优化策略以提高美国艾滋病毒感染风险青少年人群对艾滋病毒预防的接受度和依从性(ATN 149):一项随机对照、析因试验。
Optimal strategies to improve uptake of and adherence to HIV prevention among young people at risk for HIV acquisition in the USA (ATN 149): a randomised, controlled, factorial trial.
机构信息
Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
出版信息
Lancet Digit Health. 2024 Mar;6(3):e187-e200. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00252-2.
BACKGROUND
Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP), condom use, post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), and sexual partner reduction help to prevent HIV acquisition but have low uptake among young people. We aimed to assess the efficacy of automated text messaging and monitoring, online peer support, and strengths-based telehealth coaching to improve uptake of and adherence to PrEP, condom use, and PEP among adolescents aged 12-24 years at risk of HIV acquisition in Los Angeles, CA, USA, and New Orleans, LA, USA.
METHODS
We conducted a four-arm randomised controlled factorial trial, assessing interventions designed to support uptake and adherence of HIV prevention options (ie, PrEP, PEP, condom use, and sexual partner reduction). We recruited young people aged 12-24 years who were at risk of HIV acquisition from 13 community-based organisations, adolescent medicine clinics, and organisations serving people who are unstably housed, people who were previously incarcerated, and other vulnerable young people, and through dating apps, peer referrals, and social venues and events in Los Angeles, CA, USA, and New Orleans, LA, USA. Young people who tested seronegative and reported being gay, bisexual, or other men who have sex with men, transgender men or women, or gender diverse (eg. non-binary or genderqueer) were eligible for inclusion. Participants were randomly assigned to one of four intervention groups in a factorial design: automated text messaging and monitoring (AMMI) only, AMMI plus peer support via private social media, AMMI plus strengths-based telehealth coaching by near-peer paraprofessionals, or AMMI plus peer support and coaching. Assignment was further stratified by race or ethnicity and sexual orientation within each interviewer's group of participants. Participants were masked to intervention assignment until after baseline interviews when offered their randomly assigned intervention, and interviewers were masked throughout the study. Interventions were available throughout the 24-month follow-up period, and participants completed baseline and follow-up assessments, including rapid diagnostic tests for sexually transmitted infections, HIV, and substance use, at 4-month intervals over 24 months. The primary outcomes were uptake and adherence to HIV prevention options over 24 months, measured by self-reported PrEP use and adherence, consistent condom use with all partners, PEP prescription and adherence, and number of sexual partners in participants with at least one follow-up. We used Bayesian generalised linear modelling to assess changes in outcomes over time comparing the four study groups. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03134833) and is completed.
FINDINGS
We screened 2314 adolescents beginning May 1, 2017, to enrol 1037 participants (45%) aged 16-24 years between May 6, 2017, and Aug 30, 2019, of whom 895 (86%) had follow-up assessments and were included in the analytical sample (313 assigned to AMMI only, 205 assigned to AMMI plus peer support, 196 assigned to AMMI plus coaching, and 181 assigned to AMMI plus peer support and coaching). Follow-up was completed on Nov 8, 2021. Participants were diverse in race and ethnicity (362 [40%] Black or African American, 257 [29%] Latinx or Hispanic, 184 [21%] White, and 53 [6%] Asian or Pacific Islander) and other sociodemographic factors. At baseline, 591 (66%) participants reported anal sex without a condom in the past 12 months. PrEP use matched that in young people nationally, with 101 (11%) participants reporting current PrEP use at baseline, increasing at 4 months to 132 (15%) and continuing to increase in the AMMI plus peer support and coaching group (odds ratio 2·31, 95% CI 1·28-4·14 vs AMMI control). There was no evidence for intervention effect on condom use, PEP use (ie, prescription or adherence), PrEP adherence, or sexual partner numbers. No unanticipated or study-related adverse events occurred.
INTERPRETATION
Results are consistent with hypothesised synergistic intervention effects of evidence-based functions of informational, motivational, and reminder messaging; peer support for HIV prevention; and strengths-based, goal-focused, and problem-solving telehealth coaching delivered by near-peer paraprofessionals. These core functions could be flexibly scaled via combinations of technology platforms and front-line or telehealth HIV prevention workers.
