AZD1656用于COVID-19住院糖尿病患者的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心临床试验:阿卡迪亚试验——对治疗性免疫调节的启示

A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre clinical trial of AZD1656 in diabetic patients hospitalised with COVID-19: The ARCADIA Trial - implications for therapeutic immune modulation.

作者信息

Chorlton Jamie, Hollowood Zoe, Dyer Carlene, Lockhart Donna, Boekman Pascal, McCafferty Kieran, Coffey Pete, Marelli-Berg Federica, Martin John

机构信息

St George Street Capital, (UK Registered charity No: 1171470), London, UK.

William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

EClinicalMedicine. 2022 Sep;51:101604. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101604. Epub 2022 Aug 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A potential immunotherapeutic role for AZD1656 (a glucokinase activator) in the treatment of COVID-19 was hypothesized. The ARCADIA trial investigated the safety and efficacy of AZD1656 in diabetic patients admitted to hospital with COVID-19.

METHODS

The ARCADIA trial was a Phase II randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Adult diabetic patients, admitted with COVID-19, were recruited at 28 hospitals in the UK, Romania and Czech Republic and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive AZD1656 tablets (100mg twice a day), or matched placebo, for up to 21 days, in addition to usual care. All involved were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was clinical improvement measured at Day 14. The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all patients who received at least one dose of assigned treatment. ARCADIA is complete and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04516759).

FINDINGS

Between 29 September 2020 to 16 April 2021, 170 patients were screened and 156 patients were randomised, three of whom did not commence treatment. Of the remaining 153, 80 were assigned to AZD1656 and 73 were assigned to placebo and included in the Full Analysis Set (FAS). The primary analysis showed no statistically significant difference between groups (AZD1656: 76·3%; Placebo: 69·9%, 0·19). There was no difference in the number of adverse events between groups (AZD1656: 35·7%; Placebo: 33·3%). Mortality was lower in the AZD1656 group compared to the placebo group (AZD1656: four (5%); Placebo: nine (12·3%), 0·090)). At Day 7 there were zero deaths in the AZD1656 group compared to six deaths in the placebo group (0·011, post hoc). A difference between groups in time to hospital discharge was also seen (0·16). Immunophenotyping data suggested that AZD1656-treated patients had a less pro-inflammatory immune response and a better adaptive immune response than those treated with placebo.

INTERPRETATION

Although the trial did not achieve its primary endpoint, AZD1656 was associated with a decrease in deaths and a reduction in the duration of hospitalisation, as compared to Placebo. Immunophenotyping and immunochemistry indicated an immunomodulatory effect of AZD1656. The trial suggests a beneficial therapeutic effect of AZD1656 and identifies a new therapeutic concept: small molecule activation of endogenous homeostatic immune cells which themselves become the therapeutic agent within the body. Phase 2 trials of this size carry the risk of false positive results and confirmation of these results in a larger clinical trial is now required.

FUNDING

UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) 'Innovate UK' programme and Excalibur Medicines Ltd.

摘要

背景

有人提出AZD1656(一种葡萄糖激酶激活剂)在治疗2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)中可能具有免疫治疗作用。ARCADIA试验研究了AZD1656对因COVID-19住院的糖尿病患者的安全性和疗效。

方法

ARCADIA试验是一项II期随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验。因COVID-19住院的成年糖尿病患者在英国、罗马尼亚和捷克共和国的28家医院招募,并随机分配(1:1)接受AZD1656片剂(每日两次,每次100mg)或匹配的安慰剂,最长21天,同时接受常规治疗。所有参与人员均对治疗分配不知情。主要终点是在第14天测量的临床改善情况。全分析集(FAS)包括所有接受至少一剂指定治疗的患者。ARCADIA试验已完成,并在ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT04516759)上注册。

研究结果

在2020年9月29日至2021年4月16日期间,170名患者接受筛查,156名患者被随机分组,其中3人未开始治疗。在其余153人中,80人被分配接受AZD1656治疗,73人被分配接受安慰剂治疗,并纳入全分析集(FAS)。初步分析显示两组之间无统计学显著差异(AZD1656组:76.3%;安慰剂组:69.9%,P = 0.19)。两组之间不良事件数量无差异(AZD1656组:35.7%;安慰剂组:33.3%)。与安慰剂组相比,AZD1656组的死亡率更低(AZD1656组:4例(5%);安慰剂组:9例(12.3%),P = 0.090)。在第7天,AZD1656组无死亡病例,而安慰剂组有6例死亡(P = 0.011,事后分析)。两组之间出院时间也存在差异(P = 0.16)。免疫表型分析数据表明,与接受安慰剂治疗的患者相比,接受AZD1656治疗的患者促炎免疫反应较弱,适应性免疫反应较好。

解读

尽管该试验未达到其主要终点,但与安慰剂相比,AZD1656与死亡人数减少和住院时间缩短相关。免疫表型分析和免疫化学表明AZD1656具有免疫调节作用。该试验表明AZD1656具有有益的治疗效果,并确定了一个新的治疗概念:小分子激活内源性稳态免疫细胞,这些细胞本身成为体内的治疗剂。这种规模的II期试验存在假阳性结果的风险,现在需要在更大规模的临床试验中证实这些结果。

资助

英国研究与创新署(UKRI)的“英国创新”计划和Excalibur Medicines有限公司。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/290f/9513546/394d67c95b3e/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索