• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

序列效应与言语处理:口音内和口音间切换说话者的认知负荷。

Sequence effects and speech processing: cognitive load for speaker-switching within and across accents.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St Louis, MO, USA.

Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, Paseo Mikeletegi, 69, 20009, Donostia-San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, Spain.

出版信息

Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb;31(1):176-186. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02322-1. Epub 2023 Jul 13.

DOI:10.3758/s13423-023-02322-1
PMID:37442872
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10867039/
Abstract

Prior work in speech processing indicates that listening tasks with multiple speakers (as opposed to a single speaker) result in slower and less accurate processing. Notably, the trial-to-trial cognitive demands of switching between speakers or switching between accents have yet to be examined. We used pupillometry, a physiological index of cognitive load, to examine the demands of processing first (L1) and second (L2) language-accented speech when listening to sentences produced by the same speaker consecutively (no switch), a novel speaker of the same accent (within-accent switch), and a novel speaker with a different accent (across-accent switch). Inspired by research on sequential adjustments in cognitive control, we aimed to identify the cognitive demands of accommodating a novel speaker and accent by examining the trial-to-trial changes in pupil dilation during speech processing. Our results indicate that switching between speakers was more cognitively demanding than listening to the same speaker consecutively. Additionally, switching to a novel speaker with a different accent was more cognitively demanding than switching between speakers of the same accent. However, there was an asymmetry for across-accent switches, such that switching from an L1 to an L2 accent was more demanding than vice versa. Findings from the present study align with work examining multi-talker processing costs, and provide novel evidence that listeners dynamically adjust cognitive processing to accommodate speaker and accent variability. We discuss these novel findings in the context of an active control model and auditory streaming framework of speech processing.

摘要

先前的语音处理研究表明,与单一说话人相比,多说话人(而非单一说话人)的聆听任务会导致处理速度更慢且准确性更低。值得注意的是,目前尚未研究在说话人之间或口音之间切换的试次间认知需求。我们使用瞳孔测量法(一种认知负荷的生理指标),来检验当连续聆听同一说话人(无切换)、同一口音的新说话人(口音内切换)和不同口音的新说话人(口音间切换)所产生的句子时,处理第一语言(L1)和第二语言(L2)带口音的语音的认知需求。受认知控制的序列调整研究的启发,我们旨在通过检验在处理语音过程中瞳孔扩张的试次间变化,来识别适应新说话人和口音的认知需求。研究结果表明,在说话人之间切换比连续聆听同一说话人更具认知挑战性。此外,与口音内切换相比,切换到具有不同口音的新说话人更具认知挑战性。然而,口音间切换存在不对称性,即从 L1 口音切换到 L2 口音比反之更具挑战性。本研究的发现与多说话人处理成本的研究结果一致,并提供了新的证据,表明听者动态调整认知处理以适应说话人和口音的可变性。我们在主动控制模型和语音处理的听觉流框架的背景下讨论了这些新发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbf2/10867039/f739ea839e42/13423_2023_2322_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbf2/10867039/5bf4ec6359b7/13423_2023_2322_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbf2/10867039/927b4ee92b9b/13423_2023_2322_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbf2/10867039/6ab179d39b0b/13423_2023_2322_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbf2/10867039/f739ea839e42/13423_2023_2322_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbf2/10867039/5bf4ec6359b7/13423_2023_2322_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbf2/10867039/927b4ee92b9b/13423_2023_2322_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbf2/10867039/6ab179d39b0b/13423_2023_2322_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dbf2/10867039/f739ea839e42/13423_2023_2322_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Sequence effects and speech processing: cognitive load for speaker-switching within and across accents.序列效应与言语处理:口音内和口音间切换说话者的认知负荷。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb;31(1):176-186. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02322-1. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
2
Expectations about the source of a speaker's accent affect accent adaptation.说话者口音来源的期望会影响口音适应。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2019 May;145(5):3218. doi: 10.1121/1.5108831.
3
Where does a 'foreign' accent matter? German, Spanish and Singaporean listeners' reactions to Dutch-accented English, and standard British and American English accents.“外国”口音重要吗?德国、西班牙和新加坡听众对荷兰口音英语以及标准的英国和美国英语口音的反应。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 29;15(4):e0231089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231089. eCollection 2020.
4
Sentence context influences the subjective perception of foreign accents.句子语境会影响对外语口音的主观感知。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2017 Jan;172:71-76. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.11.011. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
5
Visual information affects adaptation to novel talkers: Ethnicity-specific and ethnicity-independent learning of L2-accented speech.视觉信息影响对新说话者的适应:第二语言口音言语的特定族裔和非特定族裔学习。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2023 Oct 1;154(4):2290-2304. doi: 10.1121/10.0021289.
6
Second-language experience and speech-in-noise recognition: effects of talker-listener accent similarity.第二语言经验和噪声环境下的言语识别:说话者-听者口音相似性的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Sep;130(3):1653-62. doi: 10.1121/1.3613698.
7
Exposure to nonnative-accented speech reduces listening effort and improves social judgments of the speaker.接触带有非本地口音的演讲会降低倾听者的努力程度,并提高他们对演讲者的社会评价。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 16;13(1):2808. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29082-1.
8
Listening effort during speech perception enhances auditory and lexical processing for non-native listeners and accents.在言语感知过程中集中注意力可以增强非母语者和非本地口音者的听觉和词汇处理能力。
Cognition. 2018 Oct;179:163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 26.
9
Speaker and Accent Variation Are Handled Differently: Evidence in Native and Non-Native Listeners.说话者和口音变化的处理方式不同:来自母语和非母语听众的证据。
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 16;11(6):e0156870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156870. eCollection 2016.
10
Perception of intelligibility and qualities of non-native accented speakers.对非母语口音者的可理解性和音质的感知。
J Commun Disord. 2018 Jan-Feb;71:37-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2017.12.006. Epub 2017 Dec 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Pupil Size Tracks the Effects of Global Context and Semantic Ambiguity on Word-Meaning Processing.瞳孔大小跟踪全局语境和语义模糊对词义加工的影响。
J Cogn. 2025 Jul 29;8(1):42. doi: 10.5334/joc.454. eCollection 2025.
2
Multiple timescales of context influence perceptual sensitivity to common pairings of musical pitch and timbre.上下文的多个时间尺度会影响对音高和音色常见组合的感知敏感性。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 18;20(7):e0328490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328490. eCollection 2025.
3
Influence of talker and accent variability on rapid adaptation and generalization to non-native accented speech in younger and older adults.

