• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三尖瓣反流速度阈值在肺动脉高压风险评估中的重要性——接受主动脉瓣置换术患者的长期预后

Importance of Tricuspid Regurgitation Velocity Threshold in Risk Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension-Long-Term Outcome of Patients Submitted to Aortic Valve Replacement.

作者信息

Garcia-Ribas Cora, Ble Mirea, Gómez Miquel, Mas-Stachurska Aleksandra, Farré-López Núria, Cladellas Mercè

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of Medicine, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Nov 10;8:720643. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.720643. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2021.720643
PMID:34859063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8631497/
Abstract

The upper physiological threshold for tricuspid regurgitation velocity (TRV) of 2.8 m/s proposed by the Pulmonary Hypertension (PH) guidelines had been questioned. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic significance of preoperative PH in patients with aortic stenosis, long-term after valve replacement, using two different TRV thresholds (2.55 and 2.8 m/s). Four hundred and forty four patients were included (mean age 73 ± 9 years; 55% male), with a median follow-up of 5.8 years (98% completed). Patients were divided into three PH probability groups according to guidelines (low, intermediate and high) for both thresholds (TRV ≤ 2.8 m/s and TRV ≤ 2.55 m/s), using right atrial area>18 cm and right ventricle/left ventricle ratio>1 as additional echocardiographic variables. In patients with measurable TRV ( = 304), the low group mortality rate was 25% and 30%, respectively for 2.55 and 2.8 m/s TRV thresholds. The intermediate group with TRV > 2.55 m/s was an independent mortality risk factor (HR 2.04; 95% CI: 1.91 to 3.48, = 0.01), in contrast to the intermediate group with TRV>2.8 m/s (HR 1.44; 95% CI: 0.89 to 2.32, = 0.14). Both high probability groups were associated with an increased mortality risk, as compared to their respective low groups. When including all patients (with measurable and non-measurable TRV), both intermediate groups remained independently associated with an increased mortality risk: HR 1.62 (95% CI 1.11 to 2.35 = 0.01) for the new cut-off point; and HR 1.43 (95% CI: 0.96 to 2.13, = 0.07) for guidelines threshold. A TRV threshold of 2.55 m/s, together with right cavities measures, allowed a better risk assessment of patients with PH secondary to severe aortic stenosis, with or without tricuspid regurgitation.

摘要

肺动脉高压(PH)指南提出的三尖瓣反流速度(TRV)2.8米/秒的生理上限受到了质疑。本研究的目的是使用两种不同的TRV阈值(2.55和2.8米/秒)评估主动脉瓣狭窄患者瓣膜置换术后长期PH的预后意义。纳入了444例患者(平均年龄73±9岁;55%为男性),中位随访时间为5.8年(98%完成随访)。根据指南(低、中、高)将患者分为三个PH概率组,两种阈值(TRV≤2.8米/秒和TRV≤2.55米/秒)均采用右心房面积>18平方厘米和右心室/左心室比率>1作为额外的超声心动图变量。在可测量TRV的患者(n = 304)中,对于2.55和2.8米/秒的TRV阈值,低概率组的死亡率分别为25%和30%。TRV>2.55米/秒的中概率组是独立的死亡风险因素(HR 2.04;95%CI:1.91至3.48,P = 0.01),而TRV>2.8米/秒的中概率组则不然(HR 1.44;95%CI:0.89至2.32,P = 0.14)。与各自的低概率组相比,两个高概率组的死亡风险均增加。当纳入所有患者(可测量和不可测量TRV)时,两个中概率组仍与死亡风险增加独立相关:新切点的HR为1.62(95%CI 1.11至2.35,P = 0.01);指南阈值的HR为1.43(95%CI:0.96至2.13,P = 0.07)。2.55米/秒的TRV阈值与右心腔测量值一起,能够更好地评估重度主动脉瓣狭窄继发PH患者(无论有无三尖瓣反流)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3639/8631497/9b4a115f87b6/fcvm-08-720643-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3639/8631497/63b8110e193b/fcvm-08-720643-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3639/8631497/207872023989/fcvm-08-720643-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3639/8631497/9b4a115f87b6/fcvm-08-720643-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3639/8631497/63b8110e193b/fcvm-08-720643-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3639/8631497/207872023989/fcvm-08-720643-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3639/8631497/9b4a115f87b6/fcvm-08-720643-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Importance of Tricuspid Regurgitation Velocity Threshold in Risk Assessment of Pulmonary Hypertension-Long-Term Outcome of Patients Submitted to Aortic Valve Replacement.三尖瓣反流速度阈值在肺动脉高压风险评估中的重要性——接受主动脉瓣置换术患者的长期预后
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Nov 10;8:720643. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.720643. eCollection 2021.
2
Impact of Preoperative Measurement of Right Heart Chambers in the Evaluation of Pulmonary Hypertension Following Aortic Valve Replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后评估肺动脉高压时右心腔术前测量的影响。
Chest. 2020 Jun;157(6):1597-1605. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.12.017. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
3
Impact of pulmonary hypertension on long-term outcome in patients with severe aortic stenosis.肺动脉高压对严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者长期预后的影响。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 May 1;19(5):553-561. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jex166.
4
Prognostic value of tricuspid regurgitation velocity and probability of pulmonary hypertension in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术患者三尖瓣反流速度的预后价值及肺动脉高压的概率
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Dec;33(12):1931-1938. doi: 10.1007/s10554-017-1210-3. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
5
Echocardiographic pulmonary hypertension probability is associated with clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经胸超声心动图评估的肺动脉高压可能性与经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的临床结局相关。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Dec 15;225:218-225. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Oct 6.
6
Association of Pulmonary Artery Pressures With Mortality in Adults With Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction.肺动脉压力与射血分数降低的成年患者死亡率的相关性。
JACC Heart Fail. 2024 May;12(5):936-945. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.01.016. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
7
Inferior vena cava diameter is associated with prognosis in patients with chronic heart failure independent of tricuspid regurgitation velocity.下腔静脉直径与慢性心力衰竭患者的预后相关,与三尖瓣反流速度无关。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2023 Aug;112(8):1077-1086. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02178-4. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
8
Noninvasive assessment of elevated pulmonary vascular resistance in children with pulmonary hypertension secondary to congenital heart disease: A comparative study between five different Doppler indices.先天性心脏病继发肺动脉高压患儿肺血管阻力升高的无创评估:五种不同多普勒指数的比较研究
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2012 Oct;24(4):233-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jsha.2012.05.004. Epub 2012 Jun 4.
9
Echocardiographic predictors of adverse short-term outcomes after heart surgery in patients with mitral regurgitation and pulmonary hypertension.二尖瓣反流和肺动脉高压患者心脏手术后不良短期预后的超声心动图预测指标
Heart Surg Forum. 2012 Jun;15(3):E127-32. doi: 10.1532/HSF98.20121008.
10
Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis: Prognostic Impact After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Pulmonary Hypertension in Patients Undergoing TAVR.严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的肺动脉高压:经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的预后影响:行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的患者的肺动脉高压。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Apr;12(4):591-601. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Pulmonary Hypertension Among Individuals Living With Hemoglobinopathies: A Systematic Review.血红蛋白病患者中的肺动脉高压:一项系统评价。
Cureus. 2025 Jul 18;17(7):e88234. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88234. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Scoring of cardiac damage evaluated by echocardiography predicts prognosis of patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: analysis of the LAPLACE-TAVI registry.经超声心动图评估的心脏损伤评分可预测接受经导管主动脉瓣植入术的严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后:LAPLACE-TAVI注册研究分析
Heart Vessels. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1007/s00380-025-02569-9.
3
Two prospective, multicenter studies for the identification of biomarker signatures for early detection of pulmonary hypertension (PH): The CIPHER and CIPHER-MRI studies.

