新冠疫情之前及期间,老年人情绪低落与社交接触的类型及频率:I-CONECT项目

Type and frequency of social contacts associated with low mood before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in older adults: I-CONECT project.

作者信息

Wu Chao-Yi, Mattek Nora, Fleming Nicole, Scavone Colton, Wild Katherine, Kaye Jeffrey A, Dodge Hiroko H

机构信息

Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Oregon Center for Aging & Technology (ORCATECH), Portland, OR, USA.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement. 2021 Dec;17 Suppl 11(Suppl 11):e052385. doi: 10.1002/alz.052385.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social isolation is a risk factor for dementia, but the underlying mechanism is not well understood. It is possible that lack of social contacts negatively affects emotional well-being, which leads to cognitive decline. To shed light on this potential mediation mechanism, we examined changes in type and frequency of social contacts and their effects on mood using data collected before and during the COVID-19 pandemic among socially isolated older adults aged 75 and older.

METHOD

The data come from an ongoing randomized controlled trial, the Internet-Based Conversational Engagement Clinical Trial (I-CONECT, ClinicalTirals.gov: NCT02871921). One hundred forty-six participants (age=81.0±4.5, 71.9% women) who were in the trial both before and during the pandemic and whose data were available as of November of 2020 were included in the current analysis. Weekly health questionnaires administered on all participants regardless of treatment assignments were collected before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Low mood ("Blueness") was self-reported as feeling downhearted or blue for three or more days in the past week (YES/NO). Social contacts were self-reported by amount of time they had interacted, with whom (family; friends; others), and via which modalities (in-person; phone/video call; text/email).

RESULT

A total of 4,774 weeks of survey data were analyzed (3,047 before COVID 19). The weekly average time spent in-person, on phone/video call, and via text/email were 282, 113, and 44 minutes, respectively. During the COVID-19 pandemic, participants on average spent 82 minutes less in total social contact per week (in-person: reduced 123 minutes, video/call: increased 28 minutes, text/email: increased 13 minutes per week). Generalized estimating equation model revealed that in-person family contact was associated with less blueness regardless of the pandemic (OR=0.91, p=0.04). There was a COVID*text/email time with friends interaction (OR=0.68, p=0.03), suggesting that during the COVID-19 pandemic, an increase of 1 hour of texting/emailing with friends per week was associated with 32% decrease in experiencing blueness three or more days per week.

CONCLUSION

In-person family time is beneficial for mental health. While in-person contacts become less frequent during the COVID-19 pandemic, increased text/email time with friends becomes an alternative to maintain mental health for socially isolated older adults.

摘要

背景

社交隔离是痴呆症的一个风险因素,但其潜在机制尚未完全明确。缺乏社交联系可能会对情绪健康产生负面影响,进而导致认知能力下降。为了阐明这一潜在的中介机制,我们利用在新冠疫情之前及疫情期间收集的75岁及以上社会隔离老年人的数据,研究了社交联系的类型和频率变化及其对情绪的影响。

方法

数据来自一项正在进行的随机对照试验——基于互联网的对话参与临床试验(I-CONECT,ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02871921)。纳入本次分析的是146名参与者(年龄=81.0±4.5岁,71.9%为女性),他们在疫情之前和期间均参与了该试验,且截至2020年11月其数据可用。在新冠疫情之前和期间,收集了所有参与者(无论治疗分配情况如何)每周的健康问卷。情绪低落(“忧郁”)通过自我报告,即过去一周内感到沮丧或忧郁达三天或以上(是/否)。社交联系通过自我报告他们互动的时间、对象(家人;朋友;其他人)以及方式(面对面;电话/视频通话;短信/电子邮件)来确定。

结果

共分析了4774周的调查数据(新冠疫情之前为3047周)。每周平均面对面交流时间、电话/视频通话时间和通过短信/电子邮件交流的时间分别为282分钟、113分钟和44分钟。在新冠疫情期间,参与者每周总的社交接触平均减少82分钟(面对面:减少123分钟,视频/通话:增加28分钟,短信/电子邮件:每周增加13分钟)。广义估计方程模型显示,无论疫情情况如何,与家人的面对面接触都与较少的忧郁情绪相关(OR=0.91,p=0.04)。存在新冠疫情*与朋友短信/电子邮件交流时间的交互作用(OR=0.68,p=0.03),这表明在新冠疫情期间,每周与朋友发短信/电子邮件交流时间增加1小时与每周出现三天或以上忧郁情绪的几率降低32%相关。

结论

与家人的面对面相处时间对心理健康有益。在新冠疫情期间,虽然面对面接触变得不那么频繁,但增加与朋友的短信/电子邮件交流时间成为社会隔离老年人维持心理健康的一种替代方式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索