• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在德国使用电子健康记录对医院脆弱风险评分进行重新加权和验证:一项回顾性观察研究。

Reweighting and validation of the hospital frailty risk score using electronic health records in Germany: a retrospective observational study.

作者信息

Kaier Klaus, Heidenreich Adrian, Jäckel Markus, Oettinger Vera, Maier Alexander, Hilgendorf Ingo, Breitbart Philipp, Hartikainen Tau, Keller Till, Westermann Dirk, von Zur Mühlen Constantin

机构信息

Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 49, Freiburg, 79106, Germany.

Centre for Big Data Analysis in Cardiology (CeBAC), Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05107-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05107-w
PMID:38872086
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11177354/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In the hospital setting, frailty is a significant risk factor, but difficult to measure in clinical practice. We propose a reweighting of an existing diagnoses-based frailty score using routine data from a tertiary care teaching hospital in southern Germany.

METHODS

The dataset includes patient characteristics such as sex, age, primary and secondary diagnoses and in-hospital mortality. Based on this information, we recalculate the existing Hospital Frailty Risk Score. The cohort includes patients aged ≥ 75 and was divided into a development cohort (admission year 2011 to 2013, N = 30,525) and a validation cohort (2014, N = 11,202). A limited external validation is also conducted in a second validation cohort containing inpatient cases aged ≥ 75 in 2022 throughout Germany (N = 491,251). In the development cohort, LASSO regression analysis was used to select the most relevant variables and to generate a reweighted Frailty Score for the German setting. Discrimination is assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Visualization of calibration curves and decision curve analysis were carried out. Applicability of the reweighted Frailty Score in a non-elderly population was assessed using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

Reweighting of the Frailty Score included only 53 out of the 109 frailty-related diagnoses and resulted in substantially better discrimination than the initial weighting of the score (AUC = 0.89 vs. AUC = 0.80, p < 0.001 in the validation cohort). Calibration curves show a good agreement between score-based predictions and actual observed mortality. Additional external validation using inpatient cases aged ≥ 75 in 2022 throughout Germany (N = 491,251) confirms the results regarding discrimination and calibration and underlines the geographic and temporal validity of the reweighted Frailty Score. Decision curve analysis indicates that the clinical usefulness of the reweighted score as a general decision support tool is superior to the initial version of the score. Assessment of the applicability of the reweighted Frailty Score in a non-elderly population (N = 198,819) shows that discrimination is superior to the initial version of the score (AUC = 0.92 vs. AUC = 0.87, p < 0.001). In addition, we observe a fairly age-stable influence of the reweighted Frailty Score on in-hospital mortality, which does not differ substantially for women and men.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data indicate that the reweighted Frailty Score is superior to the original Frailty Score for identification of older, frail patients at risk for in-hospital mortality. Hence, we recommend using the reweighted Frailty Score in the German in-hospital setting.

摘要

背景

在医院环境中,虚弱是一个重要的风险因素,但在临床实践中难以测量。我们建议使用德国南部一家三级护理教学医院的常规数据对现有的基于诊断的虚弱评分进行重新加权。

方法

数据集包括患者特征,如性别、年龄、主要和次要诊断以及住院死亡率。基于这些信息,我们重新计算现有的医院虚弱风险评分。该队列包括年龄≥75岁的患者,并分为一个开发队列(2011年至2013年入院,N = 30525)和一个验证队列(2014年,N = 11202)。还在第二个验证队列中进行了有限的外部验证,该队列包含2022年德国各地年龄≥75岁的住院病例(N = 491251)。在开发队列中,使用LASSO回归分析来选择最相关的变量,并生成针对德国情况的重新加权虚弱评分。使用受试者操作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积评估辨别力。进行校准曲线的可视化和决策曲线分析。使用逻辑回归模型评估重新加权虚弱评分在非老年人群中的适用性。

