• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定义引流胰液收集后使用管腔贴合金属支架以优化结果的医院容量阈值:一项全国性队列研究。

Definition of a hospital volume threshold to optimize outcomes after drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing metal stents: a nationwide cohort study.

机构信息

Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy; Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, The Pancreas Institute, G.B. Rossi University Hospital, Verona, Italy.

Department of Gastroenterology, Valduce Hospital, Como, Italy.

出版信息

Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jun;95(6):1158-1172. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.12.006. Epub 2021 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2021.12.006
PMID:34932991
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is increasing interest in expanding the use of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) in patients with pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). The aim of this study was to determine whether there is a hospital volume threshold for which patient outcomes could be optimized.

METHODS

Data from a large multicenter series of patients with PFCs treated with LAMSs were retrieved. Rate of adverse events (AEs) was the primary outcome. Multivariable models with restricted cubic splines were used to identify a hospital volume threshold by plotting hospital volume against the log odds ratio (OR) of AE rate. Propensity score matching was applied to obtain 2 well-balanced groups according to hospital volume, and univariate/multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify significant predictors of AEs.

RESULTS

Overall, 516 patients were included. Increasing hospital volume was associated with a reduced AE rate (P = .03), and the likelihood of experiencing an AE declined as hospital volume increased up to 15 cases. After propensity score matching, 175 patients in the high-volume (>15 cases) and 132 in the low-volume hospital group were compared. Overall, 41 AEs were observed (13.3%), of which 14 (8%) and 27 (20.4%) occurred at high-volume and low-volume centers, respectively (P = .001). Severe and fatal events were observed more frequently in low-volume centers (6% vs 1.7% and 2.2% vs 0%, respectively; P = .05). In multivariate analysis, main pancreatic duct injury (OR, 2.62; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.26-4.67; P = .02), presence of abnormal vessels (OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.41-5.02; P = .006), and institutional experience (OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.48-5.90; P = .002) were significant predictors of AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

With 15 procedures representing the minimum number of cases associated with the lowest risk for postprocedural AEs, hospital volume is associated with improved outcomes. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT03903523.).

摘要

背景与目的

人们对扩大使用腔内置入式金属支架(LAMS)治疗胰腺液体积聚(PFC)的兴趣日益增加。本研究的目的是确定是否存在一个医院工作量阈值,使患者的预后可以得到优化。

方法

检索了一项大型多中心 LAMS 治疗 PFC 患者系列研究的数据。不良事件(AE)发生率为主要结局。采用限制立方样条的多变量模型,通过绘制医院工作量与 AE 发生率的对数比值(OR)来确定医院工作量阈值。应用倾向评分匹配根据医院工作量获得 2 个均衡良好的组,然后进行单变量/多变量逻辑回归分析,以确定 AE 的显著预测因素。

结果

共有 516 例患者纳入研究。随着医院工作量的增加,AE 发生率降低(P=.03),并且随着医院工作量增加,发生 AE 的可能性降低,最高可达 15 例。在进行倾向评分匹配后,比较了高工作量(>15 例)组的 175 例患者和低工作量医院组的 132 例患者。总体而言,观察到 41 例 AE(13.3%),其中分别有 14 例(8%)和 27 例(20.4%)发生在高工作量和低工作量中心(P=.001)。低工作量中心更常发生严重和致命事件(分别为 6%比 1.7%和 2.2%比 0%;P=.05)。多变量分析显示,主胰管损伤(OR,2.62;95%置信区间[CI],1.26-4.67;P=.02)、存在异常血管(OR,2.93;95%CI,1.41-5.02;P=.006)和机构经验(OR,2.95;95%CI,1.48-5.90;P=.002)是 AE 的显著预测因素。

结论

在 15 例手术中,代表了与术后 AE 风险最低相关的最低例数,医院工作量与改善预后相关。(临床试验注册号:NCT03903523.)

