患者接受全膝关节置换术的适宜性和良好预后的预测概率。
Patient appropriateness for total knee arthroplasty and predicted probability of a good outcome.
机构信息
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
出版信息
RMD Open. 2023 Apr;9(2). doi: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002808.
OBJECTIVES
One-fifth of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) recipients experience a suboptimal outcome. Incorporation of patients' preferences in TKA assessment may improve outcomes. We determined the discriminant ability of preoperative measures of TKA need, readiness/willingness and expectations for a good TKA outcome.
METHODS
In patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) undergoing primary TKA, we preoperatively assessed TKA need (Western Ontario-McMaster Universities OA Index (WOMAC) Pain Score and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) function, arthritis coping), health status, readiness (Patient Acceptable Symptom State, depressive symptoms), willingness (definitely yes-yes/no) and expectations (outcomes deemed 'very important'). A good outcome was defined as symptom improvement (met Outcome Measures in Rheumatology and Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) responder criteria) and satisfaction with results 1 year post TKA. Using logistic regression, we assessed independent outcome predictors, model discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, AUC) and the predicted probability of a good outcome for different need, readiness/willingness and expectations scenarios.
RESULTS
Of 1,053 TKA recipients (mean age 66.9 years (SD 8.8); 58.6% women), 78.1% achieved a good outcome. With TKA need alone (WOMAC pain subscale, KOOS physical function short-form), model discrimination was good (AUC 0.67, 95% CI 0.63 to 0.71). Inclusion of readiness/willingness, depressive symptoms and expectations regarding kneeling, stair climbing, well-being and performing recreational activities improved discrimination (p=0.01; optimism corrected AUC 0.70, 0.66-0.74). The predicted probability of a good outcome ranged from 44.4% (33.9-55.5) to 92.4% (88.4-95.1) depending on level of TKA need, readiness/willingness, depressive symptoms and surgical expectations.
CONCLUSIONS
Although external validation is required, our findings suggest that incorporation of patients' TKA readiness, willingness and expectations in TKA decision-making may improve the proportion of recipients that experience a good outcome.
目的
五分之一的全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者的治疗效果并不理想。在 TKA 评估中纳入患者的偏好可能会改善治疗结果。我们旨在确定术前 TKA 需求、准备/意愿和对 TKA 良好结果的期望的术前测量指标的判别能力。
方法
在患有膝关节骨关节炎(OA)并接受初次 TKA 的患者中,我们在术前评估了 TKA 的需求(西部安大略省麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)疼痛评分和膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结局评分(KOOS)功能、关节炎应对)、健康状况、准备情况(患者可接受的症状状态、抑郁症状)、意愿(明确的是/是/否)和期望(认为“非常重要”的结果)。良好的结果定义为症状改善(符合风湿病和骨关节炎结果研究协会国际(OMERACT-OARSI)应答标准)和 TKA 后 1 年对结果的满意度。使用逻辑回归,我们评估了独立的结果预测因素、模型判别力(接受者操作特征曲线下面积,AUC)以及不同需求、准备/意愿和期望情况下良好结果的预测概率。
结果
在 1053 名 TKA 患者中(平均年龄 66.9 岁(SD 8.8);58.6%女性),78.1%的患者取得了良好的结果。仅使用 TKA 需求(WOMAC 疼痛子量表、KOOS 物理功能简表),模型判别力较好(AUC 0.67,95%CI 0.63-0.71)。纳入准备/意愿、抑郁症状以及对跪姿、爬楼梯、幸福感和进行娱乐活动的期望改善了判别力(p=0.01;经乐观校正后的 AUC 为 0.70,0.66-0.74)。良好结果的预测概率范围为 44.4%(33.9-55.5)至 92.4%(88.4-95.1),取决于 TKA 需求、准备/意愿、抑郁症状和手术期望的水平。
结论
尽管需要进行外部验证,但我们的研究结果表明,在 TKA 决策中纳入患者的 TKA 准备、意愿和期望可能会提高体验良好结果的患者比例。