结果

虚弱评分的重新加权仅包括109个与虚弱相关诊断中的53个,并且在辨别力方面比评分的初始加权有显著改善(验证队列中AUC = 0.89 vs. AUC = 0.80,p < 0.001)。校准曲线显示基于评分的预测与实际观察到的死亡率之间有良好的一致性。使用2022年德国各地年龄≥75岁的住院病例(N = 491251)进行的额外外部验证证实了关于辨别力和校准的结果,并强调了重新加权虚弱评分的地理和时间有效性。决策曲线分析表明,重新加权评分作为一般决策支持工具的临床实用性优于评分的初始版本。对重新加权虚弱评分在非老年人群(N = 198819)中的适用性评估表明,辨别力优于评分的初始版本(AUC = 0.92 vs. AUC = 0.87,p < 0.001)。此外,我们观察到重新加权虚弱评分对住院死亡率的影响在年龄上相当稳定,男女之间没有实质性差异。

结论

我们的数据表明,重新加权的虚弱评分在识别有住院死亡风险的老年虚弱患者方面优于原始虚弱评分。因此,我们建议在德国医院环境中使用重新加权的虚弱评分。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9525/11177354/f23809bb0acb/12877_2024_5107_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9525/11177354/3f9caf7446b3/12877_2024_5107_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9525/11177354/b0dfe4a6e300/12877_2024_5107_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9525/11177354/a377d4780d91/12877_2024_5107_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9525/11177354/f23809bb0acb/12877_2024_5107_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9525/11177354/3f9caf7446b3/12877_2024_5107_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9525/11177354/b0dfe4a6e300/12877_2024_5107_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9525/11177354/a377d4780d91/12877_2024_5107_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9525/11177354/f23809bb0acb/12877_2024_5107_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Reweighting and validation of the hospital frailty risk score using electronic health records in Germany: a retrospective observational study.在德国使用电子健康记录对医院脆弱风险评分进行重新加权和验证:一项回顾性观察研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):517. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05107-w.
2
Development and validation of an electronic frailty index using routine primary care electronic health record data.利用常规基层医疗电子健康记录数据开发并验证电子衰弱指数
Age Ageing. 2016 May;45(3):353-60. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw039. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
3
Inclusion of frailty improved performance of delirium prediction for elderly patients in the cardiac intensive care unit (D-FRAIL): A prospective derivation and external validation study.纳入衰弱因素可改善心脏重症监护病房老年患者谵妄预测模型的性能(D-FRAIL):一项前瞻性推导和外部验证研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2023 Nov;147:104582. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104582. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
4
Preoperative Modified Frailty Index-11 versus EuroSCORE II in Predicting Postoperative Mortality and Complications in Elderly Patients Who Underwent Elective Open Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.术前改良衰弱指数-11 与欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统 II 对择期开胸心脏手术老年患者术后死亡率和并发症的预测作用比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024 Nov;38(11):2613-2623. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.08.018. Epub 2024 Aug 17.
5
Development and validation of a Hospital Frailty Risk Score focusing on older people in acute care settings using electronic hospital records: an observational study.开发和验证一个专注于急性护理环境中老年人的医院衰弱风险评分,使用电子医院记录:一项观察性研究。
Lancet. 2018 May 5;391(10132):1775-1782. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30668-8. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
6
Validation of an electronic frailty index with electronic health records: eFRAGICAP index.基于电子健康记录的电子衰弱指数验证:eFRAGICAP 指数。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 May 7;22(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-03090-8.
7
External validation of the hospital frailty risk score among hospitalised home care clients in Canada: a retrospective cohort study.加拿大住院家庭护理患者的医院衰弱风险评分的外部验证:一项回顾性队列研究。
Age Ageing. 2023 Feb 1;52(2). doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac334.
8
Can routine preoperative data predict adverse outcomes in the elderly? Development and validation of a simple risk model incorporating a chart-derived frailty score.常规术前数据能否预测老年人的不良结局?一种包含图表衍生的虚弱评分的简单风险模型的开发和验证。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Oct;219(4):684-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.04.018. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
9
Adaptation of the Risk Analysis Index for Frailty Assessment Using Diagnostic Codes.使用诊断代码对虚弱评估的风险分析指数进行调整。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 May 1;7(5):e2413166. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.13166.
10
Frailty assessed by administrative tools and mortality in patients with pneumonia admitted to the hospital and ICU in Wales.威尔士因肺炎住院和入住 ICU 的患者采用行政工具评估虚弱度与死亡率。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 28;11(1):13407. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92874-w.

