Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Apr;31(4):2557-2567. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14807-3. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
Surgery for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is jeopardized by significant risk of early recurrence (≤ 6 months). The aim of the present study is to analyze the oncological benefit provided by laparoscopic over open approach for iCCA in patients with high risk of very early recurrence (VER).
A total of 532 liver resections (LR) were performed for iCCA [265 by minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and 267 with open approach, matched through a 1:1 propensity score] and stratified using the postoperative prediction model of VER. Outcomes were compared between open and laparoscopic approaches, specifically evaluating oncological benefit.
The percentage of patients with high risk of VER was similar (32.7% in the laparoscopic group and 35.3% in the open group, pNS). The number of retrieved nodes as well as the rate and depth of negative resection margins were comparable between laparoscopic and open. The surgery-adjuvant treatment interval was shorter in laparoscopic patients in the overall series, as well in the subgroup of high risk of VER. The rate of patients starting adjuvant treatments within 2 months from surgery was higher in laparoscopic group compared with open group. In VER high-risk group both disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly improved in MIS compared with open group (p = 0.032 and p = 0.026, respectively).
In patients with high risk of VER, laparoscopy translates into an advantage in terms of recurrence-free survival, likely related to lower biological impact of surgery, together with a shorter interval between surgery and start of adjuvant treatments, even allowing for a higher number of patients to start adjuvant therapies within 2 months from resection.
肝内胆管癌(iCCA)的手术因早期复发(≤6 个月)的风险较高而受到威胁。本研究的目的是分析腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗高早期复发(VER)风险 iCCA 患者的肿瘤学获益。
共对 532 例 iCCA 行肝切除术(LR)[265 例采用微创外科(MIS),267 例采用开腹手术,通过 1:1 倾向评分匹配],并根据术后 VER 预测模型进行分层。比较了开腹和腹腔镜两种方法的结果,特别是评估了肿瘤学获益。
高 VER 风险患者的比例相似(腹腔镜组为 32.7%,开腹组为 35.3%,pNS)。腹腔镜组和开腹组的淋巴结检出数、阴性切缘率和深度相当。在整个系列和高 VER 风险亚组中,腹腔镜患者的手术辅助治疗间隔更短。腹腔镜组患者在手术后 2 个月内开始辅助治疗的比例高于开腹组。在 VER 高风险组,MIS 组的无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)均显著优于开腹组(p=0.032 和 p=0.026)。
在 VER 高风险患者中,腹腔镜手术在无复发生存方面具有优势,这可能与手术的生物学影响较低有关,同时手术和开始辅助治疗之间的间隔较短,甚至可以使更多的患者在手术后 2 个月内开始辅助治疗。