• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

膝关节骨关节炎患者单髁置换与全膝关节置换的长期疗效比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Comparative long-term outcomes of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty in knee osteoarthritis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Hu Hai, Li Pengfei, Liu Zelin, Lv Hang, Yang Xiangjun, Liu Peiran

机构信息

Department of Bone Injuries, Hanan Branch of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.

Department of Medical Services Division, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Heilongjiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Harbin, China.

出版信息

Front Surg. 2024 Aug 21;11:1405025. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1405025. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2024.1405025
PMID:39233767
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11371575/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Long-term outcomes for knee osteoarthritis patients undergoing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remain inconclusive.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the long-term outcomes over five years, including Knee Society Pain Scores (KSPS), Knee Society Scores (KSS), Knee Society Function Scores (KSFS), range of motion (ROM), and survival rates-of UKA vs. TKA in knee osteoarthritis patients.

DESIGN

Systematic review using data from randomized controlled and cohort trials, and world databases.

DATA SOURCES

Researchers searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 1990 to March 2024.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

The researchers selected studies based on adult participants with knee osteoarthritis. Eligible studies compare UKA and TKA reports on clinical or surgical outcomes, including KSPS, KSS, KSFS, ROM and survival rates, over 5 years. The researchers excluded the studies fewer than five years, or if English text was unavailable.

RESULTS

Researchers categorized twenty-nine eligible studies into three groups: five randomized controlled trials, 11 registries and database studies, and 13 cohort studies. The analysis revealed that neither TKA nor UKA definitively outperformed the other in terms of pain (SMD (95% CI): -0.06 [-0.41, 0.28], = 90%) and KSS scores (SMD (95% CI): -0.07 [-0.23, 0.008], = 81%) over a period of five years. However, KSFS (SMD (95% CI): -0.30 [-0.43, -0.17],  = 74%) and ROM (SMD (95% CI): -0.78 [-1.11, -0.46],  = 92%) tended to favor UKA, and survival rate favor TKA at 5 or over 5-year follow-up periods.

CONCLUSIONS

UKA shows a trend towards better outcomes in KSFS and ROM, alongside a more favorable survival rate in TKA at the five-year and beyond follow-up periods.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=517835, PROSPERO (CRD42024517835).

摘要

背景

接受单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)和全膝关节置换术(TKA)的膝关节骨关节炎患者的长期预后尚无定论。

目的

本研究旨在评估膝关节骨关节炎患者UKA与TKA在五年以上的长期预后,包括膝关节协会疼痛评分(KSPS)、膝关节协会评分(KSS)、膝关节协会功能评分(KSFS)、活动范围(ROM)和生存率。

设计

使用来自随机对照试验、队列研究和全球数据库的数据进行系统评价。

数据来源

研究人员检索了1990年1月至2024年3月的Medline、Embase、Cochrane对照试验注册库和ClinicalTrials.gov。

选择研究的纳入标准

研究人员根据成年膝关节骨关节炎参与者选择研究。符合条件的研究比较UKA和TKA关于临床或手术结局的报告,包括五年以上的KSPS、KSS、KSFS、ROM和生存率。研究人员排除了少于五年的研究,或没有英文文本的研究。

结果

研究人员将29项符合条件的研究分为三组:5项随机对照试验、11项注册库和数据库研究以及13项队列研究。分析显示,在五年期间,TKA和UKA在疼痛(标准化均数差(95%CI):-0.06[-0.41,0.28],P = 90%)和KSS评分(标准化均数差(95%CI):-0.07[-0.23,0.008],P = 81%)方面均未明显优于对方。然而,在5年及以上的随访期内,KSFS(标准化均数差(95%CI):-0.30[-0.43,-0.17],P = 74%)和ROM(标准化均数差(95%CI):-0.78[-1.11,-0.46],P = 92%)倾向于UKA,而生存率倾向于TKA。

