就生活质量而言,场所质量成为新冠疫情第三波中的赢家。这一认知会促进地理心理学的发展吗?

Quality of place as the winner of the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in terms of quality of life. Will this knowledge strengthen the development of geographical psychology?

作者信息

Murgaš František, Petrovič František, Tirpáková Anna

机构信息

Department of Geography, Technical University in Liberec, Studentská 2, 461 17, Liberec, Czech Republic.

Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Tr. A. Hlinku 1, 949 01, Nitra, Slovakia.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Feb 10;10(4):e26261. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26261. eCollection 2024 Feb 29.

Abstract

The paper is focused on the third wave of the pandemic and its comparison with the first wave in terms of the quality of life of university students in Czechia. In the first wave, the society came together, with solidarity being a prominent manifestation. The third wave differed from the first one in medical (vaccination was already available) as well as social terms. The paper has two objectives, the first is to measure the quality of life and related variables in the third wave of the pandemic and to compare the values found in the third wave with those in the first wave of the pandemic. The second objective is to identify which of the factors related to quality of life are predictors of that quality. The hypothesis assumes different measured values of quality of life for men and women. The measurement yielded knowledge of the high value of quality of place and environmental quality, which can enrich the quality of life epistemology on the one hand and geographical psychology on the other. Trust, health, happiness, quality of place, and safety were identified as factors. The measurement revealed the finding of different quality of life values in the third and first wave of the pandemic. While quality of life values increased in the first wave compared to the pre-pandemic period, both quality of life values and factors decreased in the third wave compared to the first wave. The only exception was one factor that we consider to be a winner of the third wave of the pandemic. The factor that declined in all measurements is considered to be the loser of the third wave of the pandemic. The paper concludes with implications derived from these findings.

摘要

本文聚焦于疫情的第三波,并就捷克大学生的生活质量将其与第一波疫情进行比较。在第一波疫情中,社会团结一心,团结是一个突出表现。第三波疫情在医学方面(已有疫苗可用)以及社会方面与第一波不同。本文有两个目标,第一个是衡量疫情第三波期间的生活质量及相关变量,并将第三波中得到的值与疫情第一波中的值进行比较。第二个目标是确定哪些与生活质量相关的因素是该质量的预测指标。该假设认为男性和女性的生活质量测量值不同。测量得出了对场所质量和环境质量高价值的认识,这一方面可以丰富生活质量认识论,另一方面可以丰富地理心理学。信任、健康、幸福、场所质量和安全被确定为因素。测量揭示了疫情第三波和第一波中生活质量值的不同。与疫情前时期相比,第一波疫情中的生活质量值有所提高,而与第一波相比,第三波疫情中的生活质量值和因素都有所下降。唯一的例外是一个我们认为是疫情第三波赢家的因素。在所有测量中下降的因素被认为是疫情第三波的输家。本文最后得出了这些发现所产生的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36cf/10881370/1b5b814414d4/gr1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索