Suppr超能文献

数字猩红字母:电子病历中的性传播感染。

Digital Scarlet Letters: Sexually Transmitted Infections in the Electronic Medical Record.

机构信息

From the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.

Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

出版信息

Sex Transm Dis. 2022 Jun 1;49(6):e70-e74. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000001581. Epub 2021 Nov 12.

Abstract

The harms of implicit bias in clinical settings are acknowledged but poorly understood and difficult to overcome. We discuss how structural components of electronic medical record (EMR) user interfaces may contribute to sex and gender-based discrimination against patients via constant, duplicative presentation of stigmatizing sexually transmitted infection (STI) data irrespective of clinical significance. Via comparison with symbolism and representative quotes in Hawthorne's 1850 novel The Scarlet Letter, we propose a metaphor to examine how EMRs function as a platform for moral judgment, which may display an indelible "scarlet letter" for pregnant patients with STI history. We consider whether current depictions of STIs in EMRs are structurally unjust and may contribute to biased treatment by directing attention to violations of hegemonic sex/gender norms regarding sexual behavior and thus triggering moral judgments of maternal fitness. We conclude with recommendations for how to address these challenges to improve ethical stewardship of sensitive sexual/reproductive health data.

摘要

临床环境中隐性偏见的危害已得到承认,但人们对此认识不足,且难以克服。我们讨论了电子病历 (EMR) 用户界面的结构组件如何通过不断重复呈现具有污名化的性传播感染 (STI) 数据,而不管其临床意义如何,从而导致对患者的性别歧视。通过与霍桑 1850 年小说《红字》中的象征和代表性引语进行比较,我们提出了一个隐喻来考察 EMR 如何作为道德判断的平台,这可能会为有 STI 病史的孕妇显示一个不可磨灭的“红字”。我们考虑了 EMR 中当前对 STI 的描述是否在结构上不公正,并可能通过将注意力集中在违反关于性行为的霸权性别规范上而导致有偏见的治疗,从而引发对母性健康的道德判断。最后,我们提出了一些建议,以应对这些挑战,改善对敏感的性/生殖健康数据的伦理管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验