• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用可穿戴设备监测瓣膜置换术后患者报告的结局:可行性和能力研究的见解:可行性结果。

Monitoring Patients Reported Outcomes after Valve Replacement Using Wearable Devices: Insights on Feasibility and Capability Study: Feasibility Results.

机构信息

Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35121 Padova, Italy.

Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, University of Padua Medical School, 35121 Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 4;18(13):7171. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137171.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18137171
PMID:34281108
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8297062/
Abstract

Wearable devices (WDs) can objectively assess patient-reported outcomes (PROMs) in clinical trials. In this study, the feasibility and acceptability of using commercial WDs in elderly patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) will be explored. This is a prospective observational study. Participants were trained to use a WD and a smartphone to collect data on their physical activity, rest heart rate and number of hours of sleep. Validated questionnaires were also used to evaluate these outcomes. A technology acceptance questionnaire was used at the end of the follow up. In our participants an overall good compliance in wearing the device (75.1% vs. 79.8%, SAVR vs. TAVR) was assessed. Half of the patients were willing to continue using the device. Perceived ease of use is one of the domains that scored higher in the technology acceptance questionnaire. In this study we observed that the use of a WD is accepted in our frail population for an extended period. Even though commercial WDs are not tailored for clinical research, they can produce useful information on patient behavior, especially when coordinated with intervention tailored to the single patient.

摘要

可穿戴设备(WDs)可客观评估临床试验中的患者报告结局(PROMs)。本研究旨在探讨在接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)或外科主动脉瓣置换术(SAVR)的老年患者中使用商业 WDs 的可行性和可接受性。这是一项前瞻性观察研究。参与者接受培训,使用 WD 和智能手机来收集其身体活动、静息心率和睡眠时间的数据。还使用了经过验证的问卷来评估这些结果。在随访结束时使用了技术接受问卷。在我们的参与者中,评估了佩戴设备的总体良好依从性(75.1% vs. 79.8%,SAVR 与 TAVR)。一半的患者愿意继续使用该设备。感知易用性是技术接受问卷中得分较高的领域之一。在这项研究中,我们观察到 WDs 在我们的虚弱人群中可以接受长期使用。尽管商业 WDs 并非专为临床研究设计,但它们可以提供有关患者行为的有用信息,尤其是当与针对单个患者的干预措施协调使用时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92bd/8297062/9bdf8a2a4bc7/ijerph-18-07171-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92bd/8297062/e6da921905ea/ijerph-18-07171-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92bd/8297062/02533636b8e5/ijerph-18-07171-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92bd/8297062/348e61e54a21/ijerph-18-07171-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92bd/8297062/ec3cf705fa2f/ijerph-18-07171-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92bd/8297062/9bdf8a2a4bc7/ijerph-18-07171-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92bd/8297062/e6da921905ea/ijerph-18-07171-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92bd/8297062/02533636b8e5/ijerph-18-07171-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92bd/8297062/348e61e54a21/ijerph-18-07171-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92bd/8297062/ec3cf705fa2f/ijerph-18-07171-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/92bd/8297062/9bdf8a2a4bc7/ijerph-18-07171-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Monitoring Patients Reported Outcomes after Valve Replacement Using Wearable Devices: Insights on Feasibility and Capability Study: Feasibility Results.使用可穿戴设备监测瓣膜置换术后患者报告的结局:可行性和能力研究的见解:可行性结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 4;18(13):7171. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137171.
2
Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Among Patients With Aortic Stenosis at Low Operative Risk.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗低手术风险主动脉瓣狭窄患者的结局比较。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Jun 5;2(6):e195742. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5742.
3
Using Wearable Devices to Monitor Physical Activity in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study.使用可穿戴设备监测主动脉瓣置换术患者的身体活动:一项前瞻性观察性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Nov 12;9(11):e20072. doi: 10.2196/20072.
4
Health Status Benefits of Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis at Intermediate Surgical Risk: Results From the PARTNER 2 Randomized Clinical Trial.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术治疗中度外科手术风险严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的健康状况获益:PARTNER 2 随机临床试验结果。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;2(8):837-845. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.2039.
5
In-hospital outcomes after transcatheter or surgical aortic valve replacement in younger patients less than 75 years old: a propensity-matched comparison.75 岁以下年轻患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术或外科主动脉瓣置换术后的院内转归:倾向评分匹配比较。
EuroIntervention. 2018 May 20;14(1):50-57. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-01051.
6
Comparison of Outcomes After Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement Among Patients at Intermediate Operative Risk With a History of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Post Hoc Analysis of the SURTAVI Randomized Clinical Trial.经冠状动脉旁路移植术史的中危手术风险患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的结局比较:SURTAVI 随机临床试验的事后分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Aug 1;4(8):810-814. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.1856.
7
Computed Tomography-Based Indexed Aortic Annulus Size to Predict Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch.基于计算机断层扫描的主动脉瓣环大小指数预测人工瓣膜-患者不匹配。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr;12(4):e007396. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007396.
8
Changes in Risk Profile and Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement From the Pre- to Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Eras.从经导管主动脉瓣置换术前到术后时代,接受外科主动脉瓣置换术患者的风险状况和结局变化。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Jan;101(1):110-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.06.083. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
9
In-hospital outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in end stage renal disease.终末期肾病患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的院内转归比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Oct 1;92(4):757-765. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27433. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
10
Conventional surgery, sutureless valves, and transapical aortic valve replacement: what is the best option for patients with aortic valve stenosis? A multicenter, propensity-matched analysis.传统手术、无缝合瓣膜和经心尖主动脉瓣置换术:对于主动脉瓣狭窄患者,哪种方法最佳?一项多中心、倾向评分匹配分析。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1065-70; discussion 1070-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.06.047. Epub 2013 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation and Replacement: The Latest Advances and Prospects.经导管主动脉瓣植入与置换:最新进展与前景
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 9;14(6):1844. doi: 10.3390/jcm14061844.
2
Digital Health Technologies in Pediatric Infectious Disease and the Perspective of Patients and Healthcare Professionals: A Review.儿科传染病中的数字健康技术以及患者和医疗保健专业人员的观点:综述
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 2;8(3):e70514. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70514. eCollection 2025 Mar.
3
Implementing sensor-based digital health technologies in clinical trials: Key considerations from the eCOA Consortium.

