Department of Hematology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Acta Clin Belg. 2024 Aug;79(4):276-284. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2024.2399365. Epub 2024 Sep 18.
INTRODUCTION: Large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL) are the most frequently aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has emerged as a new, powerful treatment for relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease. Two CAR-T cell products, tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel,) and axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), are reimbursed in Belgium for R/R LBCL beyond second line. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to report the outcome with tisa-cel and axi-cel for R/R LBCL beyond second line in the years 2019-2023 at the University Hospitals Leuven for 79 patients selected for apheresis and CAR-T infusion. RESULTS: Eleven patients (14%) did not proceed to CAR-T cell infusion. For infused patients ( = 68), the best overall response rate (ORR)/complete response (CR) rate was 64%/49% for tisa-cel and 88%/66% for axi-cel ( = 0.04 for ORR). After a median follow-up of 13.8 months, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 1 year were 30% and 43% for tisa-cel and 48% and 62% for axi-cel. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (all grades/grade ≥3) occurred in 82%/9% after tisa-cel and in 97%/0% after axi-cel. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) (all grades/grade ≥3) occurred in 24%/18% after tisa-cel and in 54%/40% after axi-cel. The non-relapse mortality in the infusion cohort was 13%. CONCLUSION: Our real-world data show high and durable response rates, with a non-significant trend towards a higher efficacy and higher toxicity for axi-cel compared to tisa-cel. Our results are in line with other real-world registries except for a shorter median OS and more high-grade ICANS.
简介:大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)是最常见的侵袭性 B 细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤。抗 CD19 嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T 细胞疗法已成为治疗复发或难治性(R/R)疾病的一种新的、强大的治疗方法。两种 CAR-T 细胞产品,tisagenlecleucel(tisa-cel)和 axicabtagene ciloleucel(axi-cel),在比利时被报销用于二线以上复发或难治性 LBCL。 目的和方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,报告了 2019 年至 2023 年在鲁汶大学医院接受二线以上复发或难治性 LBCL 患者接受 tisa-cel 和 axi-cel 治疗的结果,共 79 例患者接受了单采和 CAR-T 输注。 结果:11 例(14%)患者未进行 CAR-T 细胞输注。对于输注患者( = 68),tisa-cel 的最佳总缓解率(ORR)/完全缓解率(CR)为 64%/49%,axi-cel 为 88%/66%(ORR 无统计学意义)。中位随访 13.8 个月后,tisa-cel 的 1 年无进展生存率(PFS)和总生存率(OS)分别为 30%和 43%,axi-cel 分别为 48%和 62%。tisa-cel 后发生细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)(所有级别/≥3 级)为 82%/9%,axi-cel 后为 97%/0%。tisa-cel 后发生免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)(所有级别/≥3 级)为 24%/18%,axi-cel 后为 54%/40%。输注队列的非复发死亡率为 13%。 结论:我们的真实世界数据显示,高且持久的缓解率,axi-cel 与 tisa-cel 相比,疗效有非显著趋势更高,毒性更高。我们的结果与其他真实世界登记处一致,除了中位 OS 更短和更高等级的 ICANS 更多。