Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Department of Dermatology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022 Nov;36(11):2087-2100. doi: 10.1111/jdv.18376. Epub 2022 Jul 29.
Clinical trials study treatment outcomes under stringent conditions, capturing incompletely the heterogeneity of patient populations and treatment complexities encountered in real-world practice.
To compare the effectiveness of anti-interleukin (IL)-17A biologics relative to other approved biologics in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.
The Psoriasis Study of Health Outcomes (PSoHO) is an ongoing 3-year observational cohort study in adults with chronic moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis initiating or switching to a new biologic. Primary study endpoint is the proportion of patients achieving 90% improvement in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI 90) and/or static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) 0/1 at Week 12 (W12) in the anti-IL-17A cohort (ixekizumab [IXE], secukinumab) vs. all other approved biologics. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of patients who achieve PASI 75/90/100, absolute PASI scores ≤5, ≤2 and ≤1, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score of 0/1 at W12 between the two cohorts and among the individual biologics. Comparative effectiveness analyses were conducted using Frequentist Model Averaging (FMA), a novel causal inference machine learning approach. Missing data for binary outcomes were imputed as non-response.
Patient profiles in the anti-IL-17A cohort and other biologics cohort were similar, with more frequent comorbid psoriatic arthritis and less frequent exposure to conventional treatments in the patients receiving anti-IL-17A biologics. At W12, 71.4% of patients who received an anti-IL-17A biologic achieved PASI 90 and/or sPGA 0/1 compared to 58.6% of patients who received other biologics (odds ratios [OR], 1.9; 95% confidence intervals [CI], [1.6, 2.4]). Similar findings were observed for secondary outcomes.
These results reflect the high efficacy and early onset of skin clearance of IL-17A inhibitors observed in randomized clinical trials and confirm the effectiveness of anti-IL-17A biologics in the real-world setting.
临床试验在严格的条件下研究治疗结果,未能完全捕捉到真实世界实践中患者人群和治疗复杂性的异质性。
比较抗白细胞介素 (IL)-17A 生物制剂相对于其他已批准生物制剂在中重度银屑病患者中的疗效。
银屑病健康结局研究 (PSoHO) 是一项正在进行的为期 3 年的观察性队列研究,纳入了开始使用或转换为新生物制剂的慢性中重度斑块状银屑病成人患者。主要研究终点是抗 IL-17A 队列(依奇珠单抗 [IXE]、司库奇尤单抗)与所有其他已批准生物制剂相比,第 12 周(W12)时达到银屑病面积和严重程度指数(PASI)90%改善和/或静态医师总体评估(sPGA)0/1的患者比例,次要结局包括两个队列和各个生物制剂中达到 PASI 75/90/100、绝对 PASI 评分≤5、≤2 和≤1、皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)评分 0/1的患者比例。使用 Frequentist Model Averaging(FMA),一种新的因果推理机器学习方法进行了比较有效性分析。对于二分类结局的缺失数据,作为无应答进行了插补。
抗 IL-17A 队列和其他生物制剂队列的患者特征相似,接受抗 IL-17A 生物制剂的患者中更常见共患银屑病关节炎,而接受传统治疗的患者较少。在 W12 时,接受抗 IL-17A 生物制剂的患者中 71.4%达到 PASI 90 和/或 sPGA 0/1,而接受其他生物制剂的患者中为 58.6%(优势比 [OR],1.9;95%置信区间 [CI],[1.6, 2.4])。次要结局也观察到类似的结果。
这些结果反映了随机临床试验中观察到的 IL-17A 抑制剂的高疗效和早期皮肤清除作用,并证实了抗 IL-17A 生物制剂在真实环境中的有效性。