• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经颅直流电刺激在神经康复中的安全性

Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurorehabilitation.

作者信息

Ko Myoung-Hwan

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Korea.

出版信息

Brain Neurorehabil. 2021 Mar 25;14(1):e9. doi: 10.12786/bn.2021.14.e9. eCollection 2021 Mar.

DOI:10.12786/bn.2021.14.e9
PMID:36742105
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9879413/
Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has considerable potential as a useful method in the field of neurorehabilitation. However, the safety of tDCS for the human is primarily based on theoretical evidence related to electricity, and the safety information of applying tDCS to the human is only available from researcher's reporting. Based on tDCS studies with human and animal subjects and simulation-based studies of the safety of current stimulation in the past 20 years, this review investigated the safety of tDCS application to the human body. No severe complications have been reported in either adults or children for tDCS at an intensity of 4 mA or less, within a period of 60 minutes per day, using commonly applied 25 or 35 cm electrodes. According to animal studies, the amount of electricity used for tDCS is less than 5% of the amount that permanently changes brain tissue, thereby ensuring safety to a certain extent. In order to increase the efficacy of tDCS for neurorehabilitation and to minimize even trivial complications in the human screening of exclusion criteria should be conducted with detailed observations of complications.

摘要

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)作为神经康复领域一种有用的方法具有相当大的潜力。然而,tDCS对人体的安全性主要基于与电相关的理论证据,而将tDCS应用于人体的安全信息仅来自研究人员的报告。基于过去20年对人类和动物受试者的tDCS研究以及基于模拟的电流刺激安全性研究,本综述调查了tDCS应用于人体的安全性。对于每天60分钟以内、使用常用的25或35厘米电极、强度为4毫安或更低的tDCS,成人或儿童均未报告严重并发症。根据动物研究,用于tDCS的电量小于永久改变脑组织电量的5%,从而在一定程度上确保了安全性。为了提高tDCS在神经康复中的疗效,并在人体筛查中尽量减少甚至轻微的并发症,应通过详细观察并发症来制定排除标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d2d/9879413/594d18f1d0c8/bn-14-e9-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d2d/9879413/594d18f1d0c8/bn-14-e9-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d2d/9879413/594d18f1d0c8/bn-14-e9-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurorehabilitation.经颅直流电刺激在神经康复中的安全性
Brain Neurorehabil. 2021 Mar 25;14(1):e9. doi: 10.12786/bn.2021.14.e9. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in ADHD: A Systematic Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Protocol-induced Electrical Field Modeling Results.经颅直流电刺激治疗注意缺陷多动障碍:疗效、安全性的系统评价,以及基于方案的电场建模结果。
Neurosci Bull. 2020 Oct;36(10):1191-1212. doi: 10.1007/s12264-020-00501-x. Epub 2020 May 16.
3
Transcranial direct current stimulation as a motor neurorehabilitation tool: an empirical review.经颅直流电刺激作为一种运动神经康复工具:实证综述。
Biomed Eng Online. 2017 Aug 18;16(Suppl 1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12938-017-0361-8.
4
The effect of high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation intensity on motor performance in healthy adults: a randomized controlled trial.高清经颅直流电刺激强度对健康成年人运动表现的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2021 Jun 26;18(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12984-021-00899-z.
5
Tolerability of Repeated Application of Transcranial Electrical Stimulation with Limited Outputs to Healthy Subjects.对健康受试者重复应用有限输出的经颅电刺激的耐受性
Brain Stimul. 2016 Sep-Oct;9(5):740-754. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 May 24.
6
The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Electrode Size and Current Intensity on Motor Cortical Excitability: Evidence From Single and Repeated Sessions.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)电极大小和电流强度对运动皮质兴奋性的影响:单次和重复刺激的证据
Brain Stimul. 2016 Jan-Feb;9(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
7
The Effect of a Single Session of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Balance in Healthy Individuals: A Systematic Review and Best Evidence Synthesis.单次非侵入性脑刺激对健康个体平衡的影响:系统评价和最佳证据综合。
Brain Connect. 2021 Nov;11(9):695-716. doi: 10.1089/brain.2020.0872. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
8
Differential modulation of corticospinal excitability by different current densities of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.不同阳极经颅直流电刺激电流密度对皮质脊髓兴奋性的差异调节。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 22;8(8):e72254. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072254. eCollection 2013.
9
Updated Technique for Reliable, Easy, and Tolerated Transcranial Electrical Stimulation Including Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.可靠、简便且耐受良好的经颅电刺激(包括经颅直流电刺激)的更新技术
J Vis Exp. 2020 Jan 3(155). doi: 10.3791/59204.
10
Low Intensity Focused tDCS Over the Motor Cortex Shows Inefficacy to Improve Motor Imagery Performance.对运动皮层进行低强度聚焦直流电刺激对改善运动想象表现无效。
Front Neurosci. 2017 Jul 6;11:391. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00391. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing tDCS parameters for post-stroke upper limb recovery: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.优化经颅直流电刺激参数以促进中风后上肢功能恢复:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
Int J Surg Protoc. 2025 May 27;29(3):68-72. doi: 10.1097/SP9.0000000000000046. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation During Extended Reality Exercises for Cortical, Neuromuscular, and Clinical Recovery of Stroke Survivors.在扩展现实训练期间经颅直流电刺激对中风幸存者皮质、神经肌肉及临床恢复的影响
Neural Plast. 2025 Jul 15;2025:5688648. doi: 10.1155/np/5688648. eCollection 2025.
3
Advances in Neuromodulation Techniques for Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Comprehensive Review.

