根据 RIGHT 清单评估痛风和高尿酸血症临床实践指南报告质量的系统评价。

Reporting quality of clinical practice guidelines regarding gout and hyperuricemia according to the RIGHT checklist: systematic review.

机构信息

Gout Laboratory, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, No.16 Jiangsu Road, Qingdao, China.

School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 5;10(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01645-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare (RIGHT) checklist was used to assess the reporting quality of 2009-2019 clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) regarding gout and hyperuricemia, aimed to improve the reporting quality of future guidelines.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, the Chinese Biomedical Literature database, the Wanfang Database, and the China National Knowledge Infrastructure from January 2009 to June 2019 for guidelines regarding gout and hyperuricemia. We also searched the websites of guideline development organizations (the Guidelines International Network, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, the American College of Rheumatology, and the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)). Furthermore, supplementary guidelines reported in included articles were systematically searched, as well as Google Scholar.

RESULTS

Seventeen guidelines were included, of which one was in Chinese and 16 were in English. The mean reporting rate of the 35 items specified was 14.9 (42.5%); only five CPGs (29.4%) had a reporting rate >50%. Of the 35 items, three were very frequently reported. The reporting proportion of the seven domains (basic information, background, evidence, recommendations, review and quality assurance, funding and declaration and management of interests, and other information) were 64.7%, 36.8%, 50.6%, 42.9%, 8.82%, 33.8%, and 31.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The reporting quality of the present guidelines for gout and hyperuricemia is relatively poor. We suggest that the RIGHT reporting checklist should be used by CPG developers to ensure higher reporting quality of future guidelines.

摘要

背景

使用实践指南报告条目(RIGHT)清单评估了 2009 年至 2019 年有关痛风和高尿酸血症的临床实践指南(CPG)的报告质量,旨在提高未来指南的报告质量。

方法

我们从 2009 年 1 月至 2019 年 6 月,在 PubMed、中国生物医学文献数据库、万方数据库和中国知识基础设施中,检索了有关痛风和高尿酸血症的指南。我们还检索了指南制定组织(指南国际网络、国家卫生与临床卓越研究所、美国风湿病学会和欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR))的网站。此外,还系统地检索了纳入文章中报告的补充指南以及 Google Scholar。

结果

共纳入 17 项指南,其中 1 项为中文,16 项为英文。35 项指定项目的平均报告率为 14.9(42.5%);只有 5 项 CPG(29.4%)的报告率>50%。在 35 项中,有 3 项被频繁报告。七个领域(基本信息、背景、证据、建议、审查和质量保证、资金和声明以及利益管理、其他信息)的报告比例分别为 64.7%、36.8%、50.6%、42.9%、8.82%、33.8%和 31.4%。

结论

目前有关痛风和高尿酸血症的指南报告质量相对较差。我们建议,CPG 开发者应使用 RIGHT 报告清单,以确保未来指南具有更高的报告质量。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d6ce/8022392/98adf8997c20/13643_2021_1645_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索