Suppr超能文献

基于嗜酸乳杆菌存活率和功能及咖啡因释放的不同胶囊聚合物组合的保护和释放行为的比较。

Comparison of protection and release behavior of different capsule polymer combinations based on L. acidophilus survivability and function and caffeine release.

机构信息

Center for Microbial Ecology and Technology (CMET), Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure Links 653, 9000 Ghent, Belgium; ProDigest bvba, Technologiepark 82, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.

ProDigest bvba, Technologiepark 82, 9052 Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Int J Pharm. 2021 Sep 25;607:120977. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120977. Epub 2021 Aug 9.

Abstract

Oral administration of active pharmaceutical ingredients, nutraceuticals, enzymes or probiotics requires an appropriate delivery system for optimal bioactivity and absorption. The harsh conditions during the gastrointestinal transit can degrade the administered products, hampering their efficacy. Enteric or delayed-release pharmaceutical formulations may help overcome these issues. In a Simulator of Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem model (SHIME) and using caffeine as a marker for release kinetics and L. acidophilus survivability as an indicator for protection, we compared the performance of ten capsule configurations, single or DUOCAP® combinations. The function of L. acidophilus and its impact on the gut microbiota was further tested in three selected capsule types, combinations of DRcaps® capsule in DRcaps® capsule (DR-in-DR) and DRcaps® capsule in Vcaps® capsule (DR-in-VC) and single Vcaps® Plus capsule under colonic conditions. We found that under stomach and small intestine conditions, DR-in-DR and DR-in-VC led to the best performance both under fed and fasted conditions based on the slow caffeine release and the highest L. acidophilus survivability. The Vcaps® Plus capsule however, led to the quickest caffeine and probiotic release. When DR-in-DR, DR-in-VC and single Vcaps® Plus capsules were tested through the whole gastrointestinal tract, including under colonic conditions, caffeine release was found to be slower in capsules containing DRcaps® capsules compared to the single Vcaps® capsules. In addition, colonic survival of L. acidophilus was significantly increased under fasted conditions in DR-in-DR or DR-in-VC formulation compared to Vcaps® Plus capsule. To assess the impact of these formulations on the microbial function, acetate, butyrate and propionate as well as ammonia were measured. L. acidophilus released from DR-in-DR or DR-in-VC induced a significant increase in butyrate and a decrease in ammonia, suggesting a proliferation of butyrate-producing bacteria and reduction in ammonia-producing bacteria. These data suggest that L. acidophilus included in DR-in-DR or DR-in-VC reaching the colon is viable and functional, potentially contributing to changes in colonic microbiota composition and diversity.

摘要

口服活性药物成分、营养保健品、酶或益生菌需要适当的递送系统,以实现最佳的生物活性和吸收。在胃肠道转运过程中,苛刻的条件会降解所给予的产品,从而影响其疗效。肠溶或延迟释放的药物制剂可能有助于克服这些问题。在模拟人体肠道微生物生态系统模型(SHIME)中,我们使用咖啡因作为释放动力学的标记物,以嗜酸乳杆菌的存活率作为保护的指标,比较了十种胶囊配方(单胶囊或 DUOCAP®组合)的性能。进一步在三种选定的胶囊类型中测试了嗜酸乳杆菌的功能及其对肠道微生物群的影响,这三种胶囊类型是:DRcaps®胶囊中的 DRcaps®胶囊(DR-in-DR)和 DRcaps®胶囊中的 Vcaps®胶囊(DR-in-VC)以及单 Vcaps® Plus 胶囊,在结肠条件下。我们发现,在胃和小肠条件下,基于咖啡因的缓慢释放和嗜酸乳杆菌的最高存活率,DR-in-DR 和 DR-in-VC 在空腹和进食条件下都表现出最佳性能。然而,Vcaps® Plus 胶囊导致咖啡因和益生菌最快释放。当通过整个胃肠道(包括结肠条件下)测试 DR-in-DR、DR-in-VC 和单 Vcaps® Plus 胶囊时,与单 Vcaps® 胶囊相比,含有 DRcaps®胶囊的胶囊中咖啡因的释放速度较慢。此外,与 Vcaps® Plus 胶囊相比,在 DR-in-DR 或 DR-in-VC 制剂中,嗜酸乳杆菌在结肠条件下的空腹条件下的存活率显著增加。为了评估这些制剂对微生物功能的影响,测量了乙酸盐、丁酸盐和丙酸盐以及氨。从 DR-in-DR 或 DR-in-VC 释放的嗜酸乳杆菌显著增加了丁酸盐的产生,并降低了氨,这表明丁酸产生菌的增殖和氨产生菌的减少。这些数据表明,到达结肠的 DR-in-DR 或 DR-in-VC 中的嗜酸乳杆菌是有活力和功能的,可能有助于改变结肠微生物群落的组成和多样性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验