• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Protocol for a systematic review of the in vivo studies on radiofrequency (100 kHz-300 GHz) electromagnetic field exposure and cancer.射频(100kHz-300GHz)电磁场暴露与癌症的体内研究系统评价议定书。
Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 16;11(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01898-4.
2
Genotoxicity of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: Protocol for a systematic review of in vitro studies.射频电磁场的遗传毒性:体外研究系统评价议定书。
Environ Int. 2021 Mar;148:106386. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106386. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
3
Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure on male fertility: A systematic review of experimental studies on non-human mammals and human sperm in vitro.射频电磁场(RF-EMF)暴露对男性生育力的影响:非人类哺乳动物和体外人类精子实验研究的系统评价。
Environ Int. 2024 Mar;185:108509. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108509. Epub 2024 Feb 19.
4
Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (RF EMF) on cancer in laboratory animal studies.射频电磁场(RF EMF)对实验室动物癌症的影响。
Environ Int. 2022 Mar;161:107106. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107106. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
5
Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field (RF-EMF) exposure on male fertility and pregnancy and birth outcomes: Protocols for a systematic review of experimental studies in non-human mammals and in human sperm exposed in vitro.射频电磁场(RF-EMF)暴露对男性生育力和妊娠及出生结局的影响:在非人类哺乳动物和体外暴露的人类精子中进行实验研究的系统评价方案。
Environ Int. 2021 Dec;157:106806. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106806. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
6
The effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields exposure on tinnitus, migraine and non-specific symptoms in the general and working population: A protocol for a systematic review on human observational studies.射频电磁场暴露对一般人群和职业人群中耳鸣、偏头痛和非特异性症状的影响:一项关于人类观察性研究的系统评价方案。
Environ Int. 2021 Dec;157:106852. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106852. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
7
The effect of exposure to radiofrequency fields on cancer risk in the general and working population: A systematic review of human observational studies - Part I: Most researched outcomes.射频场暴露对一般人群和职业人群癌症风险的影响:人类观察性研究的系统评价 - 第 I 部分:研究最多的结果。
Environ Int. 2024 Sep;191:108983. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108983. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
8
Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Field (RF-EMF) exposure on pregnancy and birth outcomes: A systematic review of experimental studies on non-human mammals.射频电磁场 (RF-EMF) 暴露对妊娠和出生结局的影响:对非人类哺乳动物的实验研究的系统评价。
Environ Int. 2023 Oct;180:108178. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2023.108178. Epub 2023 Aug 30.
9
The effects of radiofrequency exposure on male fertility: A systematic review of human observational studies with dose-response meta-analysis.射频辐射对男性生育力的影响:一项基于人类观察性研究的系统评价和剂量-反应荟萃分析。
Environ Int. 2024 Aug;190:108817. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.108817. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
10
The effect of exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields on cognitive performance in human experimental studies: A protocol for a systematic review.射频电磁场暴露对人类实验研究中认知表现的影响:系统评价方案。
Environ Int. 2021 Dec;157:106783. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106783. Epub 2021 Jul 29.

引用本文的文献

1
A Systematic Review on the In Vivo Studies on Radiofrequency (100 kHz-300 GHz) Electromagnetic Field Exposure and Co-Carcinogenesis.射频(100 kHz-300 GHz)电磁场暴露与协同致癌作用的体内研究系统性综述
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Aug 2;21(8):1020. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21081020.
2
In Vivo Studies on Radiofrequency (100 kHz-300 GHz) Electromagnetic Field Exposure and Cancer: A Systematic Review.体内射频(100 kHz-300 GHz)电磁场暴露与癌症的研究:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 23;20(3):2071. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032071.

本文引用的文献

1
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
2
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
3
Meta-analyses of animal studies: an introduction of a valuable instrument to further improve healthcare.动物研究的荟萃分析:进一步改善医疗保健的宝贵工具介绍
ILAR J. 2014;55(3):418-26. doi: 10.1093/ilar/ilu042.
4
The Navigation Guide - evidence-based medicine meets environmental health: systematic review of nonhuman evidence for PFOA effects on fetal growth.《导航指南——循证医学与环境卫生:全氟辛酸对胎儿生长影响的非人类证据系统评价》
Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Oct;122(10):1015-27. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307177. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
5
The Navigation Guide systematic review methodology: a rigorous and transparent method for translating environmental health science into better health outcomes.《导航指南》系统评价方法:一种将环境卫生科学转化为更好健康结果的严谨且透明的方法。
Environ Health Perspect. 2014 Oct;122(10):1007-14. doi: 10.1289/ehp.1307175. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
6
Non-ionizing radiation, Part 2: Radiofrequency electromagnetic fields.非电离辐射,第2部分:射频电磁场。
IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2013;102(Pt 2):1-460.
7
SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies.SYRCLE 动物研究偏倚风险评估工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014 Mar 26;14:43. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-14-43.
8
Flaws in animal studies exploring statins and impact on meta-analysis.他汀类药物动物研究的缺陷及其对荟萃分析的影响。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2014 Jun;44(6):597-612. doi: 10.1111/eci.12264. Epub 2014 May 6.
9
Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: a practical guide.动物研究数据的荟萃分析:实用指南。
J Neurosci Methods. 2014 Jan 15;221:92-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
10
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence.GRADE 指南:3. 评估证据质量。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015. Epub 2011 Jan 5.

