Suppr超能文献

新开发的便携式腹部阻抗分析仪Y-scope评估腹部内脏脂肪面积的准确性。

Accuracy of Y-scope, a newly developed portable abdominal impedance analyzer, for the assessment of abdominal visceral fat area.

作者信息

Yoon Ji Won, Sohn Minji, Moon Ji Hye, Lim Soo

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.

出版信息

Front Nutr. 2022 Oct 12;9:950747. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.950747. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

AIM

This study was conducted to evaluate the accuracy of a newly developed multifrequency segmental (MFS) bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) method using an additional portable abdominal (PA) impedance analyzer, in the assessment of abdominal visceral fat area (VFA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred healthy Korean subjects aged 19 years or over (43 men and 57 women) were recruited, and VFA was estimated by a conventional MFS-BIA machine and a new MFS-BIA machine with a PA-BIA device, indicating MFS-VFA and MFS&PA-VFA, respectively. The accuracy of the VFA values was compared with those evaluated with CT at the level of the umbilicus (CT-VFA).

RESULTS

The mean age was 41 years and mean body mass index (BMI) was 24.4 kg/m. The mean ± SD VFAs measured by CT, conventional MFS-BIA, and new MFS&PA-BIA together were 93.4 ± 60.9, 92.7 ± 53.4, and 93.6 ± 55.4 cm, respectively. Correlation coefficients comparing CT-VFA with MFS-VFA and MFS&PA-VFA were 0.612 and 0.932, respectively ( < 0.001 for both). The mean difference between CT-VFA and MFS&PA-VFA was less affected by age, sex, and BMI compared with that between CT-VFA and MFS-VFA. Intraclass correlation coefficient (95% CI) between CT-VFA and MFS&PA-VFA was also greater than that between CT-VFA and MFS-VFA, 0.96 (0.95-0.98) vs. 0.76 (0.64-0.84), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this study, application of a newly developed MFS-BIA machine combined with a PA-BIA device significantly improved the correlation with CT-measured VFA without proportional error. This novel approach using advanced technology may be able to provide more reliable estimates of abdominal VFA.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估一种新开发的多频节段性(MFS)生物电阻抗分析(BIA)方法(使用额外的便携式腹部(PA)阻抗分析仪)在评估腹部内脏脂肪面积(VFA)方面的准确性。

材料与方法

招募了100名19岁及以上的健康韩国受试者(43名男性和57名女性),通过传统的MFS-BIA机器和配备PA-BIA设备的新型MFS-BIA机器分别估算VFA,分别表示为MFS-VFA和MFS&PA-VFA。将VFA值的准确性与在脐水平通过CT评估的值(CT-VFA)进行比较。

结果

平均年龄为41岁,平均体重指数(BMI)为24.4kg/m。CT、传统MFS-BIA和新型MFS&PA-BIA共同测量的平均±标准差VFA分别为93.4±60.9、92.7±53.4和93.6±55.4cm²。比较CT-VFA与MFS-VFA和MFS&PA-VFA的相关系数分别为0.612和0.932(两者均P<0.001)。与CT-VFA和MFS-VFA之间的差异相比,CT-VFA和MFS&PA-VFA之间的平均差异受年龄、性别和BMI的影响较小。CT-VFA和MFS&PA-VFA之间的组内相关系数(95%CI)也大于CT-VFA和MFS-VFA之间的组内相关系数,分别为0.96(0.95-0.98)和0.76(0.64-0.84)。

结论

在本研究中,应用新开发的MFS-BIA机器结合PA-BIA设备显著提高了与CT测量的VFA的相关性,且无比例误差。这种使用先进技术的新方法可能能够提供更可靠的腹部VFA估计值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b353/9597369/c7f7c18b400b/fnut-09-950747-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验