结论

在五年及以后的随访期内,UKA在KSFS和ROM方面显示出预后更好的趋势,而TKA的生存率更有利。

系统评价注册

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=517835,PROSPERO(CRD42024517835)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631a/11371575/28e5a5538194/fsurg-11-1405025-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631a/11371575/27c1eb12ac12/fsurg-11-1405025-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631a/11371575/36798f642e0c/fsurg-11-1405025-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631a/11371575/e49569ac2e58/fsurg-11-1405025-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631a/11371575/35ec2598aa76/fsurg-11-1405025-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631a/11371575/bf15976b6d5e/fsurg-11-1405025-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631a/11371575/cd45eb0937f6/fsurg-11-1405025-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631a/11371575/28e5a5538194/fsurg-11-1405025-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631a/11371575/27c1eb12ac12/fsurg-11-1405025-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631a/11371575/36798f642e0c/fsurg-11-1405025-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631a/11371575/e49569ac2e58/fsurg-11-1405025-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631a/11371575/35ec2598aa76/fsurg-11-1405025-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631a/11371575/bf15976b6d5e/fsurg-11-1405025-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631a/11371575/cd45eb0937f6/fsurg-11-1405025-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/631a/11371575/28e5a5538194/fsurg-11-1405025-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparative long-term outcomes of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty in knee osteoarthritis patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.膝关节骨关节炎患者单髁置换与全膝关节置换的长期疗效比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Surg. 2024 Aug 21;11:1405025. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1405025. eCollection 2024.
2
Patient relevant outcomes of unicompartmental versus total knee replacement: systematic review and meta-analysis.单髁膝关节置换与全膝关节置换的患者相关结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Feb 21;364:l352. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l352.
3
What Are the All-Cause Survivorship Rates and Functional Outcomes in Patients Younger Than 55 Years Undergoing Primary Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review.55 岁以下初次膝关节置换患者的全因生存率和功能结局如何?一项系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2022 Mar 1;480(3):507-522. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002023.
4
Is unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) superior to total knee arthroplasty (TKA)? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.单髁膝关节置换术(UKA)是否优于全膝关节置换术(TKA)?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015 Jul;25(5):799-806. doi: 10.1007/s00590-015-1610-9. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
5
Health-related quality of life after total knee arthroplasty and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.全膝关节置换术和单髁膝关节置换术治疗单间室骨关节炎的术后生活质量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2024 May-Aug;32(2):10225536241256245. doi: 10.1177/10225536241256245.
6
Clinical outcomes, complications, and survivorship for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in patients aged 80 years and older with isolated medial knee osteoarthritis: a matched cohort analysis.80 岁及以上单纯内侧膝关节骨关节炎患者行单髁膝关节置换术与全膝关节置换术的临床结果、并发症和生存率:匹配队列分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Oct;143(10):6371-6379. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04916-9. Epub 2023 May 27.
7
Is unicompartmental knee arthroplasty a better choice than total knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental osteoarthritis? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.对于单间室骨关节炎,单髁膝关节置换术比全膝关节置换术是更好的选择吗?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2024 Jul 11. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000003193.
8
Better short-term function after unicompartmental compared to total knee arthroplasty.与全膝关节置换术相比,单髁膝关节置换术后短期功能更佳。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Apr 2;22(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04185-w.
9
A meta-analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revised to total knee arthroplasty versus primary total knee arthroplasty.单髁膝关节置换翻修为全膝关节置换与初次全膝关节置换的荟萃分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Jun 22;13(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0859-1.
10
Outcomes of Bi-unicompartmental Versus Total Knee Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Medial and Lateral Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies.双单髁置换与全膝关节置换治疗膝内、外侧骨关节炎的疗效:一项比较研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Indian J Orthop. 2022 Apr 6;56(6):963-972. doi: 10.1007/s43465-022-00628-1. eCollection 2022 Jun.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary care rehabilitation after Knee Replacement - a cross sectional study.膝关节置换术后的初级保健康复——一项横断面研究
Arch Physiother. 2025 Jul 3;15:184-191. doi: 10.33393/aop.2025.3405. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Offers More Natural Feeling Joints Compared with Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.与全膝关节置换术相比,单髁膝关节置换术可提供更自然的关节感受:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
JB JS Open Access. 2025 May 8;10(2). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.25.00011. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
3
Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index is a risk factor for long-term decreases in patient-reported outcome measures following total knee arthroplasty.

