重大创伤分诊工具研究(MATTS):基于专家共识得出的损伤评估工具。
Major Trauma Triage Tool Study (MATTS) expert consensus-derived injury assessment tool.
作者信息
Fuller Gordon, Howes Nathan, Mackenzie Roderick, Keating Samuel, Turner Janette, Holt Chris, Miller Joshua, Goodacre Steve
机构信息
University of Sheffield ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8532-3500.
Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust; Magpas Air Ambulance ORCID iD: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7117-7045.
出版信息
Br Paramed J. 2024 Jun 1;9(1):10-22. doi: 10.29045/14784726.2024.6.9.1.10.
INTRODUCTION
Major trauma centre (MTC) care has been associated with improved outcomes for injured patients. English ambulance services and trauma networks currently use a range of triage tools to select patients for bypass to MTCs. A standardised national triage tool may improve triage accuracy, cost-effectiveness and the reproducibility of decision-making.
METHODS
We conducted an expert consensus process to derive and develop a major trauma triage tool for use in English trauma networks. A web-based Delphi survey was conducted to identify and confirm candidate triage tool predictors of major trauma. Facilitated roundtable consensus meetings were convened to confirm the proposed triage tool's purpose, target diagnostic threshold, scope, intended population and structure, as well as the individual triage tool predictors and cut points. Public and patient involvement (PPI) focus groups were held to ensure triage tool acceptability to service users.
RESULTS
The Delphi survey reached consensus on nine triage variables in two domains, from 109 candidate variables after three rounds. Following a review of the relevant evidence during the consensus meetings, iterative rounds of discussion achieved consensus on the following aspects of the triage tool: reference standard, scope, target diagnostic accuracy and intended population. A three-step tool comprising physiology, anatomical injury and clinical judgement domains, with triage variables assessed in parallel, was recommended. The triage tool was received favourably by PPI focus groups.
CONCLUSIONS
This paper presents a new expert consensus derived major trauma triage tool with defined purpose, scope, intended population, structure, constituent variables, variable definitions and thresholds. Prospective evaluation is required to determine clinical and cost-effectiveness, acceptability and usability.
引言
大型创伤中心(MTC)的护理与受伤患者改善的预后相关。英国的救护车服务和创伤网络目前使用一系列分诊工具来挑选患者以绕过MTC。标准化的国家分诊工具可能会提高分诊准确性、成本效益以及决策的可重复性。
方法
我们开展了一个专家共识过程,以推导和开发一种用于英国创伤网络的主要创伤分诊工具。进行了一项基于网络的德尔菲调查,以识别和确认主要创伤的候选分诊工具预测指标。召开了促进性圆桌共识会议,以确认拟议的分诊工具的目的、目标诊断阈值、范围、目标人群和结构,以及各个分诊工具预测指标和切点。举行了公众和患者参与(PPI)焦点小组会议,以确保服务使用者对分诊工具的接受度。
结果
经过三轮,德尔菲调查在两个领域的九个分诊变量上达成了共识,这九个变量来自109个候选变量。在共识会议期间对相关证据进行审查后,经过多轮讨论,在分诊工具的以下方面达成了共识:参考标准、范围、目标诊断准确性和目标人群。推荐了一种由生理、解剖损伤和临床判断领域组成的三步工具,分诊变量并行评估。PPI焦点小组对分诊工具的评价良好。
结论
本文提出了一种新的基于专家共识得出的主要创伤分诊工具,其具有明确的目的、范围、目标人群、结构、构成变量、变量定义和阈值。需要进行前瞻性评估以确定临床和成本效益、可接受性和可用性。