回顾性分析内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎时胰管支架植入的临床疗效。
A retrospective analysis of the clinical efficacy of pancreatic duct stent implantation in the management of acute biliary pancreatitis requiring ERCP.
机构信息
General Surgery Center, People's Hospital of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region, Yinchuan, Ningxia, China.
General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Medical University, Xi 'an, Shaanxi, China.
出版信息
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Dec 15;28(1):594. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01557-x.
BACKGROUND
This study aimed to investigate the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety of pancreatic duct stenting in managing acute biliary pancreatitis (ABP) necessitating endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). It further aimed to provide valuable insights for subsequent clinical diagnosis and treatment.
METHODS
This research employs an observational retrospective case-control study design, encompassing patients with ABP who underwent ERCP at the hepatobiliary surgery department of the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University between August 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020. A total of 229 cases were screened based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Regardless of ABP severity, patients were categorized into the stent group (141) and the non-stent group (88). Changes in blood amylase (Amy), lipase (LIP), leukocyte count (WBC), total bilirubin (TBIL), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), hematocrit (HCT), and creatinine (CR) were compared between the two groups. Moreover, variables such as recovery time for oral feeding, hospitalization duration, hospitalization costs, local complications, systemic complications, and new organ failure were recorded to assess the therapeutic effect of pancreatic duct stenting.
RESULTS
No significant differences were observed in gender, age, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II score, ABP severity grade, organ failure (OF), cholangitis, or biliary obstruction between the pancreatic stent and non-stent groups (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications related to acute pancreatitis between the two groups (P > 0.05). The median fasting and hospitalization times of patients in the stent group were significantly shorter than those in the non-stent group (P < 0.05). No significant differences between the groups were observed in hospitalization costs and in-hospital mortality (P > 0.05). There were no significant variations in white blood cell (WBC) count, TBIL, ALT, and creatinine (Cr) at admission, 72 h, and in the differences between the two groups (P > 0.05). The levels of Amy at admission and 72 h in the stent group were significantly higher than those in the non-stent group (P < 0.05). The differences in LIP and HCT in the stent group were considerably higher than in the non-stent group (P < 0.05). Although no significant differences were observed in mean Amy and LIP between the two groups (P > 0.05), the mean 72-h HCT in the stent group was 38.39% (95% confidence interval [CI] 37.82%-38.96%) was lower than that in the non-stent group (39.44%, 95% CI 38.70-40.17%) (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
In the stent group, feeding time and hospital stay were significantly shorter than those in the non-stent group. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in the incidence of complications and mortality. The HCT value decreased more rapidly in the stent group. Early pancreatic stent implantation demonstrated the potential to shorten the eating and hospitalization duration of patients with ABP, facilitating their prompt recovery.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
This study was registered as a single-center, retrospective case series (ChiCTR1800019734) at chictr.org.cn.
背景
本研究旨在探讨在需要内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)治疗的急性胆源性胰腺炎(ABP)中,胰管支架置入的可行性、有效性和安全性,并为后续临床诊断和治疗提供有价值的见解。
方法
本研究采用观察性回顾性病例对照研究设计,纳入 2018 年 8 月 1 日至 2020 年 12 月 31 日期间在宁夏医科大学总医院肝胆外科接受 ERCP 的 ABP 患者。根据纳入和排除标准,共筛选出 229 例患者。无论 ABP 的严重程度如何,患者均分为支架组(141 例)和非支架组(88 例)。比较两组间血淀粉酶(Amy)、脂肪酶(LIP)、白细胞计数(WBC)、总胆红素(TBIL)、丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、红细胞压积(HCT)和肌酐(CR)的变化。此外,记录恢复口服喂养时间、住院时间、住院费用、局部并发症、全身并发症和新器官衰竭等变量,以评估胰管支架置入的治疗效果。
结果
支架组和非支架组在性别、年龄、急性生理学和慢性健康评估(APACHE)Ⅱ评分、ABP 严重程度分级、器官衰竭(OF)、胆管炎或胆道梗阻方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。两组间与急性胰腺炎相关并发症的发生率无显著差异(P>0.05)。支架组患者的空腹和住院时间中位数明显短于非支架组(P<0.05)。两组间住院费用和住院死亡率无显著差异(P>0.05)。两组入院时、72 小时时的白细胞计数(WBC)、TBIL、ALT 和肌酐(Cr)水平无显著差异(P>0.05)。支架组入院时和 72 小时时的 Amy 水平明显高于非支架组(P<0.05)。支架组的 LIP 和 HCT 差异明显高于非支架组(P<0.05)。两组间 Amy 和 LIP 的平均水平无显著差异(P>0.05),但支架组的平均 72 小时 HCT 为 38.39%(95%置信区间[CI]37.82%-38.96%)低于非支架组(39.44%,95%CI 38.70%-40.17%)(P<0.05)。
结论
支架组的进食时间和住院时间明显短于非支架组。两组间并发症和死亡率无显著差异。支架组的 HCT 值下降更快。早期胰管支架植入术可能缩短 ABP 患者的进食和住院时间,促进其快速康复。
试验注册
本研究在 chictr.org.cn 上作为单中心回顾性病例系列(ChiCTR1800019734)进行注册。