社区社会经济劣势与 Medicare 受益人因急性心肌梗死、心力衰竭和肺炎住院的死亡率。
Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and Mortality Among Medicare Beneficiaries Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Heart Failure, and Pneumonia.
机构信息
Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Division of Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, MA, Boston, USA.
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
出版信息
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jun;37(8):1894-1901. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07090-z. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
BACKGROUND
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Hospital Value-Based Purchasing program uses 30-day mortality rates for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and pneumonia to evaluate US hospitals, but does not account for neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage when comparing their performance.
OBJECTIVE
To determine if neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with worse 30-day mortality rates after a hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), or pneumonia in the USA, as well as within the subset of counties with a high proportion of Black individuals.
DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS
This retrospective, population-based study included all Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries aged 65 years or older hospitalized for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, or pneumonia between 2012 and 2015.
EXPOSURE
Residence in most socioeconomically disadvantaged vs. less socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods as measured by the area deprivation index (ADI).
MAIN MEASURE(S): All-cause mortality within 30 days of admission.
KEY RESULTS
The study included 3,471,592 Medicare patients. Of these patients, 333,472 resided in most disadvantaged neighborhoods and 3,138,120 in less disadvantaged neighborhoods. Patients living in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods were younger (78.4 vs. 80.0 years) and more likely to be Black adults (24.6% vs. 7.5%) and dually enrolled in Medicaid (39.4% vs. 21.8%). After adjustment for demographics (age, sex, race/ethnicity), poverty, and clinical comorbidities, 30-day mortality was higher among beneficiaries residing in most disadvantaged neighborhoods for AMI (adjusted odds ratio 1.08, 95% CI 1.06-1.11) and pneumonia (aOR 1.05, 1.03-1.07), but not for HF (aOR 1.02, 1.00-1.04). These patterns were similar within the subset of US counties with a high proportion of Black adults (AMI, aOR 1.07, 1.03-1.11; HF 1.02, 0.99-1.05; pneumonia 1.03, 1.00-1.07).
CONCLUSIONS
Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with higher 30-day mortality for some conditions targeted by value-based programs, even after accounting for individual-level demographics, clinical comorbidities, and poverty. These findings may have implications as policymakers weigh strategies to advance health equity under value-based programs.
背景
医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心的医院价值购买计划使用急性心肌梗死、心力衰竭和肺炎的 30 天死亡率来评估美国医院,但在比较其绩效时没有考虑到邻里社会经济劣势。
目的
确定在美国,急性心肌梗死(AMI)、心力衰竭(HF)或肺炎住院后,邻里社会经济劣势是否与 30 天死亡率的恶化相关,以及在黑人群体比例较高的县的亚组中是否与 30 天死亡率的恶化相关。
设计和参与者
这是一项回顾性的基于人群的研究,纳入了 2012 年至 2015 年间所有年龄在 65 岁或以上、因急性心肌梗死、心力衰竭或肺炎住院的医疗保险费用报销受益人群。
暴露
居住在最社会经济劣势地区与较少社会经济劣势地区,以区域剥夺指数(ADI)衡量。
主要测量指标
入院后 30 天内的全因死亡率。
主要结果
研究纳入了 3471592 名医疗保险患者。其中,333472 人居住在最不利的社区,3138120 人居住在较不利的社区。居住在最不利社区的患者年龄较小(78.4 岁 vs. 80.0 岁),更可能是黑人成年人(24.6% vs. 7.5%),并且同时参加了医疗补助(39.4% vs. 21.8%)。调整人口统计学因素(年龄、性别、种族/族裔)、贫困和临床合并症后,AMI(调整后的优势比 1.08,95%CI 1.06-1.11)和肺炎(aOR 1.05,1.03-1.07)患者的 30 天死亡率在居住在最不利社区的患者中更高,但心力衰竭(aOR 1.02,1.00-1.04)患者的死亡率没有更高。在黑人成年人比例较高的美国县亚组中,这些模式是相似的(AMI,aOR 1.07,1.03-1.11;HF 1.02,0.99-1.05;肺炎 1.03,1.00-1.07)。
结论
即使考虑了个体层面的人口统计学、临床合并症和贫困,邻里社会经济劣势与某些价值为基础的项目所针对的条件的 30 天死亡率较高相关。这些发现可能对政策制定者在价值为基础的项目下权衡推进健康公平的策略具有重要意义。