自身反应性强迫症亚型之间的氧化应激和炎症过程是否存在差异?一项对照性横断面研究。
Are there differences in oxidative stress and inflammatory processes between the autogenous and reactive subtypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder? A controlled cross-sectional study.
机构信息
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Ağrı Training and Research Hospital, Ağrı, Turkey.
Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Turkey.
出版信息
Braz J Psychiatry. 2022 Mar-Abr;44(2):171-177. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2021-1740.
OBJECTIVE
To date, no study has investigated whether autogenous and reactive obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) types are different entities in terms of oxidative stress and inflammatory processes. The aim of this study is to compare them in terms of these features.
METHODS
The study was conducted in subjects with reactive OCD (n=19), autogenous OCD (n=14), and a control group (n=17). All participants were non-smokers. Sociodemographic data were collected and the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Obsessive Beliefs Questionnaire (OBQ), and Overvalued Ideas Scale (OVIS) were administered. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-10 (IL-10), paraoxonase (PON1), total oxidant status (TOS), and total antioxidant status (TAS) were measured.
RESULTS
There were no significant differences in TAS, TOS, or oxidative stress index (OSI) between the OCD and control groups. PON1 and hs-CRP levels were higher in the OCD group, whereas IL-6 and IL-10 levels were lower. Comparison across the three groups revealed no differences in TAS, TOS, OSI, or PON1 levels; however, hs-CRP was significantly higher while IL-6 and IL-10 were significantly lower in the reactive group compared to controls.
CONCLUSION
Our results show that, although inflammatory processes may play a role in OCD, the autogenous and reactive subtypes do not differ from each other in these respects. The classification of OCD into autogenous and reactive subtypes should be reevaluated.
目的
迄今为止,尚无研究调查自体和反应性强迫症(OCD)类型在氧化应激和炎症过程方面是否为不同实体。本研究旨在比较它们在这些特征方面的差异。
方法
该研究在反应性 OCD 患者(n=19)、自体 OCD 患者(n=14)和对照组(n=17)中进行。所有参与者均为非吸烟者。收集人口统计学数据,并进行耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(Y-BOCS)、贝克焦虑量表(BAI)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、强迫观念问卷(OBQ)和过度观念量表(OVIS)评估。测量高敏 C 反应蛋白(hs-CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、白细胞介素-10(IL-10)、对氧磷酶(PON1)、总氧化剂状态(TOS)和总抗氧化状态(TAS)。
结果
OCD 组和对照组之间 TAS、TOS 或氧化应激指数(OSI)均无显著差异。OCD 组的 PON1 和 hs-CRP 水平较高,而 IL-6 和 IL-10 水平较低。三组之间的比较显示,TAS、TOS、OSI 或 PON1 水平无差异;然而,与对照组相比,反应组的 hs-CRP 显著升高,而 IL-6 和 IL-10 显著降低。
结论
我们的结果表明,尽管炎症过程可能在 OCD 中起作用,但自体和反应性亚型在这些方面没有差异。应重新评估 OCD 分为自体和反应性亚型的分类。