针对一家精准儿童与青少年心理健康初创企业的参与式逻辑模型:范围综述、案例研究及经验教训
Participatory logic model for a precision child and youth mental health start-up: scoping review, case study, and lessons learned.
作者信息
Pajer Kathleen, Honeywell Christina, Howley Heather, Sheridan Nicole, Affleck Will, Terekhov Ivan, Radhakrishnan Dhenuka
机构信息
Department of Psychiatry, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CHEO), Ottawa, ON, Canada.
CHEO Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
出版信息
Front Health Serv. 2024 Oct 17;4:1405426. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1405426. eCollection 2024.
BACKGROUND
The precision child and youth mental health (PCYMH) paradigm has great potential to transform CYMH care and research, but there are numerous concerns about feasibility, sustainablity, and equity. Implementation science and evaluation methodology, particularly participatory logic models created with stakeholders, may help catalyze PCYMH-driven system transformation. This paper aims to: (1) report results of a PCYMH logic model scoping review; (2) present a case study illustrating creation of a participatory logic model for a PCYMH start-up; and (3) share the final model plus lessons learned.
METHODS
comprised several steps to develop a preliminary draft: scoping review of PCYMH logic models; two literature reviews (PCYMH and implementation science research); an environmental scan of our organization's PCYMH research; a gap analysis of our technological capability to support PCYMH research; and 57 stakeholder interviews assessing PCYMH perspectives and readiness. integrated Phase 1 information into a draft from which the final logic model was completed through iterative stakeholder co-creation.
RESULTS
: The scoping review identified 0 documents. The PCYMH literature review informed our Problem and Impact Statements. Reviewing implementation and evaluation literature resulted in selection of the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) and Behavior Change Wheel (BCW) frameworks to guide model development. Only 1.2% (5/414) of the organization's research projects involved PCYMH. Three technological infrastructure gaps were identified as barriers to developing PCYMH research. Stakeholder readiness interviews identified three themes that were incorporated into the draft. : Eight co-creation cycles with 36 stakeholders representing 13 groups and a consensus decision-making process were used to produce the final participatory logic model.
CONCLUSIONS
This is the first study to report the development of a participatory logic model for a PCYMH program, detailing involvement of stakeholders from initial planning stages to the final consensus-based product. We learned that creating a participatory logic model is time- and labour-intensive and requires a multi-disciplinary team, but the process produced stakeholder-program relationships that enabled us to quickly build and implement the PCYMH start-up. Our processes and final model can inform similar efforts at other sites.
背景
精准儿童和青少年心理健康(PCYMH)模式在转变儿童和青少年心理健康护理与研究方面具有巨大潜力,但人们对其可行性、可持续性和公平性存在诸多担忧。实施科学和评估方法,特别是与利益相关者共同创建的参与式逻辑模型,可能有助于推动由PCYMH驱动的系统变革。本文旨在:(1)报告PCYMH逻辑模型范围综述的结果;(2)展示一个案例研究,说明为一个PCYMH初创项目创建参与式逻辑模型的过程;(3)分享最终模型以及经验教训。
方法
包括几个步骤来制定初步草案:对PCYMH逻辑模型进行范围综述;两次文献综述(PCYMH和实施科学研究);对本组织的PCYMH研究进行环境扫描;对我们支持PCYMH研究的技术能力进行差距分析;以及57次利益相关者访谈,评估他们对PCYMH的看法和准备情况。将第一阶段的信息整合到一个草案中,通过利益相关者的迭代共同创建完成最终的逻辑模型。
结果
范围综述确定了0份文件。PCYMH文献综述为我们的问题和影响陈述提供了信息。对实施和评估文献的回顾导致选择了“覆盖范围、有效性、采用率、实施、维持”(RE-AIM)和行为改变轮(BCW)框架来指导模型开发。该组织的研究项目中只有1.2%(5/414)涉及PCYMH。确定了三个技术基础设施差距,作为开展PCYMH研究的障碍。利益相关者准备情况访谈确定了三个主题,并纳入了草案。与代表13个群体的36名利益相关者进行了八个共同创建周期,并采用了共识决策过程,以产生最终的参与式逻辑模型。
结论
这是第一项报告为PCYMH项目开发参与式逻辑模型的研究,详细介绍了利益相关者从初始规划阶段到最终基于共识的产品的参与情况。我们了解到,创建一个参与式逻辑模型既耗时又耗力,需要一个多学科团队,但这个过程产生了利益相关者与项目的关系,使我们能够迅速建立并实施PCYMH初创项目。我们的过程和最终模型可以为其他地方的类似工作提供参考。