本文引用的文献

1
Attention, task demands, and multitalker processing costs in speech perception.注意、任务需求以及多说话人处理在言语感知中的代价。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2021 Dec;47(12):1673-1680. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000963.
2
GazeR: A Package for Processing Gaze Position and Pupil Size Data.GazeR:用于处理注视位置和瞳孔大小数据的软件包。
Behav Res Methods. 2020 Oct;52(5):2232-2255. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01374-8.
3
Task-evoked pupil response for accurately recognized accented speech.任务诱发瞳孔反应对准确识别带口音的语音。
说话者和口音变异性对年轻人和老年人快速适应及泛化到非母语口音语音的影响。
Audit Percept Cogn. 2024;7(2):110-139. doi: 10.1080/25742442.2024.2345568. Epub 2024 Apr 28.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2020 Feb;147(2):EL151. doi: 10.1121/10.0000718.
4
Time and information in perceptual adaptation to speech.言语知觉适应中的时间和信息。
Cognition. 2019 Nov;192:103982. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2019.05.019. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
5
The human task-evoked pupillary response function is linear: Implications for baseline response scaling in pupillometry.人类任务诱发的瞳孔反应函数是线性的:对瞳孔测量中基线反应标度的影响。
Behav Res Methods. 2019 Apr;51(2):865-878. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1134-4.
6
Influence of talker discontinuity on cortical dynamics of auditory spatial attention.说话人不连续性对听觉空间注意的皮质动力学的影响。
Neuroimage. 2018 Oct 1;179:548-556. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.06.067. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
7
Eyes and ears: Using eye tracking and pupillometry to understand challenges to speech recognition.耳目一新:运用眼动追踪和瞳孔测量技术理解言语识别障碍。
Hear Res. 2018 Nov;369:56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2018.04.013. Epub 2018 May 4.
8
Different levels of learning interact to shape the congruency sequence effect.不同层次的学习相互作用,以塑造一致性序列效应。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2016 Apr;42(4):566-83. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000182. Epub 2015 Sep 21.
9
The Impact of Auditory Spectral Resolution on Listening Effort Revealed by Pupil Dilation.瞳孔扩张揭示听觉频谱分辨率对听力努力的影响。
Ear Hear. 2015 Jul-Aug;36(4):e153-65. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000145.
10
The congruency sequence effect 3.0: a critical test of conflict adaptation.一致性序列效应3.0:冲突适应的关键测试
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 23;9(10):e110462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110462. eCollection 2014.