本文引用的文献

1
Impact of Preoperative Measurement of Right Heart Chambers in the Evaluation of Pulmonary Hypertension Following Aortic Valve Replacement.主动脉瓣置换术后评估肺动脉高压时右心腔术前测量的影响。
Chest. 2020 Jun;157(6):1597-1605. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.12.017. Epub 2020 Jan 17.
2
Morphological Assessment of the Tricuspid Apparatus and Grading Regurgitation Severity in Patients With Functional Tricuspid Regurgitation: Thinking Outside the Box.功能性三尖瓣反流患者三尖瓣瓣叶形态学评估及反流严重程度分级:跳出固有思维。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Apr;12(4):652-664. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.09.029.
3
Morphologic Types of Tricuspid Regurgitation: Characteristics and Prognostic Implications.
两项用于识别肺动脉高压(PH)早期检测生物标志物特征的前瞻性多中心研究:CIPHER研究和CIPHER-MRI研究。
Pulm Circ. 2024 Jun 12;14(2):e12386. doi: 10.1002/pul2.12386. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
S100 proteins in cardiovascular diseases.S100 蛋白与心血管疾病。
Mol Med. 2023 May 22;29(1):68. doi: 10.1186/s10020-023-00662-1.
三尖瓣反流的形态学类型:特征与预后意义。
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019 Mar;12(3):491-499. doi: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2018.09.027.
4
Reference Ranges and Determinants of Tricuspid Regurgitation Velocity in Healthy Adults Assessed by Two-Dimensional Doppler-Echocardiography.二维多谱勒超声心动图评估健康成年人三尖瓣反流速度的参考范围和决定因素。
Respiration. 2018;96(5):425-433. doi: 10.1159/000490191. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
5
Lack of a Tricuspid Regurgitation Doppler Signal and Pulmonary Hypertension by Invasive Measurement.三尖瓣反流多普勒信号缺失与经侵入性测量的肺动脉高压。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Jun 30;7(13):e009362. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009362.
6
Impact of pulmonary hypertension on long-term outcome in patients with severe aortic stenosis.肺动脉高压对严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者长期预后的影响。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018 May 1;19(5):553-561. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jex166.
7
Mild Elevation of Pulmonary Arterial Pressure as a Predictor of Mortality.肺动脉压轻度升高可预测死亡率。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018 Feb 15;197(4):509-516. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201706-1215OC.
8
Prognostic Effect and Longitudinal Hemodynamic Assessment of Borderline Pulmonary Hypertension.边缘性肺动脉高压的预后影响和纵向血流动力学评估。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Dec 1;2(12):1361-1368. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.3882.
9
The right atrium and tricuspid annulus are cardinal structures in tricuspid regurgitation with or without pulmonary hypertension.右心房和三尖瓣环是伴或不伴肺动脉高压的三尖瓣反流中的主要结构。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Mar 1;230:171-174. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.11.075. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
10
Echocardiographic pulmonary hypertension probability is associated with clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.经胸超声心动图评估的肺动脉高压可能性与经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的临床结局相关。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Dec 15;225:218-225. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Oct 6.