本体感觉系统在全身振动对年轻人运动表现的急性影响中的整合功能。

Integrative function of proprioceptive system in the acute effects of whole body vibration on the movement performance in young adults.

作者信息

Maslova Olga, Shusharina Natalia, Videnin Arseniy, Pyatin Vasiliy

机构信息

Neurosociology Laboratory, Neurosciences Research Institute, Samara State Medical University, Samara, Russia.

Baltic Center for Neurotechnologies and Artificial Intelligence, Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University, Kaliningrad, Russia.

出版信息

Front Sports Act Living. 2024 Apr 9;6:1357199. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2024.1357199. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The proprioceptive system coordinates locomotion, but its role in short-term integration and recovery of motor activity in imbalance of motor patterns and body remains debated. The aim of this study is investigating the functional role of proprioceptive system in motor patterns and body balance in healthy young adults.

METHODS

70 participants (aged 20.1 ± 0.3) were divided into experimental groups EG1 ( = 30), EG2 ( = 30), control group (CG,  = 10). EG1 performed single WBV session on Power Plate (7 exercises adapted to Functional Movement Screen (FMS). EG2 performed single session of FMS Exercises (FMSE). CG didn't perform any physical activity. All participants performed pre- and post-session of FMS and stabilometric measurements.

RESULTS

FMS total score in EG1 increased by 2.0 ± 0.2 (< 0.001), this was significantly differed (< 0.001) from EG2 and CG. Acute effects of WBV and FMSE on rate of change and standard deviation (SD) of pressure center (COP) were shown in all groups during Static Test (< 0.01). SD increased (< 0.01) in Given Setting Test in EG1 and EG2, and in Romberg Test (< 0.001) in EG1. Length, width and area (< 0.01) of confidence ellipse, containing 95% of the statokinesiogram points, decreased in Static Test in EG1; width and area (< 0.01) decreased in EG2 group. Significant (< 0.01) decrease in Given Setting Test was in EG1, and significant (< 0.01) increase was in Romberg Test (open eyes) in CG. Maximum amplitude of COP oscillations: significantly (< 0.01) decreasing along and axes in EG1 and EG2, and along axis in CG during Static Test; along axis (< 0.01) in all groups during Given Setting Test. Significant differences were identified (< 0.01) in calculated energy consumption for COP moving during all stabilometric tests. However, inter-group differences in COP after acute WBV and FMSE sessions have not been identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute WBV session eliminates the deficits in motor patterns which is not the case after acute FMSE session, which, according to our integrative movement tuning hypothesis, is due to high activation of integrative function of proprioceptive system. Efficacy of WBV and FMSE on COP performance indicates a high sensitivity of postural control to different levels of proprioceptive system activity.

摘要

背景

本体感觉系统协调运动,但在运动模式和身体失衡时其在运动活动的短期整合和恢复中的作用仍存在争议。本研究的目的是调查本体感觉系统在健康年轻成年人的运动模式和身体平衡中的功能作用。

方法

70名参与者(年龄20.1±0.3岁)被分为实验组EG1(n = 30)、EG2(n = 30)和对照组(CG,n = 10)。EG1在振动训练平台上进行单次全身振动训练(7项适应功能性动作筛查(FMS)的练习)。EG2进行单次FMS练习(FMSE)。CG不进行任何体育活动。所有参与者在训练前后均进行FMS和稳定测量。

结果

EG1的FMS总分增加了2.0±0.2(<0.001),与EG2和CG相比有显著差异(<0.001)。在静态测试期间,所有组均显示全身振动训练和FMSE对压力中心(COP)变化率和标准差(SD)的急性影响(<0.01)。在特定设置测试中,EG1和EG2的SD增加(<0.01),在EG1的罗姆伯格测试中SD增加(<0.001)。在静态测试中,EG1中包含95%姿势运动图点的置信椭圆的长度、宽度和面积减小(<0.01);EG2组的宽度和面积减小(<0.01)。在特定设置测试中,EG1有显著(<0.)1)降低,在CG的罗姆伯格测试(睁眼)中有显著(<0.01)增加。COP振荡的最大幅度:在静态测试期间,EG1和EG2沿x和y轴显著(<0.01)减小,CG沿y轴显著(<0.01)减小;在特定设置测试期间,所有组沿x轴显著(<0.01)减小。在所有稳定测量测试中,计算出的COP移动能量消耗存在显著差异(<0.01)。然而,在急性全身振动训练和FMSE训练后,未发现组间COP差异。

结论

急性全身振动训练消除了运动模式中的缺陷,而急性FMSE训练后则不然,根据我们的综合运动调整假设,这是由于本体感觉系统整合功能的高度激活。全身振动训练和FMSE对COP表现的有效性表明姿势控制对本体感觉系统不同活动水平具有高度敏感性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1567/11035735/50d56f818480/fspor-06-1357199-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索