相似文献

1
Definition of a hospital volume threshold to optimize outcomes after drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing metal stents: a nationwide cohort study.定义引流胰液收集后使用管腔贴合金属支架以优化结果的医院容量阈值:一项全国性队列研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Jun;95(6):1158-1172. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.12.006. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
2
Lumen-apposing metal stents with or without coaxial plastic stent placement for the management of pancreatic fluid collections.带或不带同轴塑料支架置入的管腔贴合金属支架用于治疗胰腺液体积聚。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2024 Jan;99(1):104-107. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2023.09.005. Epub 2023 Sep 16.
3
Fully covered self-expanding metal stents versus lumen-apposing fully covered self-expanding metal stent versus plastic stents for endoscopic drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis: clinical outcomes and success.完全覆膜自膨式金属支架与 lumen-apposing 完全覆膜自膨式金属支架与塑料支架用于内镜引流胰腺包裹性坏死:临床结局和成功率。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2017 Apr;85(4):758-765. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2016.08.014. Epub 2016 Aug 24.
4
International multicenter comprehensive analysis of adverse events associated with lumen-apposing metal stent placement for pancreatic fluid collection drainage.国际多中心综合分析与 lumen-apposing 金属支架放置相关的不良事件用于胰腺液收集引流。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2020 Mar;91(3):574-583. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.11.021. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
5
Nomogram for prediction of adverse events after lumen-apposing metal stent placement for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections.用于预测胰腺液体积聚引流后使用 lumen-apposing 金属支架后不良事件的列线图。
Dig Endosc. 2022 Nov;34(7):1459-1470. doi: 10.1111/den.14354. Epub 2022 Jul 20.
6
Predicting the Need for Step-Up Therapy After EUS-Guided Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections With Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents.超声内镜引导下引流胰液收集后使用金属支架预测需要升级治疗。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Oct;19(10):2192-2198. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.05.005. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
7
Safety and efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing covered self-expanding metal stents.内镜超声引导下引流胰腺液体积聚的安全性和有效性:使用 lumen-apposing 覆盖自膨式金属支架。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015 Apr;13(4):747-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.09.047. Epub 2014 Oct 5.
8
Head-to-head comparison between endoscopic ultrasound guided lumen apposing metal stent and plastic stents for the treatment of pancreatic fluid collections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.内镜超声引导下置管引流与塑料支架治疗胰腺液体积聚的头对头比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2022 Feb;29(2):198-211. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.1008. Epub 2021 Jun 28.
9
Lumen Apposing Metal Stents (LAMSs) for Drainage of Pancreatic and Gallbladder Collections: A Meta-analysis.腔内置入金属支架(LAMS)引流胰腺和胆囊积液:荟萃分析。
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Oct;52(9):835-844. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000934.
10
Lumen-apposing metal stents for the treatment of pancreatic and peripancreatic fluid collections and bleeding risk: a propensity matched study.经皮穿刺置管引流联合金属覆膜支架置入术治疗胰腺及胰周积液合并出血风险:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Endoscopy. 2024 Apr;56(4):249-257. doi: 10.1055/a-2219-3179. Epub 2024 Jan 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents in the Management of Complex Pelvic Abscesses.管腔贴壁金属支架在复杂盆腔脓肿治疗中的应用
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 18;14(24):2854. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14242854.
2
Outcomes of lumen apposing metal stent placement in patients with surgically altered anatomy: Multicenter international experience.解剖结构经手术改变患者的管腔贴壁金属支架置入术的疗效:多中心国际经验
Endosc Int Open. 2024 Oct 10;12(10):E1143-E1149. doi: 10.1055/a-2411-1814. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Comorbidity burden and outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of pancreatic fluid collections: Multicenter study with nationwide data-based validation.
胰腺液体积聚的内镜超声引导治疗的共病负担及结局:基于全国数据验证的多中心研究
Dig Endosc. 2025 Apr;37(4):413-425. doi: 10.1111/den.14924. Epub 2024 Sep 26.
4
WONDER-02: plastic stent vs. lumen-apposing metal stent for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts-study protocol for a multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial.WONDER-02:内镜超声引导下引流胰腺假性囊肿的塑料支架与 lumen-apposing 金属支架的比较——一项多中心随机非劣效性试验研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Aug 24;25(1):559. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08373-6.
5
Infected pancreatic necrosis-Current trends in management.感染性胰腺坏死-当前的治疗趋势。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2024 Jun;43(3):578-591. doi: 10.1007/s12664-023-01506-w. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
6
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Gastroenterostomy versus Enteral Stenting for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: A Retrospective Propensity Score-Matched Study.内镜超声引导下胃造口术与肠内支架置入术治疗恶性胃出口梗阻的回顾性倾向评分匹配研究
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Feb 8;16(4):724. doi: 10.3390/cancers16040724.
7
Analysis of adverse events with lumen apposing metal stents for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections.用于胰液积聚引流的管腔贴壁金属支架不良事件分析
Endosc Int Open. 2023 Dec 12;11(12):E1153-E1160. doi: 10.1055/a-2197-3731. eCollection 2023 Dec.
8
Risk factors for adverse outcomes at various phases of endoscopic ultrasound-guided treatment of pancreatic fluid collections: Data from a multi-institutional consortium.内镜超声引导下治疗胰腺液体积聚各阶段不良结局的危险因素:多机构联盟的数据。
Dig Endosc. 2024 May;36(5):600-614. doi: 10.1111/den.14683. Epub 2023 Oct 17.
9
Influence of Frailty in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Biliary Stone Disease: A Nationwide Study.《接受内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗胆石病的患者虚弱状况的影响:一项全国性研究》
Dig Dis Sci. 2023 Sep;68(9):3605-3613. doi: 10.1007/s10620-023-08013-0. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
10
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition beyond the pancreas.内镜超声引导下胰腺以外组织的获取
Ann Gastroenterol. 2023 May-Jun;36(3):257-266. doi: 10.20524/aog.2023.0797. Epub 2023 Apr 8.