医学博士生对期刊俱乐部研讨会的看法:五年评估结果。

Perception of journal club seminars by medical doctoral students: results from five years of evaluation.

机构信息

Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Department of General, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

GMS J Med Educ. 2022 Feb 15;39(1):Doc4. doi: 10.3205/zma001525. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

A journal club is one of the well-established and popular methods of post-graduate education. In this work, we were interested to understand how the participants perceive journal club as a whole and how they evaluate their personal process of acquiring new scientific knowledge and development of soft-skills as an indispensable prerequisite of the lifelong learning. This study is a survey analysis examining perception of journal club sessions by post-graduate medical students. A checklist for journal club preparation as well as a questionnaire for evaluation of the journal club session by participants has been developed to determine if the journal club had met its aims. Data were collected by summing up all answers to each question of the questionnaire for each session. Qualitative data from a five-year evaluation period were compiled and analyzed. The journal club checklist served as a guideline for the preparation of a journal club session as well as an evaluation questionnaire containing 24 items. Our work presents evidence that journal club seminars are well perceived by participants. Furthermore, a high percentage of participants deemed the working atmosphere to be constructive and found it worthwhile to participate in the sessions. The topics of the presentations have been positively evaluated, however only a minority of participants found that the topics of the journal club was related to their own specific research topic. Concerning the distribution of the journal article, we could show that distributing the paper one week before the journal club event provided sufficient time for preparation. Our evaluation revealed that two-thirds of the participants found discussions during journal club sessions rich and productive. The motivation to think more critically increased during journal club sessions. From our work, it is evident that the participants perceived the speakers´ soft-skills to have improved with the practice. Finally, we show a clear trend of improved perception of the value of journal club sessions from beginning to the end of the evaluation time. Based on the analyzed evaluations, we can conclude that journal club events are highly valued by participants and could be a good option for the development of certain soft-skills.

摘要

期刊俱乐部是研究生教育中一种成熟且流行的方法。在这项工作中,我们有兴趣了解参与者如何整体看待期刊俱乐部,以及他们如何评估自己获取新知识和发展软技能的个人过程,因为这是终身学习的不可或缺的前提。 这项研究是对研究生医学生对期刊俱乐部课程的看法进行的调查分析。制定了期刊俱乐部准备检查表和参与者对期刊俱乐部课程的评估问卷,以确定期刊俱乐部是否达到了其目标。通过对每个课程的每个问题的所有答案进行汇总来收集数据。从五年的评估期收集定性数据并进行分析。 期刊俱乐部检查表作为期刊俱乐部会议准备的指南,以及包含 24 个项目的评估问卷。我们的工作表明,期刊俱乐部研讨会受到参与者的好评。此外,绝大多数参与者认为工作氛围具有建设性,并且认为参加会议是值得的。演讲的主题得到了积极评价,但是只有少数参与者认为期刊俱乐部的主题与他们自己的特定研究主题有关。关于期刊文章的分配,我们可以表明,在期刊俱乐部活动前一周分发论文为准备提供了足够的时间。我们的评估结果表明,三分之二的参与者认为期刊俱乐部会议期间的讨论内容丰富且富有成效。在期刊俱乐部会议期间,批判性思维的动机增加了。从我们的工作中可以明显看出,参与者认为演讲者的软技能随着实践而得到了提高。最后,我们显示出对期刊俱乐部课程价值的看法从评估开始到结束呈明显上升趋势。 基于分析评估,我们可以得出结论,期刊俱乐部活动受到参与者的高度重视,并且可能是发展某些软技能的不错选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7750/8953192/cea3df5d9747/JME-39-4-t-001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索