射频(100kHz-300GHz)电磁场暴露与癌症的体内研究系统评价议定书。

Protocol for a systematic review of the in vivo studies on radiofrequency (100 kHz-300 GHz) electromagnetic field exposure and cancer.

机构信息

Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development - ENEA, Division of Health Protection Technologies, CR ENEA Casaccia- via Anguillarese 301, 00123, Santa Maria di Galeria, RM, Italy.

出版信息

Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 16;11(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13643-022-01898-4.

DOI:10.1186/s13643-022-01898-4
PMID:35172887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8848792/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An Italian project aims to review the scientific literature on the possible carcinogenicity of radiofrequency (100 kHz-300 GHz) electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure. The ENEA team has to carry out a systematic review of the in vivo studies on this topic.

OBJECTIVES

Development of a protocol for a systematic review (meta-analysis included) to investigate the potential carcinogenic risk following RF-EMF in vivo exposure to doses above or within legal limits. The aims of this review are (1) to provide a descriptive and, if possible, a quantitative summary of the results of the examined RF-EMF in vivo studies, together with an assessment of the consistency of observations and of the causes of heterogeneity, and (2) to assess the weight of evidence to support or refute the hypothesis of carcinogenic effects caused by RF-EMF exposure and to draw conclusions about the potential for carcinogenicity of RF-EMF exposure.

METHODS

We will search for relevant studies in electronic academic databases and in the reference list of selected papers and reviews on the topic, including the descriptive reviews on RF-EMF carcinogenic effect carried out by international panels of experts since 2011. The following elements of the PECO question were defined: experimental studies on rodents of both sexes, all ages and species, all genetic backgrounds (Population) exposed to RF-EMF alone, or in combination with other physical or chemical agents (Exposure); only studies reporting outcome data in exposed and sham control groups (Comparison); and all types of cancer with all tumor-related outcome measures (Outcome) will be included. Only peer-reviewed articles written in English will be considered without limit in the publication date. Eligibility criteria were defined for papers to be included. A risk of bias assessment will be performed using a tool specifically developed for animal studies. A meta-analysis will be performed, if feasible, for all outcome measures; for subgroup analysis, a minimum of 3 studies per subgroup will be required. If meta-analysis will not be possible, a narrative synthesis of the results will be reported.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42020191105 HIGHLIGHTS: An Italian collaborative research agreement aims to review the scientific literature on the possible carcinogenicity of RF-EMF (100 kHz - 300 GHz). The ENEA team will systematically review and, if possible, meta-analyse estimates the effects of in vivo exposure to RF-EMF exposure on cancer. The ENEA group is a multidisciplinary team of researchers with a consolidated experience both in carcinogenicity experiments and radiofrequency dosimetric assessment. The proposed protocol uses the NTP OHAT Approach for Systematic Review as an organizing framework. The proposed protocol aims to lead to the first systematic review providing a strength of evidence assessment on this topic.

摘要

背景

一个意大利项目旨在审查关于射频(100kHz-300GHz)电磁场(RF-EMF)暴露可能致癌性的科学文献。ENEA 团队必须对该主题的体内研究进行系统评价。

目的

制定一项系统评价的方案(包括荟萃分析),以调查在高于或低于法定限制的剂量下,体内暴露于 RF-EMF 后潜在的致癌风险。本次审查的目的是:(1)提供对已检查的 RF-EMF 体内研究结果的描述性和(如果可能的话)定量总结,并评估观察结果的一致性和异质性的原因;(2)评估支持或反驳 RF-EMF 暴露致癌效应假说的证据权重,并就 RF-EMF 暴露的致癌潜力得出结论。

方法

我们将在电子学术数据库和选定论文和综述的参考文献中搜索相关研究,包括自 2011 年以来国际专家组就 RF-EMF 致癌效应进行的描述性综述。已定义了以下 PECO 问题的要素:对所有年龄和物种的雄性和雌性啮齿动物进行的实验研究(人群)单独或与其他物理或化学剂联合暴露于 RF-EMF(暴露);仅报告暴露组和假手术对照组中结果数据的研究(比较);以及所有类型的癌症和所有与肿瘤相关的结果测量(结局)都将被包括在内。仅考虑同行评审的英文文章,出版日期不受限制。已定义了纳入论文的标准。将使用专门为动物研究开发的工具进行偏倚风险评估。如果可行,将对所有结局指标进行荟萃分析;对于亚组分析,每个亚组至少需要 3 项研究。如果无法进行荟萃分析,将报告结果的叙述性综合。

系统评价注册

PROSPERO CRD42020191105 重点:意大利合作研究协议旨在审查关于射频电磁辐射(100kHz-300GHz)致癌可能性的科学文献。ENEA 团队将系统地审查并尽可能地对体内暴露于射频电磁辐射对癌症的影响进行荟萃分析。ENEA 小组是一个多学科的研究人员团队,在致癌性实验和射频剂量评估方面具有丰富的经验。所提出的方案使用 NTP OHAT 方法作为系统评价的组织框架。该方案旨在对这一主题进行首次系统评价,并提供证据强度评估。