• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医院卒中中心指定与 TVT 报告卒中之间的关系:密歇根 TAVR 经验。

The Relationship Between Hospital Stroke Center Designation and TVT Reported Stroke: The Michigan TAVR Experience.

机构信息

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jan 23;16(2):168-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.10.020.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2022.10.020
PMID:36697152
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 30-day rate of stroke after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been suggested as a hospital quality metric. Thirty-day stroke rates for nonsurgical, high, and moderate-risk TAVR trials were 3.4% to 6.1%, whereas those in the national Transcatheter Valve Therapy (TVT) Registry for the same patient population were much lower. Hospital comprehensive stroke center (CSC) is the highest designation for integrated acute stroke recognition, management, and care.

OBJECTIVES

Using Michigan TVT data, we assessed whether in-hospital post-TAVR stroke rates varied between CSC and non-CSC institutions.

METHODS

TVT data submitted from the 22 Michigan Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Collaborative participating institutions between January 1, 2016, and June 30, 2019, were included (N = 6,231). Bayesian hierarchical regression models accounting for patient clinical characteristics and hospital clustering were fitted to assess the association between hospital CSC accreditation and in-hospital post-TAVR stroke. Adjusted ORs and 95% credible intervals were estimated. The University of Michigan Institutional Review Board has waived the need for the approval of studies based on the data collected by the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium registry.

RESULTS

There were 3,882 (62.3%) patients at 9 CSC sites and 2,349 (37.7%) patients at 13 non-CSC sites. CSC sites had significantly higher rates of in-hospital post-TAVR stroke (CSC: 2.65% vs non-CSC: 1.15%; P < 0.001). After adjustment, patients who underwent TAVR at a CSC hospital had a significantly higher risk of in-hospital stroke (adjusted OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.03-4.62). However, CSC designation was not significantly associated with other important post-TAVR clinical outcomes including 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Reported Michigan Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Collaborative TVT stroke rates were significantly higher at sites with Joint Hospital Commission stroke designation status; however, other reported important clinical outcomes did not differ significantly based on this designation. CSC designation is a possible factor in stroke rate detection differences between TAVR institutions and might be a factor in the observed differences in stroke rates between TAVR trials and those reported in TVT. In addition, these data suggest that comparison between hospitals based on post-TAVR stroke rates is potentially problematic.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)后的 30 天卒中发生率已被认为是医院质量指标。非手术、高风险和中风险 TAVR 试验的 30 天卒中发生率为 3.4%至 6.1%,而同一患者人群的国家经导管瓣膜治疗(TVT)登记处的卒中发生率要低得多。综合卒中中心(CSC)是识别、管理和治疗急性卒中的最高指定中心。

目的

利用密歇根州 TVT 数据,我们评估了 CSC 和非 CSC 机构之间 TAVR 后院内卒中发生率是否存在差异。

方法

纳入 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 6 月 30 日期间,密歇根州 22 家经导管主动脉瓣置换协作参与机构提交的 TVT 数据(N=6231)。使用贝叶斯层次回归模型,根据患者的临床特征和医院聚类情况进行拟合,以评估医院 CSC 认证与 TAVR 后院内卒中之间的关联。估计了调整后的比值比和 95%可信区间。密歇根大学机构审查委员会已根据蓝十字蓝盾密歇根州心血管联合会登记处收集的数据豁免了对研究的批准。

结果

9 家 CSC 医院有 3882 名(62.3%)患者,13 家非 CSC 医院有 2349 名(37.7%)患者。CSC 医院的院内 TAVR 后卒中发生率明显较高(CSC:2.65% vs 非 CSC:1.15%;P<0.001)。调整后,在 CSC 医院接受 TAVR 的患者院内卒中风险显著升高(调整比值比:2.21;95%可信区间:1.03-4.62)。然而,CSC 认定与其他重要的 TAVR 临床结局(包括 30 天死亡率)无显著相关性。

结论

密歇根州经导管主动脉瓣置换协作 TVT 报告的卒中发生率在具有联合医院委员会卒中指定地位的机构中明显较高;然而,基于这一指定,其他报告的重要临床结局并没有显著差异。CSC 认定可能是 TAVR 机构间卒中率检测差异的一个因素,也可能是 TAVR 试验报告的卒中率与 TVT 登记处报告的卒中率之间观察到的差异的一个因素。此外,这些数据表明,基于 TAVR 后卒中率对医院进行比较可能存在问题。