本文引用的文献

1
The Effects of Bi-Anodal tDCS Over the Prefrontal Cortex Regions With Extracephalic Reference Placement on Insight Levels and Cardio-Respiratory and Autonomic Functions in Schizophrenia Patients and Exploratory Biomarker Analyses for Treatment Response.额极双相经颅直流电刺激联合颅外参考电极对精神分裂症患者洞察水平及心肺自主功能的影响及治疗反应的探索性生物标志物分析
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021 Jan 20;24(1):40-53. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa063.
2
Cathodal tDCS exerts neuroprotective effect in rat brain after acute ischemic stroke.经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)对急性缺血性脑卒中后大鼠脑具有神经保护作用。
BMC Neurosci. 2020 May 12;21(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s12868-020-00570-8.
3
失语症康复的神经调节技术进展:综述
Med Sci Monit. 2025 Jul 9;31:e947213. doi: 10.12659/MSM.947213.
4
Effects of noninvasive brain stimulation on motor functions in animal models of ischemia and trauma in the central nervous system.非侵入性脑刺激对中枢神经系统缺血和创伤动物模型运动功能的影响。
Neural Regen Res. 2026 Apr 1;21(4):1264-1276. doi: 10.4103/NRR.NRR-D-24-01613. Epub 2025 Jun 19.
5
Resting-state hemodynamic changes and effects on upper limb function after multi-channel transcranial direct current stimulation to the ipsilesional primary motor cortex and anterior intraparietal sulcus in stroke patients: an fNIRS pilot study.中风患者患侧初级运动皮层和顶内沟前部多通道经颅直流电刺激后静息态血流动力学变化及其对上肢功能的影响:一项功能近红外光谱初步研究
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Apr 16;22(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01618-8.
6
HD-tDCS effects on social impairment in autism spectrum disorder with sensory processing abnormalities: a randomized controlled trial.高频重复经颅磁刺激对伴有感觉加工异常的自闭症谱系障碍社交障碍的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 21;15(1):9772. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93631-z.
7
Transcranial direct current stimulation for patients with walking difficulties caused by cerebral small vessel disease: a randomized controlled study.经颅直流电刺激治疗脑小血管病所致行走困难患者:一项随机对照研究。
Front Aging Neurosci. 2025 Jan 7;16:1511287. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2024.1511287. eCollection 2024.
8
The Optimized Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation With Simulation Using MRI.基于磁共振成像模拟的优化经颅直流电刺激
Brain Neurorehabil. 2024 Nov 20;17(3):e21. doi: 10.12786/bn.2024.17.e21. eCollection 2024 Nov.
9
Optimized trans-cranial direct current stimulation for prolonged consciousness disorder in a patient with titanium mesh cranioplasty.钛网颅骨修补术后意识障碍患者的经颅直流电刺激优化治疗。
Neurol Sci. 2024 Jul;45(7):3513-3516. doi: 10.1007/s10072-024-07516-6. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
10
Electric field simulation and appropriate electrode positioning for optimized transcranial direct current stimulation of stroke patients: an in Silico model.电场模拟及优化脑卒中患者经颅直流电刺激的电极定位:一项计算机模型研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 3;14(1):2850. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52874-y.
Safety and tolerability of transcranial magnetic and direct current stimulation in children: Prospective single center evidence from 3.5 million stimulations.
经颅磁刺激和直流电刺激在儿童中的安全性和耐受性:来自 350 万次刺激的前瞻性单中心证据。
Brain Stimul. 2020 May-Jun;13(3):565-575. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.12.025. Epub 2019 Dec 30.
4
Investigation into the effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on cardiac pacemakers.经颅直流电刺激对心脏起搏器影响的研究。
Brain Stimul. 2020 Jan-Feb;13(1):89-95. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2019.08.010. Epub 2019 Aug 17.
5
Examining bi-anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex coupled with bilateral extracephalic references as a treatment for negative symptoms in non-acute schizophrenia patients: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial.研究双阳极经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)联合双侧额外侧参考电极治疗非急性期精神分裂症阴性症状的疗效:一项随机、双盲、假刺激对照试验。
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2020 Jan 10;96:109715. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109715. Epub 2019 Jul 27.
6
Safety of transcranial direct current stimulation in a patient with deep brain stimulation electrodes.经颅直流电刺激在一名植入脑深部刺激电极患者中的安全性
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2019 Mar;77(3):174-178. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X20190019.
7
Modeling Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation-Induced Electric Fields in Children and Adults.儿童和成人经颅直流电刺激诱导电场的建模
Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Jul 3;12:268. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00268. eCollection 2018.
8
Scribonius Largus (probably before 1CE-after 48CE).斯克里博尼乌斯·拉古斯(约公元1世纪前 - 公元48年后)。
J Neurol. 2018 Oct;265(10):2466-2468. doi: 10.1007/s00415-018-8739-5. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
9
Safety of repeated sessions of transcranial direct current stimulation: A systematic review.重复经颅直流电刺激的安全性:系统评价。
Brain Stimul. 2018 Mar-Apr;11(2):278-288. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.10.020. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
10
Bilateral extracephalic transcranial direct current stimulation improves endurance performance in healthy individuals.双侧颅外经颅直流电刺激可提高健康个体的耐力表现。
Brain Stimul. 2018 Jan-Feb;11(1):108-117. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2017.09.017. Epub 2017 Oct 5.