本文引用的文献

1
Advantages and limitations of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an overview of the literature.单髁膝关节置换术中活动平台的优缺点:文献综述。
Expert Rev Med Devices. 2024 Jul;21(7):587-600. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2024.2367002. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
2
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Patients Have Lower Joint Awareness and Higher Function at 5 Years Compared to Total Knee Arthroplasties: A Matched Comparison.单髁膝关节置换术患者的关节认知度低于全膝关节置换术患者,但术后 5 年的功能优于后者:一项配对比较研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2023 Aug;38(8):1464-1469. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.01.063. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
3
老年营养风险指数是全膝关节置换术后患者报告结局指标长期下降的一个风险因素。
J Exp Orthop. 2025 Feb 12;12(1):e70170. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.70170. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Characterization of rectus femoris lesions in knee osteoarthritis at different stages and the effect of ultrasound-guided acupotomy.膝关节骨关节炎不同阶段股直肌损伤的特征及超声引导针刀治疗的效果
Front Physiol. 2025 Jan 23;15:1496425. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2024.1496425. eCollection 2024.
The mid-term outcomes of mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient.
同一患者中活动平台单髁膝关节置换术与全膝关节置换术的中期疗效比较
Front Surg. 2023 Jan 25;10:1033830. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1033830. eCollection 2023.
4
Comparison of Functional Recovery Between Unicompartmental and Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.单髁膝关节置换术与全膝关节置换术功能恢复的比较:一项随机对照试验
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2023 Feb 1;105(3):191-201. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00950. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
5
Five-year follow-up of patients with knee osteoarthritis not eligible for total knee replacement: results from a randomised trial.膝关节骨关节炎患者不符合全膝关节置换条件的 5 年随访:一项随机试验的结果。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 25;12(11):e060169. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-060169.
6
Effectiveness of a multifaceted quality improvement intervention to improve patient outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a registry nested cluster randomised controlled trial.多方面质量改进干预措施对改善全髋关节和膝关节置换术后患者预后的有效性:一项基于登记处的巢式整群随机对照试验。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Jan;32(1):34-46. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014472. Epub 2022 Jun 22.
7
A Matched Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Total and Unicompartmental Knee Replacements in Different Ages Based on National Databases: Analysis of Data From the National Joint Registry for England, Wales, Northern Ireland, and the Isle of Man.基于国家数据库的不同年龄段全膝关节置换与单髁膝关节置换长期结局的配对比较:来自英格兰、威尔士、北爱尔兰和马恩岛国家关节登记处的数据分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Feb;37(2):243-251. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.09.018. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
8
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: Survivorship and Risk Factors for Revision: A Population-Based Cohort Study with Minimum 10-Year Follow-up.单髁膝关节置换术:翻修的生存率及危险因素:一项至少随访10年的基于人群的队列研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 Dec 1;103(23):2170-2176. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.21.00346. Epub 2021 Sep 21.
9
Imageless robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty leads to similar 24-month WOMAC scores as compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective cohort study.无影像机器人辅助全膝关节置换术与传统全膝关节置换术相比,24 个月时 WOMAC 评分相似:一项回顾性队列研究。
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Aug;30(8):2631-2638. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06599-4. Epub 2021 May 7.
10
Periprosthetic Fractures Through Tracking Pin Sites Following Computer Navigated and Robotic Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.计算机导航和机器人辅助全膝关节置换及单髁膝关节置换术后经跟踪针道的假体周围骨折:一项系统评价
JBJS Rev. 2021 Jan 26;9(1):e20.00091. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.RVW.20.00091.