Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1301, USA.
School of Public Health, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 80523-1612, USA.
Sci Rep. 2023 Sep 11;13(1):14934. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-42165-3.
Both machine learning and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic models are becoming essential components of the drug development process. Integrating the predictive capabilities of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models within machine learning (ML) pipelines could offer significant benefits in improving the accuracy and scope of drug screening and evaluation procedures. Here, we describe the development and testing of a self-contained machine learning module capable of faithfully recapitulating summary pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters produced by a full PBPK model, given a set of input drug-specific and regimen-specific information. Because of its widespread use in characterizing the disposition of orally administered drugs, the PBPK model chosen to demonstrate the methodology was an open-source implementation of a state-of-the-art compartmental and transit model called OpenCAT. The model was tested for drug formulations spanning a large range of solubility and absorption characteristics, and was evaluated for concordance against predictions of OpenCAT and relevant experimental data. In general, the values predicted by the ML models were within 20% of those of the PBPK model across the range of drug and formulation properties. However, summary PK parameter predictions from both the ML model and full PBPK model were occasionally poor with respect to those derived from experiments, suggesting deficiencies in the underlying PBPK model.
机器学习和基于生理学的药代动力学模型正成为药物开发过程中不可或缺的组成部分。在机器学习 (ML) 管道中整合基于生理学的药代动力学 (PBPK) 模型的预测能力,可以在提高药物筛选和评估程序的准确性和范围方面带来显著的好处。在这里,我们描述了一个独立的机器学习模块的开发和测试,该模块能够根据一组特定于药物和方案的输入信息,忠实地再现由完整 PBPK 模型产生的总结药代动力学 (PK) 参数。由于它在描述口服药物处置方面的广泛应用,因此选择用于演示方法的 PBPK 模型是一种称为 OpenCAT 的最先进的房室和转运模型的开源实现。该模型针对跨越溶解度和吸收特性广泛范围的药物制剂进行了测试,并针对与 OpenCAT 和相关实验数据的一致性进行了评估。一般来说,ML 模型预测的值与 PBPK 模型在药物和制剂特性范围内的预测值相差在 20%以内。然而,ML 模型和完整 PBPK 模型的总结 PK 参数预测有时与实验得出的值相差较大,这表明基础 PBPK 模型存在缺陷。