Hatta Waku, Koike Tomoyuki, Takahashi So, Shimada Tomohiro, Hikichi Takuto, Toya Yosuke, Tanaka Ippei, Onozato Yusuke, Hamada Koichi, Fukushi Daisuke, Watanabe Ko, Kayaba Shoichi, Ito Hirotaka, Mikami Tatsuya, Oikawa Tomoyuki, Takahashi Yasushi, Kondo Yutaka, Yoshimura Tetsuro, Shiroki Takeharu, Nagino Ko, Hanabata Norihiro, Funakubo Akira, Hirasawa Dai, Ohira Tetsuya, Nakamura Jun, Matsumoto Takayuki, Nakamura Tomohiro, Nakaya Naoki, Iijima Katsunori, Fukuda Shinsaku, Masamune Atsushi
Division of Gastroenterology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan.
Department of Gastroenterology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita, Japan.
J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul;56(7):620-632. doi: 10.1007/s00535-021-01787-y. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
We aimed to elucidate the risk of metastatic recurrence after endoscopic resection (ER) without additional treatment for esophageal squamous cell carcinomas (ESCCs) with tumor invasion into the muscularis mucosa (pT1a-MM) or submucosa (T1b-SM).
We retrospectively enrolled patients with pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM ESCC after ER at 21 institutions in Japan between 2006 and 2017. We compared metastatic recurrence between patients with and without additional treatment, stratified into category A (pT1a-MM with negative lymphovascular invasion [LVI] and vertical margin [VM]), B (tumor invasion into the submucosa ≤ 200 µm [pT1b-SM1] with negative LVI and VM), and C (others). Subsequently, using multivariate Cox analysis, we evaluated risk factors for metastatic recurrence after ER without additional treatment.
We enrolled 593 patients, and metastatic recurrence occurred in 38 patients. Metastatic recurrence after additional treatment was significantly lower than that after no additional treatment in category C (9.1% vs. 23.6% in 5 years, p = 0.001), whereas no significant difference was noted in categories A (0.0% vs. 2.6%) and B (0.0% vs. 4.3%). In patients without additional treatment after ER, risk factors for metastatic recurrence were lymphatic invasion (hazard ratio [HR], 5.61), positive VM (HR, 4.55), and tumor invasion into the submucosa > 200 μm (HR, 3.25), and, but near half of the patients with metastatic recurrence had no further recurrence after salvage treatment, resulting in excellent 5-year disease-specific survival in categories A (99.6%) and B (100.0%).
Closed follow-up with no additional treatment may be an acceptable option after ER in pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM1 ESCC with negative LVI and VM.
我们旨在阐明对于肿瘤侵犯黏膜肌层(pT1a-MM)或黏膜下层(T1b-SM)的食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC),在内镜切除(ER)后不进行额外治疗时发生转移复发的风险。
我们回顾性纳入了2006年至2017年间在日本21家机构接受ER治疗的pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM ESCC患者。我们比较了接受和未接受额外治疗的患者之间的转移复发情况,将其分为A组(pT1a-MM且无淋巴管浸润[LVI]和垂直切缘[VM]阳性)、B组(肿瘤侵犯黏膜下层≤200μm[pT1b-SM1]且无LVI和VM阳性)和C组(其他)。随后,我们使用多变量Cox分析评估了ER后不进行额外治疗时转移复发的危险因素。
我们纳入了593例患者,其中38例发生了转移复发。在C组中,接受额外治疗后的转移复发率显著低于未接受额外治疗的患者(5年时分别为9.1%和23.6%,p = 0.001),而在A组(0.0%对2.6%)和B组(0.0%对4.3%)中未观察到显著差异。在ER后未接受额外治疗的患者中,转移复发的危险因素包括淋巴管浸润(风险比[HR],5.61)、VM阳性(HR,4.55)和肿瘤侵犯黏膜下层>200μm(HR,3.25),并且,但近一半发生转移复发的患者在挽救治疗后未进一步复发,导致A组(99.6%)和B组(100.0%)的5年疾病特异性生存率极佳。
对于LVI和VM阴性的pT1a-MM/pT1b-SM1 ESCC,ER后不进行额外治疗而进行密切随访可能是一种可接受的选择。