对顶叶伸展区运动准备的对侧肢体特异性。
Contralateral Limb Specificity for Movement Preparation in the Parietal Reach Region.
机构信息
Department of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110
Department of Cognitive Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California 92093.
出版信息
J Neurosci. 2022 Mar 2;42(9):1692-1701. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0232-21.2021. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
The canonical view of motor control is that distal musculature is controlled primarily by the contralateral cerebral hemisphere; unilateral brain lesions typically affect contralateral but not ipsilateral musculature. Contralateral-only limb deficits following a unilateral lesion suggest but do not prove that control is strictly contralateral: the loss of a contribution of the lesioned hemisphere to the control of the ipsilesional limb could be masked by the intact contralateral drive from the nonlesioned hemisphere. To distinguish between these possibilities, we serially inactivated the parietal reach region, comprising the posterior portion of medial intraparietal area, the anterior portion of V6a, and portions of the lateral occipital parietal area, in each hemisphere of 2 monkeys (23 experimental sessions, 46 injections total) to evaluate parietal reach region's contribution to the contralateral reaching deficits observed following lateralized brain lesions. Following unilateral inactivation, reach reaction times with the contralesional limb were slowed compared with matched blocks of control behavioral data; there was no effect of unilateral inactivation on the reaction time of either ipsilesional limb reaches or saccadic eye movements. Following bilateral inactivation, reaching was slowed in both limbs, with an effect size in each no different from that produced by unilateral inactivation. These findings indicate contralateral organization of reach preparation in posterior parietal cortex. Unilateral brain lesions typically affect contralateral but not ipsilateral musculature. Contralateral-only limb deficits following a unilateral lesion suggest but do not prove that control is strictly contralateral: the loss of a contribution of the lesioned hemisphere to the control of the ipsilesional limb could be masked by the intact contralateral drive from the nonlesioned hemisphere. Unilateral lesions cannot distinguish between contralateral and bilateral control, but bilateral lesions can. Here we show similar movement initiation deficits after combined unilateral and bilateral inactivation of the parietal reach region, indicating contralateral organization of reach preparation.
运动控制的规范观点认为,远隔肌肉主要由对侧大脑半球控制;单侧脑损伤通常会影响对侧肌肉,但不会影响同侧肌肉。单侧损伤后仅出现对侧肢体缺陷表明但不能证明控制是严格对侧的:损伤半球对同侧肢体控制的贡献丧失可能被未损伤半球的完整对侧驱动所掩盖。为了区分这些可能性,我们在 2 只猴子的每只半球中(23 个实验疗程,总共 46 次注射)连续失活顶叶到达区域,该区域包括内侧顶内区的后部分、V6a 的前部分和外侧枕顶区的部分,以评估顶叶到达区域对侧偏侧脑损伤后观察到的对侧到达缺陷的贡献。单侧失活后,与匹配的对照行为数据相比,对侧肢体的到达反应时间减慢;单侧失活对同侧肢体的到达反应时间或扫视眼运动没有影响。双侧失活后,双侧肢体的运动速度均减慢,每个侧的效应大小与单侧失活产生的效应大小无差异。这些发现表明,顶叶后皮质中的到达准备是对侧组织的。单侧脑损伤通常会影响对侧肌肉,但不会影响同侧肌肉。单侧损伤后仅出现对侧肢体缺陷表明但不能证明控制是严格对侧的:损伤半球对同侧肢体控制的贡献丧失可能被未损伤半球的完整对侧驱动所掩盖。单侧损伤不能区分对侧和双侧控制,但双侧损伤可以。在这里,我们在顶叶到达区域的单侧和双侧失活后显示出类似的运动起始缺陷,表明到达准备的对侧组织。