• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内镜超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术在实性胰腺病变诊断中具有较高诊断价值。

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration has High Diagnostic Value in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions.

作者信息

Chen Yuan, Chen Yanping, Chen Xiao, Zhai XiaoLi, Zhu Fang, Ye Xiaohua, Ding Jin

出版信息

Altern Ther Health Med. 2025 Sep;31(5):141-145.

PMID:38836726
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the potential factors influencing the diagnostic capability of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and provide medication treatment recommendations for patients with pancreatic solid mass lesions.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical data of 92 patients with pancreatic solid mass lesions who underwent EUS-FNA examination after detection by imaging studies. The diagnostic effectiveness of EUS-FNA was evaluated based on cytological or histological examination results. Logistic regression analysis was subsequently performed to analyze the potential factors influencing the diagnostic capability of EUS-FNA in patients with pancreatic solid mass lesions.

RESULTS

EUS-FNA was successfully performed in all 92 patients, with a puncture success rate of 100.00%. Only one patient experienced transient hyperamylasemia, which resolved with conservative treatment. No other serious complications were observed. Among the 92 patients, 70 patients obtained a definite diagnosis after EUS-FNA (Group A), while 22 patients did not achieve a definite diagnosis (Group B) after the procedure. Univariate analysis showed that lesion size, dilation of the pancreatic duct or bile duct, negative pressure, and suction method were significantly different between Group A and Group B (P < .05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that lesion size, dilation of the pancreatic duct or bile duct, negative pressure, and suction method were potential factors influencing the diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA in patients with solid pancreatic lesions (P < .05).

CONCLUSION

EUS-FNA has a high diagnostic value in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions. Lesion size, dilation of the pancreatic duct or bile duct, negative pressure, and suction method are potential factors influencing the diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA in patients with solid pancreatic lesions. In terms of medical treatment, specific treatment methods and drug choices should be based on a comprehensive evaluation of the nature of the patient's lesions and the severity of the condition.

摘要

目的

分析影响超声内镜引导下细针穿刺抽吸术(EUS-FNA)诊断能力的潜在因素,并为胰腺实性肿块病变患者提供药物治疗建议。

方法

对92例经影像学检查发现胰腺实性肿块病变后接受EUS-FNA检查的患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析。根据细胞学或组织学检查结果评估EUS-FNA的诊断有效性。随后进行Logistic回归分析,以分析影响胰腺实性肿块病变患者EUS-FNA诊断能力的潜在因素。

结果

92例患者均成功进行了EUS-FNA,穿刺成功率为100.00%。仅1例患者出现短暂性高淀粉酶血症,经保守治疗后缓解。未观察到其他严重并发症。92例患者中,70例在EUS-FNA后获得明确诊断(A组),而22例患者在术后未获得明确诊断(B组)。单因素分析显示,A组和B组在病变大小、胰管或胆管扩张、负压和抽吸方法方面存在显著差异(P < .05)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,病变大小、胰管或胆管扩张、负压和抽吸方法是影响胰腺实性病变患者EUS-FNA诊断能力的潜在因素(P < .05)。

结论

EUS-FNA在评估胰腺实性病变方面具有较高的诊断价值。病变大小、胰管或胆管扩张、负压和抽吸方法是影响胰腺实性病变患者EUS-FNA诊断能力的潜在因素。在药物治疗方面,具体的治疗方法和药物选择应基于对患者病变性质和病情严重程度的综合评估。

相似文献

1
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration has High Diagnostic Value in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Lesions.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术在实性胰腺病变诊断中具有较高诊断价值。
Altern Ther Health Med. 2025 Sep;31(5):141-145.
2
Imaging modalities for characterising focal pancreatic lesions.用于表征胰腺局灶性病变的成像方式。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 17;4(4):CD010213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010213.pub2.
3
High Diagnostic Yield of Fine Needle Biopsy for Pancreatic Serous Cystadenomas-A Multicenter Study.胰腺浆液性囊腺瘤细针穿刺活检的高诊断率——一项多中心研究
Pancreas. 2025 Apr 1;54(4):e349-e352. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000002442.
4
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Tissue Acquisition of Pancreatic Malignancy: A Retrospective Study at a Tertiary Center.内镜超声引导下胰腺恶性肿瘤组织获取:一项三级中心的回顾性研究
Rom J Intern Med. 2025 Apr 22;63(2):175-184. doi: 10.2478/rjim-2025-0008. eCollection 2025 Jun 1.
5
Diagnostic Value of Ultrasound Endoscopy-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Peritoneal Lesions.超声内镜引导下细针穿刺对腹膜病变的诊断价值
Altern Ther Health Med. 2025 Sep;31(5):136-140.
6
How good is endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in diagnosing the correct etiology for a solid pancreatic mass?: A meta-analysis and systematic review.内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术诊断实性胰腺肿块的正确病因的效果如何?:一项荟萃分析和系统评价。
Pancreas. 2013 Jan;42(1):20-6. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182546e79.
7
Diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound for detection of pancreatic malignancy following an indeterminate multidetector CT scan: a systemic review and meta-analysis.内镜超声检查对多排螺旋 CT 扫描结果不确定的胰腺恶性肿瘤的诊断性能:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Nov;31(11):4558-4567. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5516-y. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
8
EUS FNAC without rapid on-site evaluation is comparable to EUS FNB with macroscopic on-site evaluation in evaluation of intra-abdominal masses.在评估腹腔内肿块时,未进行快速现场评估的超声内镜细针穿刺抽吸活检(EUS FNAC)与进行宏观现场评估的超声内镜细针活检(EUS FNB)效果相当。
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2025 Feb 19. doi: 10.1007/s12664-025-01741-3.
9
Optimal Number of Needle Punctures in EUS-FNA/B with ROSE for Solid Pancreatic Lesions.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸/活检联合现场快速评估用于实性胰腺病变时的最佳穿刺针数
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jul 2;15(13):1692. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15131692.
10
Assessment of morbidity and mortality associated with endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cystic lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.评估内镜超声引导下细针抽吸术治疗胰腺囊性病变的发病率和死亡率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Endosc. 2017 Sep;29(6):667-675. doi: 10.1111/den.12851. Epub 2017 Jun 6.