验证一款针对疾病管理的移动应用程序评分量表（MARS）的韩文版本。

Validation of a Korean version of mobile app rating scale (MARS) for apps targeting disease management.

机构信息

217065School of Architecture, Design and Planning, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Department of Nursing, and Department of Biomedicine, 34991Health & Life Convergence Sciences, BK21 Four, Biomedical and Healthcare Research Institute, Mokpo National University, Jeonnam, Korea.

出版信息

Health Informatics J. 2022 Jan-Mar;28(0):14604582221091975. doi: 10.1177/14604582221091975.

DOI:10.1177/14604582221091975

PMID:35404685

Abstract

The mobile app rating scale (MARS) is a widely used instrument for evaluating smartphone app quality. We aimed to examine the reliability and validity of the Korean version of MARS (MARS-K). Two independent raters performed the assessment using the translated 23-item questionnaire. We applied intraclass correlation coefficient analysis (ICC) to examine inter-rater reliability, Omega, and item-total correlation for internal consistency, and Pearson's r for test-retest reliability and correlation between subscales and the total score of MARS-K. Most items showed moderate to good ICC (0.447-1.000). The MARS-K showed excellent internal consistency and all subscales exceeded the acceptable level of omega. Results indicated MARS-K to be a valid and reliable instrument for evaluating disease management apps offered in the Korean app store. However, upgrades are recommended to further improve MARS-K's rating accuracy and reliability.

摘要

移动应用程序评级量表（MARS）是一种广泛用于评估智能手机应用程序质量的工具。我们旨在检验 MARS 韩文版（MARS-K）的可靠性和有效性。两名独立的评估者使用翻译后的 23 项问卷进行评估。我们应用组内相关系数分析（ICC）来检验评分者间的可靠性、内部一致性的 Omega 值和条目-总分相关性，以及测试-重测信度和 MARS-K 的子量表与总分之间的 Pearson r 值。大多数条目显示出中度到高度的 ICC（0.447-1.000）。MARS-K 具有极好的内部一致性，所有子量表均超过了 Omega 值的可接受水平。结果表明，MARS-K 是一种评估韩国应用商店中提供的疾病管理应用程序的有效且可靠的工具。然而，建议进行升级以进一步提高 MARS-K 的评分准确性和可靠性。