本文引用的文献

1
Usability and Accuracy of a Smartwatch for the Assessment of Physical Activity in the Elderly Population: Observational Study.智能手表评估老年人身体活动的可用性和准确性:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 May 5;9(5):e20966. doi: 10.2196/20966.
2
Using Wearable Devices to Monitor Physical Activity in Patients Undergoing Aortic Valve Replacement: Protocol for a Prospective Observational Study.使用可穿戴设备监测主动脉瓣置换术患者的身体活动:一项前瞻性观察性研究方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Nov 12;9(11):e20072. doi: 10.2196/20072.
3
Comparison of Older and Younger Adults' Attitudes Toward the Adoption and Use of Activity Trackers.
在临床试验中实施基于传感器的数字健康技术:eCOA 联盟的主要考虑因素。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Nov;17(11):e70054. doi: 10.1111/cts.70054.
4
Percutaneous Valvular and Structural Heart Disease Interventions. 2024 Core Curriculum of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI) of the ESC in collaboration with the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the Cardiovascular Surgery Working Group (WG CVS) of the European Society of Cardiology.经皮瓣膜与结构性心脏病介入治疗。欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)经皮心血管介入治疗欧洲协会(EAPCI)2024年核心课程,与欧洲心血管影像协会(EACVI)及欧洲心脏病学会心血管外科工作组(WG CVS)合作编写。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Aug 30;20(22):1370-9. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00983.
5
Ambulatory Smartwatch ECG Monitoring among Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Early after Discharge: An Observational Study.出院后早期接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的动态智能手表心电图监测:一项观察性研究
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 4;24(1):11. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2401011. eCollection 2023 Jan.
6
Effective health management strategies for patients undergoing valve replacement: a bibliometric analysis of the current research status and future directions.瓣膜置换患者的有效健康管理策略:当前研究现状与未来方向的文献计量分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 26;11:1352437. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1352437. eCollection 2024.
7
A Call to Expand the Scope of Digital Phenotyping.呼吁拓展数字表型学的研究范畴
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Mar 14;25:e39546. doi: 10.2196/39546.
8
Factors Affecting the Usage of Wearable Device Technology for Healthcare among Indian Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.影响印度成年人在医疗保健中使用可穿戴设备技术的因素:一项横断面研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 28;11(23):7019. doi: 10.3390/jcm11237019.
9
Improving Healthy Aging by Monitoring Patients' Lifestyle through a Wearable Device: Results of a Feasibility Study.通过可穿戴设备监测患者生活方式以改善健康老龄化:一项可行性研究的结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 17;18(18):9806. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189806.
10
Sleep Quality in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI).经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)患者的睡眠质量。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 23;18(16):8889. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168889.
老年人和年轻人对采用和使用活动追踪器的态度比较。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 22;8(10):e18312. doi: 10.2196/18312.
4
Patterns of Use and Key Predictors for the Use of Wearable Health Care Devices by US Adults: Insights from a National Survey.美国成年人使用可穿戴医疗设备的模式及关键预测因素:一项全国性调查的见解
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 16;22(10):e22443. doi: 10.2196/22443.
5
Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review.市面上可用于测量步数、能量消耗和心率的可穿戴设备的可靠性和有效性:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Sep 8;8(9):e18694. doi: 10.2196/18694.
6
Succeeding with prolonged usage of consumer-based activity trackers in clinical studies: a mixed methods approach.在临床研究中成功使用基于消费者的活动追踪器:混合方法研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Aug 27;20(1):1300. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09406-w.
7
A feasibility study of an unsupervised, pre-operative exercise program for adults with lung cancer.一项针对肺癌成年人的非监督性术前运动计划的可行性研究。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2020 Jul;29(4):e13254. doi: 10.1111/ecc.13254. Epub 2020 May 29.
8
A Systematic Review on the Use of Wearable Body Sensors for Health Monitoring: A Qualitative Synthesis.穿戴式身体传感器在健康监测中的应用:系统评价与定性综合。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 9;20(5):1502. doi: 10.3390/s20051502.
9
Meta-Analysis of Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Low Surgical Risk Patients.经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术在低手术风险患者中的荟萃分析。
Am J Cardiol. 2020 Apr 15;125(8):1230-1238. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.01.017. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
10
Validity Evaluation of the Fitbit Charge2 and the Garmin vivosmart HR+ in Free-Living Environments in an Older Adult Cohort.在老年人群体的自然生活环境中评估 Fitbit Charge2 和 Garmin vivosmart HR+ 的有效性。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jun 19;7(6):e13084. doi: 10.2196/13084.