代理报告的生活空间评估在有和没有认知障碍的机构老年人中的心理测量特性(LSA-IS-Proxy)。

Psychometric Properties of the Proxy-Reported Life-Space Assessment in Institutionalized Settings (LSA-IS-Proxy) for Older Persons with and without Cognitive Impairment.

机构信息

Agaplesion Bethanien Hospital Heidelberg/Geriatric Center at the Heidelberg University, and Center of Geriatric Medicine, Heidelberg University, 69126 Heidelberg, Germany.

Network Aging Research (NAR), Heidelberg University, 69115 Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 7;18(8):3872. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083872.

Abstract

(1) Background: Life-space mobility assessments for institutionalized settings are scarce and there is a lack of comprehensive validation and focus on persons with cognitive impairment (CI). This study aims to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Life-Space Assessment for Institutionalized Settings by proxy informants (LSA-IS-proxy) for institutionalized, older persons, with and without CI. (2) Methods: Concurrent validity against the self-reported version of the LSA-IS, construct validity with established construct variables, test-retest reliability, sensitivity to change during early multidisciplinary geriatric rehabilitation treatment, and feasibility (completion rate, floor/ceiling effects) of the LSA-IS-proxy, were assessed in 94 hospitalized geriatric patients (83.3 ± 6.1 years), with and without CI. (3) Results: The LSA-IS-proxy total score showed good-to-excellent agreement with the self-reported LSA-IS (Intraclass Correlations Coefficient, ICC = 0.77), predominantly expected small-to-high correlations with construct variables ( = 0.21-0.59), good test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.74), significant sensitivity to change over the treatment period (18.5 ± 7.9 days; < 0.001, standardized response mean = 0.44), and excellent completion rates (100%) with no floor/ceiling effects. These results were predominantly confirmed for the sub-scores of the LSA-IS-proxy and were comparable between the sub-groups with different cognitive status. (4) Conclusions: The LSA-IS-proxy has proven to be feasible, valid, reliable, and sensitive to change in hospitalized, geriatric patients with and without CI.

摘要

(1)背景:针对机构环境的生活空间流动性评估很少,并且缺乏针对认知障碍(CI)患者的全面验证和关注。本研究旨在评估通过代理报告者对机构化环境下的生活空间评估(LSA-IS-proxy)对有和没有 CI 的机构化老年患者的心理测量特性。(2)方法:在 94 名住院老年患者(83.3 ± 6.1 岁)中,评估了 LSA-IS-proxy 与自我报告的 LSA-IS 的同时效性、与既定结构变量的结构有效性、测试-再测试可靠性、在早期多学科老年康复治疗过程中的变化敏感性,以及 LSA-IS-proxy 的可行性(完成率、地板/天花板效应),这些患者中有和没有 CI。(3)结果:LSA-IS-proxy 总分与自我报告的 LSA-IS 具有良好到极好的一致性(组内相关系数,ICC = 0.77),与结构变量主要呈现预期的小到高相关性( = 0.21-0.59),测试-再测试可靠性良好(ICC = 0.74),在治疗期间变化敏感(18.5 ± 7.9 天; < 0.001,标准化反应均值 = 0.44),并且完成率很高(100%),没有地板/天花板效应。这些结果主要在 LSA-IS-proxy 的子量表中得到证实,并且在不同认知状态的亚组之间具有可比性。(4)结论:LSA-IS-proxy 已被证明在有和没有 CI 的住院老年患者中是可行的、有效的、可靠的和对变化敏感的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/100a/8067867/a58d785e9185/ijerph-18-03872-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索