REVAL-Rehabilitation Research Center, Faculty of Rehabilitation Sciences, Hasselt University, Building A, 3590, AgoralaanDiepenbeek, Belgium.
BIOMED-Biomedical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium.
Sports Med. 2021 Mar;51(3):379-389. doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01392-8.
In the treatment of obesity in adults, exercise intervention is recommended and some people with obesity even prefer exercise above dietary intervention as a single weight-loss strategy. However, evidence is accumulating that the long-term body weight and adipose tissue mass loss as a result of exercise intervention in these individuals is disappointingly small. Although this could be related to various clinical reasons, more recent evidence reveals that also (patho)physiological abnormalities are involved which cannot be remediated by exercise intervention, especially in metabolically compromised patients. As a result, the role and importance of exercise intervention in the treatment of obesity deserve significant reconsideration to avoid confusion and disappointment amongst clinicians, patients and society. Hence, to reduce adipose tissue mass and body weight, dietary intervention is much more effective than exercise intervention, and is, therefore, of key importance in this endeavour. However, dietary interventions must be supplemented by exercise training to induce clinically relevant changes in specific cardiovascular or metabolic risk factors like blood pressure, blood triglycerides and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations, as well as visceral adipose tissue mass, physical fitness, muscle mass and strength, quality of life and life expectancy. This allows individuals with obesity to preserve their cardiometabolic health or to shift from a metabolically unhealthy phenotype to a metabolically healthy phenotype. Signifying the true clinical value of exercise interventions might lead to a better understanding and appreciation of the goals and associated effects when implemented in the multidisciplinary treatment of obesity, for which a proper tailoring of exercise prescription is required.
在成年人肥胖的治疗中,建议进行运动干预,甚至有些人更喜欢将运动干预作为单一的减肥策略,而不是饮食干预。然而,有越来越多的证据表明,对于这些人来说,运动干预导致的长期体重和脂肪组织量的减少令人失望地很小。虽然这可能与各种临床原因有关,但最近的证据表明,(病理)生理异常也参与其中,这些异常不能通过运动干预来纠正,尤其是在代谢受损的患者中。因此,运动干预在肥胖治疗中的作用和重要性值得重新考虑,以避免临床医生、患者和社会的困惑和失望。因此,为了减少脂肪组织量和体重,饮食干预比运动干预更有效,因此,在这方面非常重要。然而,饮食干预必须辅以运动训练,以引起血压、血液甘油三酯和高密度脂蛋白胆固醇浓度以及内脏脂肪组织量、身体适应性、肌肉量和力量、生活质量和预期寿命等特定心血管或代谢风险因素的临床相关变化。这使肥胖者能够保持其心血管代谢健康,或从代谢不健康的表型转变为代谢健康的表型。运动干预的真正临床价值的体现可能会导致人们更好地理解和欣赏其目标和相关影响,从而在肥胖的多学科治疗中实施,这需要对运动处方进行适当的调整。