引用本文的文献

1
A retrospective cohort study on the relationship between frailty and healthcare outcomes.一项关于衰弱与医疗保健结果之间关系的回顾性队列研究。
J Frailty Aging. 2025 May 23;14(4):100053. doi: 10.1016/j.tjfa.2025.100053.
2
The Current Status of Frailty and Influencing Factors in Elderly Patients With Hip Fractures: A Meta-Analysis.老年髋部骨折患者衰弱的现状及影响因素:一项Meta分析
Biomed Res Int. 2025 Apr 13;2025:7756605. doi: 10.1155/bmri/7756605. eCollection 2025.
3
A Systematic Comparison of Age, Comorbidity and Frailty of Two Defined ICU Populations in the German Helios Hospital Group from 2016-2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Catheter based left atrial appendage closure in-hospital outcomes in Germany from 2016 to 2020.2016 年至 2020 年德国基于导管的左心耳封堵术住院治疗结果。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2024 Oct;113(10):1419-1429. doi: 10.1007/s00392-023-02299-w. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
2
Evolving trends in the surgical therapy of patients with endometrial cancer in Germany: analysis of a nationwide registry with special emphasis on perioperative outcomes.德国子宫内膜癌患者手术治疗的演变趋势:全国注册登记研究分析,重点关注围手术期结局。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Nov;308(5):1635-1640. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07127-0. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
3
Cerebral aneurysms: Germany-wide real-world outcome data of endovascular or neurosurgical treatment from 2007 to 2019.
2016年至2021年德国赫利俄斯医院集团两个特定ICU人群的年龄、合并症和虚弱状况的系统比较
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 28;14(7):2332. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072332.
4
Development and indirect validation of a model predicting frailty in the French healthcare claims database.法国医疗保健理赔数据库中预测衰弱模型的开发与间接验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 2;15(1):11344. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-95629-z.
颅内动脉瘤:2007 年至 2019 年德国范围内的血管内或神经外科治疗的真实世界结局数据。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Mar 14;16(4):365-371. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020181.
4
Validation of hospital frailty risk score to predict hospital use in older people: Evidence from the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health.验证医院衰弱风险评分预测老年人住院的效果:来自澳大利亚女性健康纵向研究的证据。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2021 Jan-Feb;92:104282. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104282. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
5
Measuring Frailty in Health Care Databases for Clinical Care and Research.在医疗保健数据库中测量衰弱以用于临床护理和研究。
Ann Geriatr Med Res. 2020 Jun;24(2):62-74. doi: 10.4235/agmr.20.0002. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
6
Hospital costs associated with post-traumatic stress disorder in somatic patients: a retrospective study.躯体疾病患者创伤后应激障碍相关的医院费用:一项回顾性研究。
Health Econ Rev. 2020 Jul 11;10(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13561-020-00281-0.
7
Utility of the Hospital Frailty Risk Score for Predicting Adverse Outcomes in Degenerative Spine Surgery Cohorts.医院虚弱风险评分在预测退行性脊柱手术队列不良结局中的效用。
Neurosurgery. 2020 Nov 16;87(6):1223-1230. doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa248.
8
The Hospital Frailty Risk Score and its association with in-hospital mortality, cost, length of stay and discharge location in patients with heart failure short running title: Frailty and outcomes in heart failure.医院衰弱风险评分及其与心力衰竭患者住院死亡率、成本、住院时间和出院地点的关系 短标题:衰弱与心力衰竭的结局。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Feb 1;300:184-190. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.09.064. Epub 2019 Oct 9.
9
The hospital frailty risk score in patients with heart failure is strongly associated with outcomes but less so with pharmacotherapy.心力衰竭患者的医院衰弱风险评分与结局密切相关,但与药物治疗的关系则不那么密切。
J Intern Med. 2020 Mar;287(3):322-332. doi: 10.1111/joim.13002. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
10
Relation of Frailty to Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes.虚弱与急性冠状动脉综合征患者结局的关系。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Oct 1;124(7):1002-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.07.003. Epub 2019 Jul 26.