Suppr超能文献

论个体、群体与因果机制 对伦德(2023年)的一些批判性思考

On Persons, Populations, and Causal Mechanisms Some Critical Reflections on Lundh (2023).

作者信息

Lamiell James T

机构信息

Psychology Department, Georgetown University, Washington D.C., USA.

出版信息

J Pers Oriented Res. 2024 May 23;10(1):61-63. doi: 10.17505/jpor.2024.26272. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

While agreeing with Lundh (2023) on many of his major points, this article also questions the notion of a 'population psychology.' It is argued that the knowledge produced in population-level studies, whether correlational, experimental, or mixed, is inherently demographic in nature. Concerning individual-level studies, agreement with Lundh (2023) is expressed concerning the need to distinguish between a conception of individuals as mere depositories of neurophysiological mechanisms on the one hand, and as active, purposeful agents on the other. It is suggested that the conceptual framework called 'critical personalism' would well serve a scientific psychology committed to the latter view.

摘要

在许多主要观点上与伦德(2023年)达成一致的同时,本文也对“群体心理学”的概念提出了质疑。有人认为,在群体层面研究中产生的知识,无论是相关性研究、实验性研究还是混合性研究,本质上都是人口统计学性质的。关于个体层面的研究,本文赞同伦德(2023年)的观点,即有必要区分一方面将个体视为神经生理机制的单纯储存库,另一方面将个体视为积极、有目的的主体。有人建议,名为“批判人格主义”的概念框架将很好地服务于致力于后一种观点的科学心理学。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验