FUNDING
Adolescent Medicine Trials Network for HIV/AIDS Interventions, US National Institutes of Health.
背景
暴露前预防(PrEP)、 condom 使用、暴露后预防(PEP)和性伴侣减少有助于预防 HIV 感染,但在年轻人中的使用率较低。我们旨在评估自动化短信和监测、在线同伴支持以及基于优势的远程健康指导,以改善在美国加利福尼亚州洛杉矶和路易斯安那州新奥尔良,12-24 岁有 HIV 感染风险的青少年获取和坚持使用 PrEP、 condom 使用和 PEP 的情况。
方法
我们进行了一项四臂随机对照析因试验,评估了旨在支持 HIV 预防选择(即 PrEP、PEP、 condom 使用和性伴侣减少)获取和坚持的干预措施。我们从 13 个社区组织、青少年医学诊所以及为不稳定住房者、以前被监禁者和其他弱势年轻人提供服务的组织,以及通过约会应用程序、同伴推荐和社交场所和活动,招募了有 HIV 感染风险的 12-24 岁的年轻人。测试结果为血清阴性且报告为同性恋、双性恋或其他与男性发生性关系的男性、跨性别男性或女性或性别多样化(例如非二元性别或性别酷儿)的人有资格入组。参与者被随机分配到四组干预措施中的一组:仅自动化短信和监测(AMMI)、AMMI 加通过私人社交媒体的同伴支持、AMMI 加由近专业人士提供的基于优势的远程健康指导或 AMMI 加同伴支持和指导。在每个访谈者的参与者小组中,按种族或族裔和性取向进一步分层分配。参与者在基线访谈时对干预措施分配情况保持不知情,直到提供他们随机分配的干预措施,访谈者在整个研究过程中保持不知情。干预措施在 24 个月的随访期间持续提供,参与者在 24 个月内每 4 个月完成一次包括性传播感染、HIV 和物质使用的快速诊断检测以及基线和随访评估。主要结局是在 24 个月内 HIV 预防选择的获取和坚持情况,通过自我报告的 PrEP 使用和坚持、与所有伴侣一致使用 condom、PEP 处方和坚持以及在至少有一次随访的参与者中的性伴侣数量来衡量。我们使用贝叶斯广义线性模型来评估比较四组研究组的结果随时间的变化。这项研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03134833)注册,并已完成。
结果
我们从 2017 年 5 月 1 日开始筛选了 2314 名青少年,以招募 1037 名 16-24 岁的参与者(45%),这些参与者于 2017 年 5 月 6 日至 2019 年 8 月 30 日之间入组,其中 895 名(86%)有随访评估并被纳入分析样本(313 名分配到 AMMI 组,205 名分配到 AMMI 加同伴支持组,196 名分配到 AMMI 加指导组,181 名分配到 AMMI 加同伴支持和指导组)。随访于 2021 年 11 月 8 日完成。参与者在种族和族裔(362 名[40%]黑人或非裔美国人、257 名[29%]拉丁裔或西班牙裔、184 名[21%]白人、53 名[6%]亚洲或太平洋岛民)和其他社会人口因素方面存在差异。基线时,591 名(66%)参与者报告在过去 12 个月内有无 condom 的肛交。PrEP 的使用与全国年轻人的使用情况一致,101 名(11%)参与者报告在基线时正在使用 PrEP,在 4 个月时增加到 132 名(15%),并在 AMMI 加同伴支持和指导组中继续增加(比值比 2.31,95%CI 1.28-4.14 与 AMMI 对照组)。没有证据表明干预措施对 condom 使用、PEP 使用(即处方或坚持)、PrEP 坚持或性伴侣数量有影响。没有意外或与研究相关的不良事件发生。
解释
结果与假设的基于优势的远程健康指导的协同干预效果一致,这些效果包括基于证据的信息、动机和提醒消息传递功能、HIV 预防同伴支持以及由近专业人士提供的基于优势的、目标导向的和解决问题的远程健康指导。这些核心功能可以通过技术平台和一线或远程 HIV 预防工作者的组合进行灵活扩展。
资金
青少年医学试验网络艾滋病干预措施,美国国立卫生研究院。