对不同强度重复耐力训练课程的情感反应:一项随机试验。

Affective Responses to Repeated Endurance Training Sessions with Different Intensities: A Randomized Trial.

作者信息

Bratland-Sanda Solfrid, Elieson Anine M, Kråkemo Martine Aa, Reinboth Michael S

机构信息

Department of Sport, Physical Education and Outdoor Sciences, University of South-Eastern Norway, Bø, Telemark, NORWAY.

出版信息

Int J Exerc Sci. 2022 Jan 1;15(5):152-165. doi: 10.70252/ICIZ2587. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

The purpose was to examine differences in affective responses to repeated sessions of endurance training with different intensities in healthy adults. Thirty young, healthy, and recreationally physically active adults (50% women, age 24.4 ± 6.0 years, VO 48.6 ± 7.4 ml·kg·min, BMI 23.5 ± 2.4 kg·m) performed a VO test. They were randomized to four sessions of either high intensity sprint interval training (SPRINT, n=10, 5 · 30-sec at >95 of HR, 4-min recovery between intervals), high intensity aerobic interval training (HAIT, n=10, 4 · 4-min at ~90% of HR, 4-min recovery between intervals) or moderate intensity continuous training (MIT, n=10, 50-min at ~75% HR). Assessment during and after each session included HR, La, Borg ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), affective state (positive/negative), valence (pleasure/displeasure), arousal (calmness/excitement), tension, irritation, pain, exhaustion, satisfaction, and motivation. HR, La and Borg RPE were higher in SPRINT and HAIT compared to MIT ( < 0.001), no differences between SPRINT and HAIT. Displeasure and arousal were greater in SPRINT compared to HAIT ( < 0.05) and MIT ( < 0.001). Within each session, between-group effects showed that SPRINT differed from HAIT and MIT on valence ( < 0.01) and arousal ( < 0.01), and MIT differed from HAIT and SPRINT on La ( < 0.001) and HR ( < 0.001). In conclusion, repeated sessions of HAIT produced similar physiological responses as SPRINT, and similar affective responses as MIT.

摘要

目的是研究健康成年人对不同强度的重复耐力训练课程的情感反应差异。30名年轻、健康且有休闲体育活动习惯的成年人(50%为女性,年龄24.4±6.0岁,VO₂max 48.6±7.4 ml·kg⁻¹·min⁻¹,BMI 23.5±2.4 kg·m⁻²)进行了一次VO₂max测试。他们被随机分为四组,分别进行高强度冲刺间歇训练(SPRINT,n = 10,5次30秒,心率>95%,组间休息4分钟)、高强度有氧间歇训练(HAIT,n = 10,4次4分钟,心率约90%,组间休息4分钟)或中等强度持续训练(MIT,n = 10,50分钟,心率约75%)。每次训练期间和之后的评估包括心率、血乳酸、伯格感知运动用力评分(RPE)、情感状态(积极/消极)、效价(愉悦/不愉悦)、唤醒度(平静/兴奋)、紧张、烦躁、疼痛、疲惫、满意度和动机。与MIT相比,SPRINT和HAIT的心率、血乳酸和伯格RPE更高(P<0.001),SPRINT和HAIT之间无差异。与HAIT相比,SPRINT的不愉悦感和唤醒度更高(P<0.05),与MIT相比更高(P<0.001)。在每次训练中,组间效应表明,SPRINT在效价(P<0.01)和唤醒度(P<0.01)方面与HAIT和MIT不同,MIT在血乳酸(P<0.001)和心率(P<0.001)方面与HAIT和SPRINT不同。总之,重复进行HAIT课程产生的生理反应与SPRINT相似,情感反应与MIT相似。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索