• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

EORTC QLQ-BR45 在埃塞俄比亚乳腺癌患者中的翻译和验证。

Translation and validation of the EORTC QLQ-BR45 among Ethiopian breast cancer patients.

机构信息

The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450052, Henan, China.

School of Nursing and Health, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, Henan, China.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 29;12(1):605. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02511-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-021-02511-9
PMID:35906247
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9338022/
Abstract

This study aimed to examine the validity and reliability of the EORTC QLQ-BR45 questionnaire among breast cancer patients in Ethiopia. This study included 248 breast cancer patients who completed the QLQ-BR45 and QLQ-C30 questionnaires. The internal reliability, test-retest reliability, and the content, concurrent, convergent, divergent, and clinical validity of the tool were examined. The statistical analyses included Cronbach's α coefficient, Pearson's correlation coefficient, standardised root mean square residual (SRMR), comparative fit index (CFI), t-test, and root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA). All items were marked as relevant, and item-level content validity index (I-CVI) scores ranged from 0.83 to 1. The S-CVI/Ave was calculated by dividing the sum of I-CVI values by the total number of items, which was found to be 0.94. The average CVR value was 0.76. The Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.80 for all domains. All subscales met the minimal standards of reliability except the arm symptom scale (0.66). The test-retest reliability coefficient was 0.77 for all domains. Seven out of the 12 hypothesised scales showed positive correlations (r > 0.40) between the QLQ-BR45 and QLQ-C30 scales. Multitrait scaling analysis showed that the item-scale correlations exceeded the 0.40 criterion for item-convergent validity for 11 of the 12 hypothesised scales. The correlation coefficients between an item and its own subscale were significantly higher than with other subscales. The EORTC QLQ-BR45 had good reliability and validity, and it can be used to measure the quality of life of breast cancer patients in Ethiopia.

摘要

本研究旨在检验 EORTC QLQ-BR45 问卷在埃塞俄比亚乳腺癌患者中的有效性和可靠性。本研究纳入了 248 例乳腺癌患者,他们完成了 QLQ-BR45 和 QLQ-C30 问卷。研究考察了工具的内部信度、重测信度以及内容、同时、收敛、发散和临床有效性。统计分析包括 Cronbach's α 系数、Pearson 相关系数、标准化根均方残差(SRMR)、比较拟合指数(CFI)、t 检验和近似均方根误差(RMSEA)。所有项目均被标记为相关,项目水平内容有效性指数(I-CVI)得分范围为 0.83 至 1。S-CVI/Ave 通过将 I-CVI 值总和除以总项目数计算得出,结果为 0.94。平均 CVR 值为 0.76。所有领域的 Cronbach's α 系数均为 0.80。除手臂症状量表(0.66)外,所有子量表均符合最低可靠性标准。所有领域的重测信度系数均为 0.77。12 个假设量表中有 7 个在 QLQ-BR45 和 QLQ-C30 量表之间显示出正相关(r>0.40)。多特质标度分析显示,12 个假设量表中有 11 个的项目-量表相关性超过了 0.40 的项目收敛有效性标准。项目与其自身子量表之间的相关系数明显高于与其他子量表之间的相关系数。EORTC QLQ-BR45 具有良好的信度和有效性,可用于衡量埃塞俄比亚乳腺癌患者的生活质量。