1157 例中的 23 例,1.99%;6 月为 1007 例中的 21 例,2.09%)在 5 月和 6 月之间相当相似。研究期间所有参与者的 PCR 均为阴性。未观察到血清流行率的显著区域差异。当将血清流行率与德国通报系统得出的感染累积发病率进行比较(与队列相匹配的亚组;男性,20-69 岁)时,IgG 出现的频率高出 8 至 10 倍,表明存在大量未检测到的感染。ELISA 和 CLIA 的相关性仅为中等(κ=0.52)。
德国使用高质量诊断方法的血清流行率似乎在 2%左右。未检测到的感染数量似乎比通报数据高出 8 至 10 倍。抗体检测的质量差异很大,因此结果最好至少通过第二种检测方法来证实 IgG 阳性。