相似文献

1
The Relationship Between Hospital Stroke Center Designation and TVT Reported Stroke: The Michigan TAVR Experience.医院卒中中心指定与 TVT 报告卒中之间的关系:密歇根 TAVR 经验。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2023 Jan 23;16(2):168-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2022.10.020.
2
Outcomes Following Urgent/Emergent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.紧急/即刻经导管主动脉瓣置换术后的结局:STS/ACC TVT 注册研究的见解。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun 25;11(12):1175-1185. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.002. Epub 2018 Mar 11.
3
National Variation in Hospital MTEER Outcomes and Correlation With TAVR Outcomes: STS/ACC TVT Registry Analysis.全国医院 MTEER 结果的差异及其与 TAVR 结果的相关性:STS/ACC TVT 注册分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Feb 26;17(4):505-515. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.11.012. Epub 2024 Feb 7.
4
Outcomes for the Commercial Use of Self-Expanding Prostheses in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Report From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中自膨式假体的商业应用结局:来自 STS/ACC TVT 注册研究的报告。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Oct 23;10(20):2090-2098. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.07.027.
5
Trends and Outcomes of Off-label Use of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the NCDR STS/ACC TVT Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术的超适应证使用趋势和结果:来自 NCDR STS/ACC TVT 登记处的见解。
JAMA Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;2(8):846-854. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2017.1685.
6
Outcomes of Prosthesis-Patient Mismatch Following Supra-Annular Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: From the STS/ACC TVT Registry.经导管主动脉瓣环上置换术后人工瓣膜-患者不匹配的结局:来自美国胸外科医师协会/美国心脏病学会经导管瓣膜治疗注册研究
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 10;14(9):964-976. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.03.040.
7
1-Year Clinical Outcomes in Women After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Results From the First WIN-TAVI Registry.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后女性 1 年的临床结局:来自首个 WIN-TAVI 注册研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jan 8;11(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2017.09.034.
8
Evaluating Out-of-Hospital 30-Day Mortality After Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: An STS/ACC TVT Analysis.经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术后院外 30 天死亡率评估:STS/ACC TVT 分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb 8;14(3):261-274. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.10.027.
9
Predictors and Risk Calculator of Early Unplanned Hospital Readmission Following Contemporary Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement from the STS/ACC TVT Registry.当代自膨式经导管主动脉瓣置换术后早期计划外再入院的预测因素和风险计算器:来自 STS/ACC TVT 注册研究。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Mar;21(3):263-270. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.05.032. Epub 2019 Jun 10.
10
Association of Smoking Status With Long-Term Mortality and Health Status After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.吸烟状况与经导管主动脉瓣置换术后长期死亡率和健康状况的关系:来自胸外科医师学会/美国心脏病学会经导管瓣膜治疗登记处的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Aug 20;8(16):e011766. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.011766. Epub 2019 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
[Advances in stroke after transcatheter aortic valve replacement].经导管主动脉瓣置换术后卒中的进展
Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2025 Mar 25;54(2):167-174. doi: 10.3724/zdxbyxb-2024-0414.
2
When brain and heart collide: a deeper dive into treatment pathways of stroke complicating TAVI.当大脑与心脏碰撞:深入探究经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)并发中风的治疗途径
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2025 Jul;40(3):657-668. doi: 10.1007/s12928-025-01121-w. Epub 2025 Mar 29.
3
Cerebrovascular events after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
经导管主动脉瓣植入术后的脑血管事件。
EuroIntervention. 2024 Jul 1;20(13):e793-e805. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-01087.
4
Association of Bovine Arch Anatomy With Incident Stroke After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后牛主动脉弓解剖结构与新发卒中的关联
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Feb 20;13(4):e032963. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032963. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
5
Comparison of outcomes of self-expanding versus balloon-expandable valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of randomized and propensity-matched studies.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中自膨式与球囊扩张式瓣膜的结局比较:随机对照和倾向匹配研究的荟萃分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2023 Jul 31;23(1):382. doi: 10.1186/s12872-023-03397-3.